Linux cryptographic layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Franzki <ifranzki@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	dengler@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org,
	Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto/authenc: don't return -EBUSY when enqueuing the hash request
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 11:47:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNIYTm6neC3lC6dP@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e26aedc6-7132-46c3-78f3-a3582b1c4f9a@redhat.com>

On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> When we return -EBUSY from encryption routines, the caller is supposed to
> sleep until it receives -EINPROGRESS in the callback method.
> 
> However when using authenc with asynchronous hash, the hash function may 
> return -EBUSY. In this case, the crypto API never calls the caller with 
> -EINPROGRESS and it causes deadlock in dm-crypt.
> 
> Fix this by turning -EBUSY into -EINPROGRESS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> 
> ---
>  crypto/authenc.c |   10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/crypto/authenc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/crypto/authenc.c	2025-09-22 20:32:02.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/crypto/authenc.c	2025-09-22 20:35:38.000000000 +0200
> @@ -146,8 +146,11 @@ static int crypto_authenc_genicv(struct
>  				   authenc_geniv_ahash_done, req);
>  
>  	err = crypto_ahash_digest(ahreq);
> -	if (err)
> +	if (err) {
> +		if (err == -EBUSY)
> +			err = -EINPROGRESS;
>  		return err;
> +	}

If authenc gets EBUSY from the ahash, then the ahash is responsible
for sending an EINPROGRESS notification.  I just checked the authenc
code and it does pass the notification back up to the caller (which
is dm-crypt).

So if EINPROGRESS is not being received, then it's a bug in the
ahash layer or the underlying ahash algorithm.

Which phmac implementation was this?

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-23  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250908131642.385445532@debian4.vm>
     [not found] ` <3a6b6f8f-5205-459c-810a-2425aae92fc8@linux.ibm.com>
     [not found]   ` <e1e420d5-dc00-14d0-fdef-635d6ef70811@redhat.com>
     [not found]     ` <bb68f9d6-8180-4291-9e6b-33bbdcef780f@linux.ibm.com>
     [not found]       ` <8cb59ed5-1c9a-49de-beee-01eda52ad618@linux.ibm.com>
     [not found]         ` <1af710ec-0f23-2522-d715-e683b9e557d8@redhat.com>
     [not found]           ` <f799d7ab97470f2529b8dcb5566fd673@linux.ibm.com>
2025-09-22 19:08             ` [PATCH] crypto/authenc: don't return -EBUSY when enqueuing the hash request Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-23  3:47               ` Herbert Xu [this message]
2025-09-23 11:14                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-23 14:36                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-23 15:17                   ` Herbert Xu
2025-09-24 10:20                     ` [PATCH] crypto: authenc - Correctly pass EINPROGRESS back up to the caller Herbert Xu
2025-09-24 13:17                       ` Ingo Franzki
2025-11-25 14:02                     ` [PATCH] crypto/authenc: don't return -EBUSY when enqueuing the hash request Mikulas Patocka
2025-11-26  5:16                       ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aNIYTm6neC3lC6dP@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --to=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=ifranzki@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox