From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 18/24] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:10:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206181711.1902989-19-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206181711.1902989-1-elver@google.com>
Add support for Clang's capability analysis for rw_semaphore.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
.../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst | 2 +-
include/linux/rwsem.h | 56 +++++++++-------
lib/test_capability-analysis.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index 3766ac466470..719986739b0e 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`).
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`.
For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
index c8b543d428b0..0c84e3072370 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
* reduce the chance that they will share the same cacheline causing
* cacheline bouncing problem.
*/
-struct rw_semaphore {
+struct_with_capability(rw_semaphore) {
atomic_long_t count;
/*
* Write owner or one of the read owners as well flags regarding
@@ -76,11 +76,13 @@ static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
static inline void rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE);
}
static inline void rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(!(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED));
}
@@ -119,6 +121,7 @@ do { \
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
\
__init_rwsem((sem), #sem, &__key); \
+ __assert_cap(sem); \
} while (0)
/*
@@ -136,7 +139,7 @@ static inline int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
#include <linux/rwbase_rt.h>
-struct rw_semaphore {
+struct_with_capability(rw_semaphore) {
struct rwbase_rt rwbase;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
@@ -160,6 +163,7 @@ do { \
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
\
__init_rwsem((sem), #sem, &__key); \
+ __assert_cap(sem); \
} while (0)
static __always_inline int rwsem_is_locked(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
@@ -168,11 +172,13 @@ static __always_inline int rwsem_is_locked(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
static __always_inline void rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(sem));
}
static __always_inline void rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(!rw_base_is_write_locked(&sem->rwbase));
}
@@ -190,6 +196,7 @@ static __always_inline int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
*/
static inline void rwsem_assert_held(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))
lockdep_assert_held(sem);
@@ -198,6 +205,7 @@ static inline void rwsem_assert_held(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
static inline void rwsem_assert_held_write(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))
lockdep_assert_held_write(sem);
@@ -208,47 +216,47 @@ static inline void rwsem_assert_held_write(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/*
* lock for reading
*/
-extern void down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern int __must_check down_read_interruptible(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern int __must_check down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __acquires_shared(sem);
+extern int __must_check down_read_interruptible(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires_shared(0, sem);
+extern int __must_check down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires_shared(0, sem);
/*
* trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
-extern int down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires_shared(1, sem);
/*
* lock for writing
*/
-extern void down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern int __must_check down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __acquires(sem);
+extern int __must_check down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires(0, sem);
/*
* trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
-extern int down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires(1, sem);
/*
* release a read lock
*/
-extern void up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases_shared(sem);
/*
* release a write lock
*/
-extern void up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases(sem);
-DEFINE_GUARD(rwsem_read, struct rw_semaphore *, down_read(_T), up_read(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD_COND(rwsem_read, _try, down_read_trylock(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD_COND(rwsem_read, _intr, down_read_interruptible(_T) == 0)
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(rwsem_read, struct rw_semaphore, down_read(_T->lock), up_read(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(rwsem_read, _try, down_read_trylock(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(rwsem_read, _intr, down_read_interruptible(_T->lock) == 0)
-DEFINE_GUARD(rwsem_write, struct rw_semaphore *, down_write(_T), up_write(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD_COND(rwsem_write, _try, down_write_trylock(_T))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(rwsem_write, struct rw_semaphore, down_write(_T->lock), up_write(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(rwsem_write, _try, down_write_trylock(_T->lock))
/*
* downgrade write lock to read lock
*/
-extern void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases(sem) __acquires_shared(sem);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
/*
@@ -264,11 +272,11 @@ extern void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
* lockdep_set_class() at lock initialization time.
* See Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst for more details.)
*/
-extern void down_read_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern int __must_check down_read_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern void down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern int down_write_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern void _down_write_nest_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock);
+extern void down_read_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __acquires_shared(sem);
+extern int __must_check down_read_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __cond_acquires_shared(0, sem);
+extern void down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __acquires(sem);
+extern int down_write_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __cond_acquires(0, sem);
+extern void _down_write_nest_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock) __acquires(sem);
# define down_write_nest_lock(sem, nest_lock) \
do { \
@@ -282,8 +290,8 @@ do { \
* [ This API should be avoided as much as possible - the
* proper abstraction for this case is completions. ]
*/
-extern void down_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern void up_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void down_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __acquires_shared(sem);
+extern void up_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases_shared(sem);
#else
# define down_read_nested(sem, subclass) down_read(sem)
# define down_read_killable_nested(sem, subclass) down_read_killable(sem)
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 8bc8c3e6cb5c..4638d220f474 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <linux/build_bug.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
@@ -255,6 +256,69 @@ static void __used test_seqlock_writer(struct test_seqlock_data *d)
write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&d->sl, flags);
}
+struct test_rwsem_data {
+ struct rw_semaphore sem;
+ int counter __var_guarded_by(&sem);
+};
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_init(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ init_rwsem(&d->sem);
+ d->counter = 0;
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_reader(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ down_read(&d->sem);
+ (void)d->counter;
+ up_read(&d->sem);
+
+ if (down_read_trylock(&d->sem)) {
+ (void)d->counter;
+ up_read(&d->sem);
+ }
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_writer(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ down_write(&d->sem);
+ d->counter++;
+ up_write(&d->sem);
+
+ down_write(&d->sem);
+ d->counter++;
+ downgrade_write(&d->sem);
+ (void)d->counter;
+ up_read(&d->sem);
+
+ if (down_write_trylock(&d->sem)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ up_write(&d->sem);
+ }
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_assert(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(&d->sem);
+ d->counter++;
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_guard(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ { guard(rwsem_read)(&d->sem); (void)d->counter; }
+ { guard(rwsem_write)(&d->sem); d->counter++; }
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_cond_guard(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ scoped_cond_guard(rwsem_read_try, return, &d->sem) {
+ (void)d->counter;
+ }
+ scoped_cond_guard(rwsem_write_try, return, &d->sem) {
+ d->counter++;
+ }
+}
+
struct test_bit_spinlock_data {
unsigned long bits;
int counter __var_guarded_by(__bitlock(3, &bits));
--
2.48.1.502.g6dc24dfdaf-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 18:09 [PATCH RFC 00/24] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 01/24] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-06 18:48 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-07 8:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 02/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Rename __cond_lock() to __cond_acquire() Marco Elver
2025-02-07 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-07 9:32 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-07 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-07 9:50 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 03/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 04/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 05/24] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 06/24] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 07/24] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 21:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-06 22:01 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 08/24] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-02-10 18:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-10 18:23 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-10 18:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-11 13:55 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 09/24] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 10/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 11/24] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-07 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-07 20:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 12/24] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 13/24] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 14/24] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 15/24] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-02-20 22:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 22:11 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-20 22:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-21 0:16 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-21 1:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-21 17:10 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-21 18:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-21 18:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-21 19:46 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-21 19:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 16/24] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 17/24] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 19/24] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 20/24] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 21/24] kfence: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 22/24] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 23/24] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 24/24] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-02-27 7:00 ` [PATCH RFC 00/24] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250206181711.1902989-19-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox