From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, seanjc@google.com,
peterz@infradead.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
ardb@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, aik@amd.com,
Michael.Roth@amd.com, KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com,
Tycho.Andersen@amd.com, Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com,
ackerleytng@google.com, jackyli@google.com, pgonda@google.com,
rientjes@google.com, jacobhxu@google.com, xin@zytor.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
dyoung@redhat.com, nikunj@amd.com, john.allen@amd.com,
darwi@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 13:56:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <748785f1-f176-4f0a-8b8d-eadf46b20960@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ecd09557-ed93-4d05-9850-d02c31900f87@amd.com>
Hello Boris,
On 7/31/2026 7:37 AM, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
>
> On 7/31/2026 12:44 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> + migrate_disable();
>>> + this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>> +
>>> + cpumask_andnot(follower_mask, rmpopt_cpumask,
>>> + topology_sibling_cpumask(this_cpu));
>>> +
>>> + for (pa = rmpopt_pa_start; pa < rmpopt_pa_end; pa += SZ_1G)
>>> + rmpopt(pa);
>>> +
>>> + migrate_enable();
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Followers: run RMPOPT on the remaining cores. cpus_read_lock() is
>>> + * intentionally not held here: CPU hotplug is disabled for the entire
>>> + * time SNP is active (see snp_prepare()), and this work only runs while
>>> + * SNP is active, so the follower set stays valid across the whole scan.
>>> + */
>>> + for (pa = rmpopt_pa_start; pa < rmpopt_pa_end; pa += SZ_1G)
>>> + on_each_cpu_mask(follower_mask, rmpopt_smp, (void *)pa, true);
>>
>> An IPI per 1G pa?!?!? On each CPU?!
>>
>> Instead of IPIing each CPU and inside the handler, doing the loop?
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>
> You're right — an IPI per 1 GB is far too many. Will restructure to a single IPI per follower core: a new on_each_cpu()
> callback can loop over the whole range on the CPU it runs on. The leader will call it directly (migrate-disabled) to populate
> the RMP scan cache, then one on_each_cpu_mask() will run it on the remaining cores.
>
> This will also fold nicely with the earlier cleanup: __rmpopt() getting merged into rmpopt().
>
> One important tradeoff to be aware of: each follower IPI handler will now run a 2048-iteration loop with IRQs disabled —
> but followers are RMP-scan cache hits (the leader populated the cache), so each rmpopt() there is cheap, and this only runs
> at setup and guest-teardown re-optimization time.
>
Following up again on the tradeoff above.
Referencing your point about not IPIing per 1 GB, two ways to run the follower scan (followers = primary threads only, one
per core, so ~half the logical CPUs — not every CPU):
A) Loop on the worker, IPI per 1 GB: loop is preemptible / IRQs on, only a single op per IPI runs IRQs-off — but 2048
IPIs per follower.
B) One IPI per core, loop in the handler: a single IPI per follower, but the whole ~2048-iteration loop runs
non-preemptible with IRQs disabled.
Followers are RMP-scan cache hits (cheap) and this only runs at setup/teardown, so I'm leaning toward (B) — but it does
mean a bounded non-preemptible/IRQ-off window per core. If you'd rather keep it preemptible, I can run the per-core loop
as per-CPU work instead. Which do you prefer?
Thanks,
Ashish
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 19:00 [PATCH v11 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:03 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:01 ` Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:04 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
2026-07-29 2:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-29 17:51 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-31 19:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2026-07-31 20:27 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-27 19:04 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
2026-07-30 2:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-30 2:55 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-30 3:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-30 19:52 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-30 20:00 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-31 0:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-31 19:43 ` Tom Lendacky
2026-07-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-07-31 5:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-31 12:37 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-03 18:56 ` Kalra, Ashish [this message]
2026-08-03 19:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-03 19:37 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-03 21:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-03 21:23 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-03 21:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-03 22:22 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-05 0:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-05 2:38 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-05 19:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-05 21:04 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-05 15:12 ` Dave Hansen
2026-08-05 19:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-03 21:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-31 20:14 ` Tom Lendacky
2026-07-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:06 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=748785f1-f176-4f0a-8b8d-eadf46b20960@amd.com \
--to=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com \
--cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
--cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackyli@google.com \
--cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox