public inbox for linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	 Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,  Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	 Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,  Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	 Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	 Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 19/24] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Thu,  6 Feb 2025 19:10:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206181711.1902989-20-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206181711.1902989-1-elver@google.com>

Add support for Clang's capability analysis for local_lock_t.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
 .../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst         |  2 +-
 include/linux/local_lock.h                    | 18 ++++----
 include/linux/local_lock_internal.h           | 41 ++++++++++++++---
 lib/test_capability-analysis.c                | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index 719986739b0e..1e9ce018e30e 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
 
 Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
 `raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`.
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`, `local_lock_t`.
 
 For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
 calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock.h b/include/linux/local_lock.h
index 091dc0b6bdfb..63fadcf66216 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
@@ -51,12 +51,12 @@
 #define local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)			\
 	__local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)
 
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock, local_lock_t __percpu*,
-	     local_lock(_T),
-	     local_unlock(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t __percpu*,
-	     local_lock_irq(_T),
-	     local_unlock_irq(_T))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock, local_lock_t __percpu,
+		    local_lock(_T->lock),
+		    local_unlock(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t __percpu,
+		    local_lock_irq(_T->lock),
+		    local_unlock_irq(_T->lock))
 DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irqsave, local_lock_t __percpu,
 		    local_lock_irqsave(_T->lock, _T->flags),
 		    local_unlock_irqrestore(_T->lock, _T->flags),
@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irqsave, local_lock_t __percpu,
 #define local_unlock_nested_bh(_lock)				\
 	__local_unlock_nested_bh(_lock)
 
-DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock_nested_bh, local_lock_t __percpu*,
-	     local_lock_nested_bh(_T),
-	     local_unlock_nested_bh(_T))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_nested_bh, local_lock_t __percpu,
+		    local_lock_nested_bh(_T->lock),
+		    local_unlock_nested_bh(_T->lock))
 
 #endif
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
index 8dd71fbbb6d2..031de28d8ffb 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
@@ -8,12 +8,13 @@
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
 
-typedef struct {
+struct_with_capability(local_lock) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
 	struct lockdep_map	dep_map;
 	struct task_struct	*owner;
 #endif
-} local_lock_t;
+};
+typedef struct local_lock local_lock_t;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
 # define LOCAL_LOCK_DEBUG_INIT(lockname)		\
@@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ do {								\
 			      0, LD_WAIT_CONFIG, LD_WAIT_INV,	\
 			      LD_LOCK_PERCPU);			\
 	local_lock_debug_init(lock);				\
+	__assert_cap(lock);					\
 } while (0)
 
 #define __spinlock_nested_bh_init(lock)				\
@@ -71,40 +73,47 @@ do {								\
 			      0, LD_WAIT_CONFIG, LD_WAIT_INV,	\
 			      LD_LOCK_NORMAL);			\
 	local_lock_debug_init(lock);				\
+	__assert_cap(lock);					\
 } while (0)
 
 #define __local_lock(lock)					\
 	do {							\
 		preempt_disable();				\
 		local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
+		__acquire(lock);				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_lock_irq(lock)					\
 	do {							\
 		local_irq_disable();				\
 		local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
+		__acquire(lock);				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)			\
 	do {							\
 		local_irq_save(flags);				\
 		local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
+		__acquire(lock);				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_unlock(lock)					\
 	do {							\
+		__release(lock);				\
 		local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
 		preempt_enable();				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_unlock_irq(lock)				\
 	do {							\
+		__release(lock);				\
 		local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
 		local_irq_enable();				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)			\
 	do {							\
+		__release(lock);				\
 		local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
 		local_irq_restore(flags);			\
 	} while (0)
@@ -113,19 +122,37 @@ do {								\
 	do {							\
 		lockdep_assert_in_softirq();			\
 		local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock));	\
+		__acquire(lock);				\
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_unlock_nested_bh(lock)				\
-	local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock))
+	do {							\
+		__release(lock);				\
+		local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock));		\
+	} while (0)
 
 #else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
 
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
 /*
  * On PREEMPT_RT local_lock maps to a per CPU spinlock, which protects the
  * critical section while staying preemptible.
  */
 typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
 
+/*
+ * Because the compiler only knows about the base per-CPU variable, use this
+ * helper function to make the compiler think we lock/unlock the @base variable,
+ * and hide the fact we actually pass the per-CPU instance @pcpu to lock/unlock
+ * functions.
+ */
+static inline local_lock_t *__local_lock_alias(local_lock_t __percpu *base, local_lock_t *pcpu)
+	__returns_cap(base)
+{
+	return pcpu;
+}
+
 #define INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lockname) __LOCAL_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED((lockname))
 
 #define __local_lock_init(l)					\
@@ -136,7 +163,7 @@ typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
 #define __local_lock(__lock)					\
 	do {							\
 		migrate_disable();				\
-		spin_lock(this_cpu_ptr((__lock)));		\
+		spin_lock(__local_lock_alias(__lock, this_cpu_ptr((__lock)))); \
 	} while (0)
 
 #define __local_lock_irq(lock)			__local_lock(lock)
@@ -150,7 +177,7 @@ typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
 
 #define __local_unlock(__lock)					\
 	do {							\
-		spin_unlock(this_cpu_ptr((__lock)));		\
+		spin_unlock(__local_lock_alias(__lock, this_cpu_ptr((__lock)))); \
 		migrate_enable();				\
 	} while (0)
 
@@ -161,12 +188,12 @@ typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
 #define __local_lock_nested_bh(lock)				\
 do {								\
 	lockdep_assert_in_softirq_func();			\
-	spin_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock));				\
+	spin_lock(__local_lock_alias(lock, this_cpu_ptr(lock))); \
 } while (0)
 
 #define __local_unlock_nested_bh(lock)				\
 do {								\
-	spin_unlock(this_cpu_ptr((lock)));			\
+	spin_unlock(__local_lock_alias(lock, this_cpu_ptr((lock)))); \
 } while (0)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 4638d220f474..dd3fccff2352 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@
 
 #include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/build_bug.h>
+#include <linux/local_lock.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/rwsem.h>
 #include <linux/seqlock.h>
@@ -433,3 +435,47 @@ static void __used test_srcu_guard(struct test_srcu_data *d)
 	guard(srcu)(&d->srcu);
 	(void)srcu_dereference(d->data, &d->srcu);
 }
+
+struct test_local_lock_data {
+	local_lock_t lock;
+	int counter __var_guarded_by(&lock);
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct test_local_lock_data, test_local_lock_data) = {
+	.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
+};
+
+static void __used test_local_lock_init(struct test_local_lock_data *d)
+{
+	local_lock_init(&d->lock);
+	d->counter = 0;
+}
+
+static void __used test_local_lock(void)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_lock(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+	this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+	local_unlock(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+
+	local_lock_irq(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+	this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+	local_unlock_irq(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+
+	local_lock_irqsave(&test_local_lock_data.lock, flags);
+	this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+	local_unlock_irqrestore(&test_local_lock_data.lock, flags);
+
+	local_lock_nested_bh(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+	this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1);
+	local_unlock_nested_bh(&test_local_lock_data.lock);
+}
+
+static void __used test_local_lock_guard(void)
+{
+	{ guard(local_lock)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+	{ guard(local_lock_irq)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+	{ guard(local_lock_irqsave)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+	{ guard(local_lock_nested_bh)(&test_local_lock_data.lock); this_cpu_add(test_local_lock_data.counter, 1); }
+}
-- 
2.48.1.502.g6dc24dfdaf-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-06 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-06 18:09 [PATCH RFC 00/24] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 01/24] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:40   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-06 18:48     ` Marco Elver
2025-02-07  8:33       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 02/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Rename __cond_lock() to __cond_acquire() Marco Elver
2025-02-07  8:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-07  9:32     ` Marco Elver
2025-02-07  9:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-07  9:50         ` Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 03/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 04/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 05/24] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 06/24] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 07/24] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 21:29   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-06 22:01     ` Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 08/24] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-02-10 18:09   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-10 18:23     ` Marco Elver
2025-02-10 18:53       ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-11 13:55         ` Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 09/24] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 10/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 11/24] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-07  8:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-07 20:58     ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 12/24] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 13/24] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 14/24] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 15/24] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-02-20 22:00   ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 22:11     ` Marco Elver
2025-02-20 22:36       ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-21  0:16         ` Marco Elver
2025-02-21  1:26           ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-21 17:10             ` Marco Elver
2025-02-21 18:08               ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-21 18:52                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-21 19:46                   ` Marco Elver
2025-02-21 19:57                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 16/24] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 17/24] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 18/24] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 20/24] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 21/24] kfence: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 22/24] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 23/24] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 24/24] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-02-27  7:00 ` [PATCH RFC 00/24] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250206181711.1902989-20-elver@google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox