Linux cryptographic layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@amd.com>,
	tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	seanjc@google.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	ardb@kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, aik@amd.com, Michael.Roth@amd.com,
	KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com, Tycho.Andersen@amd.com,
	Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
	jackyli@google.com, pgonda@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
	jacobhxu@google.com, xin@zytor.com,
	pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
	dyoung@redhat.com, nikunj@amd.com, john.allen@amd.com,
	darwi@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:43:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4dcb5f0-91a7-4253-adf3-8f1ac0e113b8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff346ea1770cf996e1623270a085ac08d21888c6.1784844080.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com>

On 7/27/26 14:04, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
> 
> The new RMPOPT instruction helps manage per-CPU RMP optimization
> structures inside the CPU. It takes a 1GB-aligned physical address
> and either returns the status of the optimizations or tries to enable
> the optimizations.
> 
> Per-CPU RMPOPT tables support at most 2 TB of addressable memory for
> RMP optimizations.
> 
> Initialize the per-CPU RMPOPT table base to the starting physical
> address. This enables RMP optimization for up to 2 TB of system RAM on
> all CPUs.
> 
> Additionally, add support to setup and enable RMPOPT once SNP is
> enabled and initialized.
> 
> Suggested-by: Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h |  3 ++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h       |  2 +
>  arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c          | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c     |  3 ++
>  4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 18c4be75e927..d2cb0a7cd0a2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -761,6 +761,9 @@
>  #define MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED_BIT	0
>  #define MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED	BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED_BIT)
>  #define MSR_AMD64_RMP_SEGMENT_SHIFT(x)	(((x) & GENMASK_ULL(13, 8)) >> 8)
> +#define MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE		0xc0010139
> +#define MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_ENABLE_BIT	0
> +#define MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_ENABLE		BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_ENABLE_BIT)
>  
>  #define MSR_SVSM_CAA			0xc001f000
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> index 594cfa19cbd4..6fd72a44a51e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> @@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ static inline void snp_leak_pages(u64 pfn, unsigned int pages)
>  	__snp_leak_pages(pfn, pages, true);
>  }
>  int snp_prepare(void);
> +void snp_setup_rmpopt(void);
>  void snp_shutdown(void);
>  #else
>  static inline bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void) { return false; }
> @@ -680,6 +681,7 @@ static inline void snp_leak_pages(u64 pfn, unsigned int npages) {}
>  static inline void kdump_sev_callback(void) { }
>  static inline void snp_fixup_e820_tables(void) {}
>  static inline int snp_prepare(void) { return -ENODEV; }
> +static inline void snp_setup_rmpopt(void) {}
>  static inline void snp_shutdown(void) {}
>  #endif
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> index e2f69fba0938..8bfd80284836 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> @@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ static void *rmp_bookkeeping __ro_after_init;
>  
>  static u64 probed_rmp_base, probed_rmp_size;
>  
> +static cpumask_var_t rmpopt_cpumask;
> +static phys_addr_t rmpopt_pa_start;
> +
>  static LIST_HEAD(snp_leaked_pages_list);
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(snp_leaked_pages_list_lock);
>  
> @@ -558,6 +561,17 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_prepare, "ccp");
>  
> +static void snp_cleanup_rmpopt(void)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask)
> +		wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE, 0);
> +
> +	free_cpumask_var(rmpopt_cpumask);
> +	rmpopt_pa_start = 0;
> +}
> +
>  void snp_shutdown(void)
>  {
>  	u64 syscfg;
> @@ -567,10 +581,11 @@ void snp_shutdown(void)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * The firmware has disabled SNP (SnpEn is clear), so re-enable CPU
> -	 * hotplug.  A legacy SNP shutdown returns above with SnpEn still set and
> -	 * leaves hotplug disabled.
> +	 * Clear the RMPOPT_BASE MSRs while CPU hotplug is still disabled, then
> +	 * re-enable hotplug now that the firmware has disabled SNP.  A legacy SNP
> +	 * shutdown returns above with SnpEn still set and leaves hotplug disabled.
>  	 */
> +	snp_cleanup_rmpopt();

Why not leave everything unchanged comment wise and just add the
snp_cleanup_rmpopt() before the comment with a simple comment above the
call to snp_cleanup_rmpopt(), e.g.:

	/* Disable RMPOPT while CPU hotplug is disabled */
	snp_cleanup_rmpopt();

	/*
	 * Original comment block
	 */
	cpu_hotplug_enable();

Thanks,
Tom

>  	cpu_hotplug_enable();
>  
>  	clear_rmp();
> @@ -578,6 +593,46 @@ void snp_shutdown(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_shutdown, "ccp");
>  
> +static bool rmpopt_capable(void)
> +{
> +	return cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT) &&
> +	       cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP);
> +}
> +
> +void snp_setup_rmpopt(void)
> +{
> +	u64 rmpopt_base;
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	if (!rmpopt_capable())
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rmpopt_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to allocate RMPOPT cpumask\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The RMPOPT_BASE MSR is per-core, so only one thread per core needs
> +	 * to set up the RMPOPT_BASE MSR.  All primary threads are online,
> +	 * otherwise SNP would not have been enabled.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> +		if (topology_is_primary_thread(cpu))
> +			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask);
> +
> +	rmpopt_pa_start = ALIGN_DOWN(PFN_PHYS(min_low_pfn), SZ_1G);
> +	rmpopt_base = rmpopt_pa_start | MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_ENABLE;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Per-CPU RMPOPT tables cover at most 2 TB.  Program each core's
> +	 * RMPOPT_BASE with the start of RAM to optimize up to 2 TB.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask)
> +		wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE, rmpopt_base);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_setup_rmpopt, "ccp");
> +
>  /*
>   * Do the necessary preparations which are verified by the firmware as
>   * described in the SNP_INIT_EX firmware command description in the SNP
> @@ -705,10 +760,12 @@ bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
>  	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP))
>  		rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG, rmp_cfg);
>  
> -	if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED)
> +	if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED) {
>  		return probe_segmented_rmptable_info();
> -	else
> +	} else {
> +		setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT);
>  		return probe_contiguous_rmptable_info();
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> index ca473ca198b8..c002a7ca26a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> @@ -1477,6 +1477,9 @@ static int __sev_snp_init_locked(int *error, unsigned int max_snp_asid)
>  	}
>  
>  	snp_hv_fixed_pages_state_update(sev, HV_FIXED);
> +
> +	snp_setup_rmpopt();
> +
>  	sev->snp_initialized = true;
>  	dev_dbg(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP firmware initialized, SEV-TIO is %s\n",
>  		data.tio_en ? "enabled" : "disabled");


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-27 19:00 [PATCH v11 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:03 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:01   ` Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:04 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
2026-07-29  2:15   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-29 17:51     ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-31 19:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2026-07-31 20:27     ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-27 19:04 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
2026-07-30  2:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-30  2:55     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-30  3:39       ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-30 19:52         ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-30 20:00     ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-31  0:12       ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-31 19:43   ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2026-07-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-07-31  5:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-31 12:37     ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-03 18:56       ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-03 19:24         ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-03 19:37           ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-03 21:02             ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-03 21:23               ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-03 21:38                 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-03 22:22                   ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-05  0:49                     ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-05  2:38                       ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-05 19:28                         ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-05 21:04                           ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-08-05 15:12                       ` Dave Hansen
2026-08-05 19:33                         ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-03 21:10       ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-31 20:14   ` Tom Lendacky
2026-07-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:06 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b4dcb5f0-91a7-4253-adf3-8f1ac0e113b8@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=Ashish.Kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
    --cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
    --cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jackyli@google.com \
    --cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
    --cc=john.allen@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nikunj@amd.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox