From: huangchenghai <huangchenghai2@huawei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>, <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@openeuler.org>, <fanghao11@huawei.com>,
<shenyang39@huawei.com>, <liulongfang@huawei.com>,
<qianweili@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] uacce: fix for cdev memory leak
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:56:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e5d4afb-8a21-4a93-a80f-e1f2b6baa8ca@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025091620-theft-glue-5e7f@gregkh>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2025 at 11:15 PM +0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:48:08PM +0800, Chenghai Huang wrote:
>> From: Wenkai Lin <linwenkai6@hisilicon.com>
>>
>> If cdev_device_add failed, it is hard to determine
>> whether cdev_del has been executed, which lead to a
>> memory leak issue, so we use cdev_init to avoid it.
> I do not understand, what is wrong with the current code? It checks if
> add fails:
>
>> Fixes: 015d239ac014 ("uacce: add uacce driver")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Wenkai Lin <linwenkai6@hisilicon.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chenghai Huang <huangchenghai2@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c | 13 ++++---------
>> include/linux/uacce.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
>> index 42e7d2a2a90c..12370469f646 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
>> @@ -522,14 +522,10 @@ int uacce_register(struct uacce_device *uacce)
>> if (!uacce)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> - uacce->cdev = cdev_alloc();
>> - if (!uacce->cdev)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
> This is the check.
>
>
>> -
>> - uacce->cdev->ops = &uacce_fops;
>> - uacce->cdev->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>> + cdev_init(&uacce->cdev, &uacce_fops);
>> + uacce->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>
>> - return cdev_device_add(uacce->cdev, &uacce->dev);
>> + return cdev_device_add(&uacce->cdev, &uacce->dev);
> And so is this. So what is wrong here?
>
>
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uacce_register);
>>
>> @@ -568,8 +564,7 @@ void uacce_remove(struct uacce_device *uacce)
>> unmap_mapping_range(q->mapping, 0, 0, 1);
>> }
>>
>> - if (uacce->cdev)
>> - cdev_device_del(uacce->cdev, &uacce->dev);
>> + cdev_device_del(&uacce->cdev, &uacce->dev);
>> xa_erase(&uacce_xa, uacce->dev_id);
>> /*
>> * uacce exists as long as there are open fds, but ops will be freed
>> diff --git a/include/linux/uacce.h b/include/linux/uacce.h
>> index e290c0269944..98b896192a44 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/uacce.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/uacce.h
>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ struct uacce_device {
>> bool is_vf;
>> u32 flags;
>> u32 dev_id;
>> - struct cdev *cdev;
>> + struct cdev cdev;
>> struct device dev;
> You can not do this, you now have 2 different reference counts
> controlling the lifespan of this one structure. That is just going to
> cause so many more bugs...
>
> How was this tested? What is currently failing that requires this
> change?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
We analyze it theoretically there may be a memory leak
issue here, if the cdev_device_add returns a failure,
the uacce_remove will not be executed, which results in the
uacce cdev memory not being released.
Therefore, we have decided to align with the design of other
drivers by making cdev a static member of uacce_device and
releasing the memory through uacce_device.
found one example in drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.h.
struct watchdog_core_data {
struct device dev;
struct cdev cdev;
struct watchdog_device *wdd;
struct mutex lock;
ktime_t last_keepalive;
ktime_t last_hw_keepalive;
ktime_t open_deadline;
...
};
static int watchdog_cdev_register(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
{
struct watchdog_core_data *wd_data;
int err;
...
cdev_init(&wd_data->cdev, &watchdog_fops);
wd_data->cdev.owner = wdd->ops->owner;
/* Add the device */
err = cdev_device_add(&wd_data->cdev, &wd_data->dev);
...
}
static void watchdog_cdev_unregister(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
{
struct watchdog_core_data *wd_data = wdd->wd_data;
...
cdev_device_del(&wd_data->cdev, &wd_data->dev);
if (wdd->id == 0) {
misc_deregister(&watchdog_miscdev);
old_wd_data = NULL;
}
...
}
Thanks,
ChengHai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 14:48 [PATCH v2 0/4] uacce: driver fixes for memory leaks and state management Chenghai Huang
2025-09-16 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] uacce: fix for cdev memory leak Chenghai Huang
2025-09-16 15:14 ` Greg KH
2025-09-17 9:56 ` huangchenghai [this message]
2025-09-17 10:18 ` Greg KH
2025-09-26 8:47 ` huangchenghai
2025-09-26 9:37 ` linwenkai (C)
2025-09-16 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] uacce: fix isolate sysfs check condition Chenghai Huang
2025-09-16 15:15 ` Greg KH
2025-09-17 9:54 ` huangchenghai
2025-09-16 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] uacce: implement mremap in uacce_vm_ops to return -EPERM Chenghai Huang
2025-09-16 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] uacce: ensure safe queue release with state management Chenghai Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e5d4afb-8a21-4a93-a80f-e1f2b6baa8ca@huawei.com \
--to=huangchenghai2@huawei.com \
--cc=fanghao11@huawei.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=liulongfang@huawei.com \
--cc=qianweili@huawei.com \
--cc=shenyang39@huawei.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox