From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl: Move register block enumeration to core
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:44:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210921164401.h46pjfwkpr7m2ven@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4ja65PA5qjKPW4dYsVUCEiEDKD65_5vw15VryYL1h7=QQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 21-09-21 07:07:13, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:57 PM Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > CXL drivers or cxl_core itself will require the ability to map component
> > registers in order to map HDM decoder resources amongst other things.
> > Much of the register mapping code has already moved into cxl_core. The
> > code to pull the BAR number and block office remained within cxl_pci
s/office/offset - before anyone else notices...
> > because there was no need to move it. Upcoming work will require this
> > functionality to be available outside of cxl_pci.
> >
> > There are two intentional functional changes:
> > 1. cxl_pci: If there is more than 1 component, or device register block,
> > only the first one (of each) is checked. Previous logic checked all
> > duplicate register blocks and additionally attempted to map unused
> > register blocks if present.
> > 2. cxl_pci: No more dev_dbg for unused register blocks
>
> Why not break these out into separate patches before moving the code?
> It makes it easier to review, and it increases the precision of future
> Fixes: patches if necessary.
>
I can. Indeed it was my instinct to do so. I went against my instinct...
What are you thinking (something like...)?
1. Change register locator identifiers to enum
2. refactor cxl_pci to use the new find() function.
3. Remove map.type
4. move required functionality to core
> >
> > Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cxl/core/regs.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 3 ++
> > drivers/cxl/pci.c | 104 +++++++---------------------------------
> > drivers/cxl/pci.h | 14 +++---
> > 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> > index 41de4a136ecd..ef6164ef449f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/pci.h>
> > #include <cxlmem.h>
> > +#include <pci.h>
> >
> > /**
> > * DOC: cxl registers
> > @@ -247,3 +248,91 @@ int cxl_map_device_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cxl_map_device_regs);
> > +
> > +static void cxl_decode_register_block(u32 reg_lo, u32 reg_hi, u8 *bar,
> > + u64 *offset, u8 *reg_type)
> > +{
> > + *offset = ((u64)reg_hi << 32) | (reg_lo & CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK);
> > + *bar = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK, reg_lo);
> > + *reg_type = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK, reg_lo);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int cxl_pci_dvsec(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dvsec)
> > +{
> > + int pos;
> > +
> > + pos = pci_find_ext_capability(pdev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DVSEC);
> > + if (!pos)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + while (pos) {
> > + u16 vendor, id;
> > +
> > + pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_DVSEC_HEADER1, &vendor);
> > + pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_DVSEC_HEADER2, &id);
> > + if (vendor == PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL && dvsec == id)
> > + return pos;
> > +
> > + pos = pci_find_next_ext_capability(pdev, pos,
> > + PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DVSEC);
> > + }
>
> We punted on refactoring this for the initial driver submission
> because it was difficult to coordinate. Now that cxl.git is an
> established tree, instead of moving this it seems time to address that
> refactor that Bjorn asked about. Bjorn, would you be willing to carry
> a non-rebasing branch with such a cleanup that CXL could pull from?
>
Also here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210913190131.xiiszmno46qie7v5@intel.com/
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * cxl_get_register_block() - Find the CXL register block by identifier
> > + * @pdev: The PCI device implementing the registers
> > + * @type: Type of register block to find
> > + * @map: (Output) parameters used to map the regiseter block
>
> s/regiseter/register/
>
> > + *
> > + * If register block is found, 0 is returned and @map is populated; else returns
> > + * negative error code.
> > + */
> > +int cxl_get_register_block(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum cxl_regloc_type type,
>
> Seeing this broken out again it looks like a 'find' operation rather
> than a 'get', but not a big deal.
>
I'm okay to rename it. It also makes me realize map.type becomes a useless
field.
> > + struct cxl_register_map *map)
> > +{
> > + int regloc, i, rc = -ENODEV;
> > + u32 regloc_size, regblocks;
> > +
> > + memset(map, 0, sizeof(*map));
> > +
> > + regloc = cxl_pci_dvsec(pdev, PCI_DVSEC_ID_CXL_REGLOC_DVSEC_ID);
> > + if (!regloc)
> > + return -ENXIO;
> > +
> > + if (pci_request_mem_regions(pdev, pci_name(pdev)))
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc + PCI_DVSEC_HEADER1, ®loc_size);
> > + regloc_size = FIELD_GET(PCI_DVSEC_HEADER1_LENGTH_MASK, regloc_size);
> > +
> > + regloc += PCI_DVSEC_ID_CXL_REGLOC_BLOCK1_OFFSET;
> > + regblocks = (regloc_size - PCI_DVSEC_ID_CXL_REGLOC_BLOCK1_OFFSET) / 8;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < regblocks; i++, regloc += 8) {
> > + u32 reg_lo, reg_hi;
> > + u8 reg_type, bar;
> > + u64 offset;
> > +
> > + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc, ®_lo);
> > + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc + 4, ®_hi);
> > +
> > + cxl_decode_register_block(reg_lo, reg_hi, &bar, &offset,
> > + ®_type);
> > +
> > + if (reg_type == type) {
> > + map->barno = bar;
> > + map->block_offset = offset;
> > + map->reg_type = reg_type;
> > + rc = 0;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + pci_release_mem_regions(pdev);
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cxl_get_register_block);
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > index 7d6b011dd963..cff3b68e03e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > @@ -159,6 +159,9 @@ int cxl_map_component_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > int cxl_map_device_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > struct cxl_device_regs *regs,
> > struct cxl_register_map *map);
> > +enum cxl_regloc_type;
> > +int cxl_get_register_block(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum cxl_regloc_type type,
> > + struct cxl_register_map *map);
> >
> > #define CXL_RESOURCE_NONE ((resource_size_t) -1)
> > #define CXL_TARGET_STRLEN 20
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > index 64180f46c895..2d91e20bd088 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > @@ -337,29 +337,6 @@ static void cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, void __iomem *base)
> > pci_iounmap(to_pci_dev(cxlm->dev), base);
> > }
> >
> > -static int cxl_pci_dvsec(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dvsec)
> > -{
> > - int pos;
> > -
> > - pos = pci_find_ext_capability(pdev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DVSEC);
> > - if (!pos)
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > - while (pos) {
> > - u16 vendor, id;
> > -
> > - pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_DVSEC_HEADER1, &vendor);
> > - pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_DVSEC_HEADER2, &id);
> > - if (vendor == PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL && dvsec == id)
> > - return pos;
> > -
> > - pos = pci_find_next_ext_capability(pdev, pos,
> > - PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DVSEC);
> > - }
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int cxl_probe_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, void __iomem *base,
> > struct cxl_register_map *map)
> > {
> > @@ -420,14 +397,6 @@ static int cxl_map_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, struct cxl_register_map *map)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void cxl_decode_register_block(u32 reg_lo, u32 reg_hi,
> > - u8 *bar, u64 *offset, u8 *reg_type)
> > -{
> > - *offset = ((u64)reg_hi << 32) | (reg_lo & CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK);
> > - *bar = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK, reg_lo);
> > - *reg_type = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK, reg_lo);
> > -}
> > -
> > /**
> > * cxl_pci_setup_regs() - Setup necessary MMIO.
> > * @cxlm: The CXL memory device to communicate with.
> > @@ -440,72 +409,31 @@ static void cxl_decode_register_block(u32 reg_lo, u32 reg_hi,
> > */
> > static int cxl_pci_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
> > {
> > - void __iomem *base;
> > - u32 regloc_size, regblocks;
> > - int regloc, i, n_maps, ret = 0;
> > + int i, ret = 0;
> > struct device *dev = cxlm->dev;
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > - struct cxl_register_map *map, maps[CXL_REGLOC_RBI_TYPES];
> > -
> > - regloc = cxl_pci_dvsec(pdev, PCI_DVSEC_ID_CXL_REGLOC_DVSEC_ID);
> > - if (!regloc) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "register location dvsec not found\n");
> > - return -ENXIO;
> > - }
> > + enum cxl_regloc_type types[] = {CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV, CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT};
> >
> > - if (pci_request_mem_regions(pdev, pci_name(pdev)))
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(types); i++) {
> > + struct cxl_register_map map;
> > + void __iomem *base;
> >
> > - /* Get the size of the Register Locator DVSEC */
> > - pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc + PCI_DVSEC_HEADER1, ®loc_size);
> > - regloc_size = FIELD_GET(PCI_DVSEC_HEADER1_LENGTH_MASK, regloc_size);
> > -
> > - regloc += PCI_DVSEC_ID_CXL_REGLOC_BLOCK1_OFFSET;
> > - regblocks = (regloc_size - PCI_DVSEC_ID_CXL_REGLOC_BLOCK1_OFFSET) / 8;
> > -
> > - for (i = 0, n_maps = 0; i < regblocks; i++, regloc += 8) {
> > - u32 reg_lo, reg_hi;
> > - u8 reg_type;
> > - u64 offset;
> > - u8 bar;
> > -
> > - pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc, ®_lo);
> > - pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc + 4, ®_hi);
> > -
> > - cxl_decode_register_block(reg_lo, reg_hi, &bar, &offset,
> > - ®_type);
> > -
> > - dev_dbg(dev, "Found register block in bar %u @ 0x%llx of type %u\n",
> > - bar, offset, reg_type);
> > -
> > - /* Ignore unknown register block types */
> > - if (reg_type > CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV)
> > - continue;
> > -
> > - base = cxl_pci_map_regblock(cxlm, bar, offset);
> > - if (!base)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > - map = &maps[n_maps];
> > - map->barno = bar;
> > - map->block_offset = offset;
> > - map->reg_type = reg_type;
> > + ret = cxl_get_register_block(pdev, types[i], &map);
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> >
> > - ret = cxl_probe_regs(cxlm, base + offset, map);
> > + base = cxl_pci_map_regblock(cxlm, map.barno, map.block_offset);
> > + if (!base) {
> > + ret = -ENXIO;
> > + break;
> > + }
> >
> > - /* Always unmap the regblock regardless of probe success */
> > + ret = cxl_probe_regs(cxlm, base + map.block_offset, &map);
> > cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(cxlm, base);
> > -
> > if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > -
> > - n_maps++;
> > - }
> > -
> > - pci_release_mem_regions(pdev);
> > + break;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < n_maps; i++) {
> > - ret = cxl_map_regs(cxlm, &maps[i]);
> > + ret = cxl_map_regs(cxlm, &map);
> > if (ret)
> > break;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.h b/drivers/cxl/pci.h
> > index 8c1a58813816..7d3e4bf06b45 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.h
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.h
> > @@ -20,13 +20,15 @@
> > #define CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
> >
> > /* Register Block Identifier (RBI) */
> > -#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> > -#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_EMPTY 0
> > -#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT 1
> > -#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_VIRT 2
> > -#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV 3
> > -#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_TYPES CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV + 1
> > +enum cxl_regloc_type {
> > + CXL_REGLOC_RBI_EMPTY = 0,
> > + CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT,
> > + CXL_REGLOC_RBI_VIRT,
> > + CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV,
> > + CXL_REGLOC_RBI_TYPES
> > +};
>
> This looks like another change that can go into its own patch.
>
> >
> > +#define CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> > #define CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
> >
> > #endif /* __CXL_PCI_H__ */
> > --
> > 2.33.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-21 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-20 22:56 [PATCH] cxl: Move register block enumeration to core Ben Widawsky
2021-09-20 23:15 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-09-21 14:07 ` Dan Williams
2021-09-21 16:44 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2021-09-21 18:42 ` Dan Williams
2021-09-21 19:06 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-09-21 19:16 ` Dan Williams
2021-09-21 19:21 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-09-21 20:09 ` Dan Williams
2021-09-21 22:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210921164401.h46pjfwkpr7m2ven@intel.com \
--to=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox