* [PATCH] crypto: algif_aead - stop recvmsg looping after a completed request
@ 2026-06-28 15:34 cyper
2026-07-13 1:52 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: cyper @ 2026-06-28 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herbert; +Cc: Davem, Linux Crypto, Linux Kernel
From e0ed18c8ad9a7d2ecf939f0b97e2be0567180c1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qiguang Wang <cyper@tutanota.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 21:49:55 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] crypto: algif_aead - stop recvmsg looping after a completed
request
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
A blocking recvmsg()/read() into an output buffer larger than the cipher
result hangs forever.
After the first pass of the "while (msg_data_left(msg))" loop in
aead_recvmsg() (and the identical loop in skcipher_recvmsg()) produces
the result, af_alg_get_rsgl() has consumed only as many bytes from the
output iterator as the cipher produced, so msg_data_left() is still
non-zero and the loop runs a second pass. By then af_alg_pull_tsgl()
has executed
ctx->init = ctx->more;
which, for a request that was not flagged MSG_MORE, resets ctx->init to
0 and drains ctx->used. The second pass therefore takes the
_aead_recvmsg()/_skcipher_recvmsg() gate
if (!ctx->init || ctx->more)
err = af_alg_wait_for_data(sk, flags, 0);
and af_alg_wait_for_data() blocks on
ctx->init && (!ctx->more || (min && ctx->used >= min))
which can never become true again (ctx->init == 0, min == 0), so the
task sleeps in MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT forever even though the result was
already produced in pass 1.
The sleep is interruptible, so any signal -- or a poll(POLLIN) issued
before the read -- makes recvmsg return the bytes already accumulated in
ret, which is why the hang is easy to miss. A plain blocking read with
an oversized buffer hangs deterministically; it reproduces with stock
gcm(aes).
Fix both loops by stopping once a non-MSG_MORE request has been fully
consumed (ctx->more == 0 && ctx->used == 0) instead of re-entering the
blocking wait. Partial/AIO requests (ctx->used > 0), MSG_MORE streaming
(ctx->more != 0) and the -EIOCBQUEUED/-EBADMSG paths are unaffected: the
new check is only reached after "ret += err", i.e. after a pass that
made forward progress.
Fixes: f3c802a1f300 ("crypto: algif_aead - Only wake up when ctx->more is zero")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Qiguang Wang <cyper@tutanota.com>
---
crypto/algif_aead.c | 12 ++++++++++++
crypto/algif_skcipher.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/crypto/algif_aead.c b/crypto/algif_aead.c
index 787aac8aeb24..d0756aef476d 100644
--- a/crypto/algif_aead.c
+++ b/crypto/algif_aead.c
@@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ static int aead_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
size_t ignored, int flags)
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+ struct af_alg_ctx *ctx = alg_sk(sk)->private;
int ret = 0;
lock_sock(sk);
@@ -237,6 +238,17 @@ static int aead_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
}
ret += err;
+
+ /*
+ * A request that was not flagged MSG_MORE has now been fully
+ * consumed: af_alg_pull_tsgl() reset ctx->init to ctx->more
+ * (== 0) and drained ctx->used. Stop here instead of looping
+ * back into a blocking af_alg_wait_for_data() that can never
+ * complete, which is what happens when the supplied output
+ * buffer is larger than the cipher result.
+ */
+ if (!ctx->more && !ctx->used)
+ break;
}
out:
diff --git a/crypto/algif_skcipher.c b/crypto/algif_skcipher.c
index df20bdfe1f1f..c3a5968baef4 100644
--- a/crypto/algif_skcipher.c
+++ b/crypto/algif_skcipher.c
@@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ static int skcipher_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
size_t ignored, int flags)
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+ struct af_alg_ctx *ctx = alg_sk(sk)->private;
int ret = 0;
lock_sock(sk);
@@ -202,6 +203,17 @@ static int skcipher_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
}
ret += err;
+
+ /*
+ * A request that was not flagged MSG_MORE has now been fully
+ * consumed: af_alg_pull_tsgl() reset ctx->init to ctx->more
+ * (== 0) and drained ctx->used. Stop here instead of looping
+ * back into a blocking af_alg_wait_for_data() that can never
+ * complete, which is what happens when the supplied output
+ * buffer is larger than the cipher result.
+ */
+ if (!ctx->more && !ctx->used)
+ break;
}
out:
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] crypto: algif_aead - stop recvmsg looping after a completed request
2026-06-28 15:34 [PATCH] crypto: algif_aead - stop recvmsg looping after a completed request cyper
@ 2026-07-13 1:52 ` Herbert Xu
2026-07-13 16:02 ` cyper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2026-07-13 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cyper; +Cc: Davem, Linux Crypto, Linux Kernel
On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 05:34:15PM +0200, cyper@tutanota.com wrote:
> >From e0ed18c8ad9a7d2ecf939f0b97e2be0567180c1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Qiguang Wang <cyper@tutanota.com>
> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 21:49:55 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] crypto: algif_aead - stop recvmsg looping after a completed
> request
> To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
> linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>
> A blocking recvmsg()/read() into an output buffer larger than the cipher
> result hangs forever.
>
> After the first pass of the "while (msg_data_left(msg))" loop in
> aead_recvmsg() (and the identical loop in skcipher_recvmsg()) produces
> the result, af_alg_get_rsgl() has consumed only as many bytes from the
> output iterator as the cipher produced, so msg_data_left() is still
> non-zero and the loop runs a second pass. By then af_alg_pull_tsgl()
> has executed
>
> ctx->init = ctx->more;
>
> which, for a request that was not flagged MSG_MORE, resets ctx->init to
> 0 and drains ctx->used. The second pass therefore takes the
> _aead_recvmsg()/_skcipher_recvmsg() gate
>
> if (!ctx->init || ctx->more)
> err = af_alg_wait_for_data(sk, flags, 0);
>
> and af_alg_wait_for_data() blocks on
>
> ctx->init && (!ctx->more || (min && ctx->used >= min))
>
> which can never become true again (ctx->init == 0, min == 0), so the
> task sleeps in MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT forever even though the result was
> already produced in pass 1.
The point of this loop is to wait for a new sendmsg on the socket
which is supposed to set ctx->init to true again. So are you saying
that even a new sendmsg cannot get out of this wait?
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] crypto: algif_aead - stop recvmsg looping after a completed request
2026-07-13 1:52 ` Herbert Xu
@ 2026-07-13 16:02 ` cyper
2026-07-13 23:09 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: cyper @ 2026-07-13 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: Davem, Linux Crypto, Linux Kernel
> The point of this loop is to wait for a new sendmsg on the socket
> which is supposed to set ctx->init to true again. So are you saying
> that even a new sendmsg cannot get out of this wait?
Thanks -- you're right about the mechanism, and my changelog was
imprecise. Let me correct it with what actually happens.
A new sendmsg *does* get out of that particular wait: it sets
ctx->init = true and af_alg_data_wakeup() wakes the sleeper, so
af_alg_wait_for_data() returns and _aead_recvmsg() processes the new
request. What it does *not* do is make the recvmsg() return: the
"while (msg_data_left(msg))" loop only stops once the output buffer is
full, so after processing the new request it just loops back and blocks
again in af_alg_wait_for_data() for the *next* one.
So the blocking read() as a whole never completes until the caller sends
enough separate requests to fill the entire output buffer (or a signal
arrives). I confirmed this on a live socket with stock gcm(aes), one
initial request (48B PT -> 64B result) and a 256-byte read buffer, using
a helper thread that sends additional full requests:
extra sendmsgs | read() returns | elapsed
---------------+------------------+------------------------------
0 | 64 (watchdog) | 4.00s hung
1 | 128 (watchdog) | 4.00s hung (advanced, re-blocked)
3 (fills 256) | 256 | 1.80s returned on its own
i.e. one extra sendmsg advanced the result 64 -> 128 and then blocked
again; the read() only returned by itself once four requests had filled
the 256-byte buffer exactly. (The "elapsed 4.00s" rows returned only
because a 4s alarm interrupted the sleep, which makes the loop bail out
returning the bytes accumulated so far -- that is also why a signal or
strace made my original repro "work".)
So my one-line summary "hangs forever" was wrong; the accurate statement
is: a blocking recvmsg() into a buffer larger than the data the caller
intends to send does not return -- it waits to fill the rest of the
buffer from further requests that a one-shot caller has no reason to
send (it did not set MSG_MORE).
Why I still think this is worth fixing rather than "size your buffer":
it breaks the poll()/read() contract. After a non-MSG_MORE request is
consumed, af_alg_poll() reports EPOLLIN:
if (!ctx->more || ctx->used)
mask |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
(!ctx->more is true), so a poll()-driven caller is told the socket is
readable, but the subsequent blocking read() then sleeps in
af_alg_wait_for_data() instead of returning the data poll() promised.
Same test:
sendmsg = 48
poll rc=1 revents=0x1 POLLIN=1
read=64 elapsed=4.00s
-> poll() said POLLIN but read() blocked
That is what libkcapi/OpenSSL/cryptsetup avoid today only by always
sizing the RX buffer exactly to the expected output; anything larger
trips it.
On the fix itself: stopping the loop once a non-MSG_MORE request is fully
consumed (ctx->more == 0 && ctx->used == 0) turns that case into a normal
short read, which is what poll() already advertises. It deliberately does
not change:
- MSG_MORE streaming: ctx->more != 0 -> no break, keeps waiting for the
rest of the message;
- partial / AIO output: _*_recvmsg() leaves ctx->used > 0 -> no break;
- the -EIOCBQUEUED / -EBADMSG paths: handled by the existing err <= 0
branch before the new check (the check is only reached after
"ret += err", i.e. after a pass that made forward progress).
The only behaviour it removes is coalescing *multiple independent*
non-MSG_MORE requests into a single oversized read(). That case is not
something a caller can reach or rely on deterministically:
- A single thread cannot even set it up: after one non-MSG_MORE request
the next sendmsg hits the "ctx->init && !ctx->more" gate with
ctx->used != 0 and fails with -EINVAL (verified). Coalescing is only
reachable if a *second* context sends further requests while the first
is blocked inside read() draining ctx->used.
- How many requests get coalesced then depends purely on scheduling (how
much of the buffer is filled before the next send lands), so the
result length is nondeterministic -- not an API contract anything can
depend on.
- For AEAD it is meaningless anyway: each request has its own tag and
independent result, so splitting them across separate reads loses
nothing.
With the fix that pattern returns a short read (the first request's
output) and the caller reads again -- which is exactly what poll() already
tells it to do. No single-threaded, MSG_MORE, or poll()/nonblock-driven
caller sees any change.
If you'd prefer, I can respin with the changelog rewritten around the
poll()/read() inconsistency (which is the concrete, indefensible part),
or take a different approach if you had one in mind. Happy to add a
selftest as well.
Reproducers (single-threaded hang, the poll test, and the multi-thread
sendmsg test above) are available if useful.
Thanks,
Qiguang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] crypto: algif_aead - stop recvmsg looping after a completed request
2026-07-13 16:02 ` cyper
@ 2026-07-13 23:09 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2026-07-13 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cyper; +Cc: Davem, Linux Crypto, Linux Kernel
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 06:02:42PM +0200, cyper@tutanota.com wrote:
>
> A new sendmsg *does* get out of that particular wait: it sets
> ctx->init = true and af_alg_data_wakeup() wakes the sleeper, so
> af_alg_wait_for_data() returns and _aead_recvmsg() processes the new
> request. What it does *not* do is make the recvmsg() return: the
> "while (msg_data_left(msg))" loop only stops once the output buffer is
> full, so after processing the new request it just loops back and blocks
> again in af_alg_wait_for_data() for the *next* one.
That's the intended behaviour. The recvmsg(2) call on af_alg
will not return until the buffer is filled in full. This behaviour
goes back to day one (commit 8ff590903d5fc7f5a0a988c38267a3d08e6393a2)
and changing it now could break users.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-13 23:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-28 15:34 [PATCH] crypto: algif_aead - stop recvmsg looping after a completed request cyper
2026-07-13 1:52 ` Herbert Xu
2026-07-13 16:02 ` cyper
2026-07-13 23:09 ` Herbert Xu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox