From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] cxl/mbox: Move cxl_mem_command param to a local variable
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:10:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220325111054.00004204@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220324011126.1144504-8-alison.schofield@intel.com>
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:11:24 -0700
alison.schofield@intel.com wrote:
> From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
>
> cxl_validate_command_from_user() is now the single point of validation
> for mailbox commands coming from user space. Previously, it returned a
> a cxl_mem_command, but that was not sufficient when validation of the
> actual mailbox command became a requirement. Now, it returns a fully
> validated cxl_mbox_cmd.
>
> Remove the extraneous cxl_mem_command parameter. Define and use a
> local version only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> index 0340399c7029..c323d6792405 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> @@ -331,10 +331,9 @@ static int cxl_to_mem_cmd(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
> }
>
> /**
> - * cxl_validate_cmd_from_user() - Check fields for CXL_MEM_SEND_COMMAND.
> + * cxl_validate_cmd_from_user() - Construct a valid cxl_mbox_cmd
> * @cxlds: The device data for the operation
> * @send_cmd: &struct cxl_send_command copied in from userspace.
> - * @out_cmd: Sanitized and populated &struct cxl_mem_command.
> * @mbox_cmd: Sanitized and populated &struct cxl_mbox_cmd.
> *
> * Return:
> @@ -345,16 +344,14 @@ static int cxl_to_mem_cmd(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
> * * %-EPERM - Attempted to use a protected command.
> * * %-EBUSY - Kernel has claimed exclusive access to this opcode
> *
> - * The result of this command is a fully validated command in @out_cmd that is
> + * The result of this command is a fully validated command in @mbox_cmd that is
> * safe to send to the hardware.
> - *
> - * See handle_mailbox_cmd_from_user()
> */
> static int cxl_validate_cmd_from_user(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
> const struct cxl_send_command *send_cmd,
> - struct cxl_mem_command *out_cmd,
> struct cxl_mbox_cmd *mbox_cmd)
> {
> + struct cxl_mem_command mem_cmd;
> int rc;
>
> if (send_cmd->id == 0 || send_cmd->id >= CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_MAX)
> @@ -370,16 +367,16 @@ static int cxl_validate_cmd_from_user(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>
> /* Sanitize and construct a cxl_mem_command */
> if (send_cmd->id == CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_RAW)
> - rc = cxl_to_mem_cmd_raw(cxlds, send_cmd, out_cmd);
> + rc = cxl_to_mem_cmd_raw(cxlds, send_cmd, &mem_cmd);
> else
> - rc = cxl_to_mem_cmd(cxlds, send_cmd, out_cmd);
> + rc = cxl_to_mem_cmd(cxlds, send_cmd, &mem_cmd);
>
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> /* Sanitize and construct a cxl_mbox_cmd */
> - rc = cxl_to_mbox_cmd(cxlds, mbox_cmd, out_cmd->opcode,
> - out_cmd->info.size_in, out_cmd->info.size_out,
> + rc = cxl_to_mbox_cmd(cxlds, mbox_cmd, mem_cmd.opcode,
> + mem_cmd.info.size_in, mem_cmd.info.size_out,
> send_cmd->in.payload);
>
> return rc;
> @@ -490,7 +487,6 @@ int cxl_send_cmd(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, struct cxl_send_command __user *s)
> struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = cxlmd->cxlds;
> struct device *dev = &cxlmd->dev;
> struct cxl_send_command send;
> - struct cxl_mem_command c;
> struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd;
> int rc;
>
> @@ -499,7 +495,7 @@ int cxl_send_cmd(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, struct cxl_send_command __user *s)
> if (copy_from_user(&send, s, sizeof(send)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - rc = cxl_validate_cmd_from_user(cxlmd->cxlds, &send, &c, &mbox_cmd);
> + rc = cxl_validate_cmd_from_user(cxlmd->cxlds, &send, &mbox_cmd);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-25 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-24 1:11 [PATCH v3 0/9] Do not allow set-partition immediate mode alison.schofield
2022-03-24 1:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] cxl/mbox: Move cxl_mem_command construction to helper funcs alison.schofield
2022-03-25 10:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-26 0:01 ` Alison Schofield
2022-03-24 1:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] cxl/mbox: Move raw command warning to raw command validation alison.schofield
2022-03-25 10:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-24 1:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] cxl/mbox: Move build of user mailbox cmd to a helper function alison.schofield
2022-03-25 10:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-24 1:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] cxl/mbox: Construct a users cxl_mbox_cmd in the validation path alison.schofield
2022-03-25 10:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-26 0:37 ` Alison Schofield
2022-03-24 1:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] cxl/mbox: Remove dependency on cxl_mem_command for a debug msg alison.schofield
2022-03-25 10:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-26 0:26 ` Alison Schofield
2022-03-24 1:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] cxl/mbox: Make handle_mailbox_cmd_from_user() use a mbox param alison.schofield
2022-03-25 11:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-26 0:25 ` Alison Schofield
2022-03-29 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-24 1:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] cxl/mbox: Move cxl_mem_command param to a local variable alison.schofield
2022-03-25 11:10 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2022-03-24 1:11 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] cxl/mbox: Block immediate mode in SET_PARTITION_INFO command alison.schofield
2022-03-25 11:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-26 0:31 ` Alison Schofield
2022-03-24 1:11 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] cxl/pmem: Remove CXL SET_PARTITION_INFO from exclusive_cmds list alison.schofield
2022-03-25 11:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-25 10:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Do not allow set-partition immediate mode Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-30 1:24 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-30 15:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220325111054.00004204@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox