Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] cxl/mbox: Move build of user mailbox cmd to a helper function
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:43:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220325104348.00002709@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220324011126.1144504-4-alison.schofield@intel.com>

On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:11:20 -0700
alison.schofield@intel.com wrote:

> From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> 
> In preparation for moving the construction of a mailbox command
> to the validation path, extract the work into a helper function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>

Some suggestions for possible improvements to code organization now
possible because everything is in one place.

Otherwise looks good to me.

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> index 28131c6f7fcf..d4233cfb2f99 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,38 @@ static bool cxl_mem_raw_command_allowed(u16 opcode)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +static int cxl_to_mbox_cmd(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
> +			   struct cxl_mbox_cmd *mbox, u16 opcode,
> +			   size_t in_size, size_t out_size, u64 in_payload)
> +{
> +	*mbox = (struct cxl_mbox_cmd) {
> +		.opcode = opcode,
> +		.size_in = in_size,
> +		.size_out = out_size,

Given we are going to possibly override this later, my inclination would
be to not set it here and instead do

	if (out_size < 0)
		mbox->size_out = cxlds->payload_size
	else
		mbox->size_out = out_size;

or
	mbox->size_out = out_size < 0 ? cxlds->payload_size : out_size;

> +	};
> +
> +	if (!in_size)
> +		goto size_out;
> +
> +	mbox->payload_in = vmemdup_user(u64_to_user_ptr(in_payload), in_size);
> +	if (!mbox->payload_in)
> +		return PTR_ERR(mbox->payload_in);
> +
> +size_out:
Why format this like this?  Using a goto to skip a couple of lines of code
is a bit ugly.

	if (in_size) {
		mbox->payload_in = vmemdup_user(u64_to_user_ptr(in_payload), in_size);
		if (!mbox->payload_in)
			return PTR_ERR(mbox->payload_in);
	}
	etc

> +	/* Prepare to handle a full payload for variable sized output */
> +	if (out_size < 0)
> +		mbox->size_out = cxlds->payload_size;
> +
> +	if (mbox->size_out) {
> +		mbox->payload_out = kvzalloc(mbox->size_out, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!mbox->payload_out) {
> +			kvfree(mbox->payload_in);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int cxl_to_mem_cmd_raw(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>  			      const struct cxl_send_command *send_cmd,
>  			      struct cxl_mem_command *mem_cmd)
> @@ -397,27 +429,13 @@ static int handle_mailbox_cmd_from_user(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>  					s32 *size_out, u32 *retval)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = cxlds->dev;
> -	struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd = {
> -		.opcode = cmd->opcode,
> -		.size_in = cmd->info.size_in,
> -		.size_out = cmd->info.size_out,
> -	};
> +	struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd;
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	if (cmd->info.size_out) {
> -		mbox_cmd.payload_out = kvzalloc(cmd->info.size_out, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!mbox_cmd.payload_out)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (cmd->info.size_in) {
> -		mbox_cmd.payload_in = vmemdup_user(u64_to_user_ptr(in_payload),
> -						   cmd->info.size_in);
> -		if (IS_ERR(mbox_cmd.payload_in)) {
> -			kvfree(mbox_cmd.payload_out);
> -			return PTR_ERR(mbox_cmd.payload_in);
> -		}
> -	}
> +	rc = cxl_to_mbox_cmd(cxlds, &mbox_cmd, cmd->opcode, cmd->info.size_in,
> +			     cmd->info.size_out, in_payload);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dev,
>  		"Submitting %s command for user\n"
> @@ -471,10 +489,6 @@ int cxl_send_cmd(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, struct cxl_send_command __user *s)
>  	if (rc)
>  		return rc;
>  
> -	/* Prepare to handle a full payload for variable sized output */
> -	if (c.info.size_out < 0)
> -		c.info.size_out = cxlds->payload_size;
> -
>  	rc = handle_mailbox_cmd_from_user(cxlds, &c, send.in.payload,
>  					  send.out.payload, &send.out.size,
>  					  &send.retval);


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-25 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-24  1:11 [PATCH v3 0/9] Do not allow set-partition immediate mode alison.schofield
2022-03-24  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] cxl/mbox: Move cxl_mem_command construction to helper funcs alison.schofield
2022-03-25 10:27   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-26  0:01     ` Alison Schofield
2022-03-24  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] cxl/mbox: Move raw command warning to raw command validation alison.schofield
2022-03-25 10:32   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-24  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] cxl/mbox: Move build of user mailbox cmd to a helper function alison.schofield
2022-03-25 10:43   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2022-03-24  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] cxl/mbox: Construct a users cxl_mbox_cmd in the validation path alison.schofield
2022-03-25 10:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-26  0:37     ` Alison Schofield
2022-03-24  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] cxl/mbox: Remove dependency on cxl_mem_command for a debug msg alison.schofield
2022-03-25 10:56   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-26  0:26     ` Alison Schofield
2022-03-24  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] cxl/mbox: Make handle_mailbox_cmd_from_user() use a mbox param alison.schofield
2022-03-25 11:04   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-26  0:25     ` Alison Schofield
2022-03-29 10:50       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-24  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] cxl/mbox: Move cxl_mem_command param to a local variable alison.schofield
2022-03-25 11:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-24  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] cxl/mbox: Block immediate mode in SET_PARTITION_INFO command alison.schofield
2022-03-25 11:18   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-26  0:31     ` Alison Schofield
2022-03-24  1:11 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] cxl/pmem: Remove CXL SET_PARTITION_INFO from exclusive_cmds list alison.schofield
2022-03-25 11:19   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-25 10:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Do not allow set-partition immediate mode Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-30  1:24   ` Dan Williams
2022-03-30 15:05     ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220325104348.00002709@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox