From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"Gregory Price" <gregory.price@memverge.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Li, Ming" <ming4.li@intel.com>,
"Hillf Danton" <hdanton@sina.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] cxl/pci: Handle truncated CDAT entries
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:30:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230214113054.00004cb4@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b4e23f256b3705360d84eccb9652e4b558a77b5.1676043318.git.lukas@wunner.de>
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 21:25:03 +0100
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote:
> If truncated CDAT entries are received from a device, the concatenation
> of those entries constitutes a corrupt CDAT, yet is happily exposed to
> user space.
>
> Avoid by verifying response lengths and erroring out if truncation is
> detected.
>
> The last CDAT entry may still be truncated despite the checks introduced
> herein if the length in the CDAT header is too small. However, that is
> easily detectable by user space because it reaches EOF prematurely.
> A subsequent commit which rightsizes the CDAT response allocation closes
> that remaining loophole.
>
> The two lines introduced here which exceed 80 chars are shortened to
> less than 80 chars by a subsequent commit which migrates to a
> synchronous DOE API and replaces "t.task.rv" by "rc".
>
> The existing acpi_cdat_header and acpi_table_cdat struct definitions
> provided by ACPICA cannot be used because they do not employ __le16 or
> __le32 types. I believe that cannot be changed because those types are
> Linux-specific and ACPI is specified for little endian platforms only,
> hence doesn't care about endianness. So duplicate the structs.
>
> Fixes: c97006046c79 ("cxl/port: Read CDAT table")
> Tested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.0+
One trivial suggestion.
Glad to see this tightened up.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> Changes v2 -> v3:
> * Newly added patch in v3
>
> drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 13 +++++++++----
> drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> index 11a85b3a9a0b..a3fb6bd68d17 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> @@ -547,8 +547,8 @@ static int cxl_cdat_read_table(struct device *dev,
>
> do {
> DECLARE_CDAT_DOE_TASK(CDAT_DOE_REQ(entry_handle), t);
> + struct cdat_entry_header *entry;
> size_t entry_dw;
> - __le32 *entry;
> int rc;
>
> rc = pci_doe_submit_task(cdat_doe, &t.task);
> @@ -557,14 +557,19 @@ static int cxl_cdat_read_table(struct device *dev,
> return rc;
> }
> wait_for_completion(&t.c);
> - /* 1 DW header + 1 DW data min */
> - if (t.task.rv < (2 * sizeof(u32)))
> +
> + /* 1 DW Table Access Response Header + CDAT entry */
> + entry = (struct cdat_entry_header *)(t.response_pl + 1);
> + if ((entry_handle == 0 &&
> + t.task.rv != sizeof(u32) + sizeof(struct cdat_header)) ||
> + (entry_handle > 0 &&
> + (t.task.rv < sizeof(u32) + sizeof(struct cdat_entry_header) ||
Slight preference for sizeof(*entry)
so that it is clear that we are checking we can do the next check without
getting garbage.
> + t.task.rv != sizeof(u32) + le16_to_cpu(entry->length))))
> return -EIO;
>
> /* Get the CXL table access header entry handle */
> entry_handle = FIELD_GET(CXL_DOE_TABLE_ACCESS_ENTRY_HANDLE,
> le32_to_cpu(t.response_pl[0]));
> - entry = t.response_pl + 1;
> entry_dw = t.task.rv / sizeof(u32);
> /* Skip Header */
> entry_dw -= 1;
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> index 920909791bb9..104ad2b72516 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,20 @@ enum cxl_regloc_type {
> CXL_REGLOC_RBI_TYPES
> };
>
> +struct cdat_header {
> + __le32 length;
> + u8 revision;
> + u8 checksum;
> + u8 reserved[6];
> + __le32 sequence;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct cdat_entry_header {
> + u8 type;
> + u8 reserved;
> + __le16 length;
> +} __packed;
> +
> int devm_cxl_port_enumerate_dports(struct cxl_port *port);
> struct cxl_dev_state;
> int cxl_hdm_decode_init(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-10 20:25 [PATCH v3 00/16] Collection of DOE material Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] cxl/pci: Fix CDAT retrieval on big endian Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11 0:22 ` Dan Williams
2023-02-19 13:03 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-14 13:51 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 15:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-28 2:53 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28 8:24 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-28 12:08 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] cxl/pci: Handle truncated CDAT header Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11 0:40 ` Dan Williams
2023-02-11 9:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-15 1:41 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] cxl/pci: Handle truncated CDAT entries Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11 0:50 ` Dan Williams
2023-02-11 10:56 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:30 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] cxl/pci: Handle excessive CDAT length Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11 1:04 ` Dan Williams
2023-02-14 11:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-16 10:26 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-17 10:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] PCI/DOE: Silence WARN splat with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] PCI/DOE: Fix memory leak " Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11 1:06 ` Dan Williams
2023-03-01 1:51 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] PCI/DOE: Provide synchronous API and use it internally Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15 1:45 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-28 18:58 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] cxl/pci: Use synchronous API for DOE Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] PCI/DOE: Make asynchronous API private Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15 1:48 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] PCI/DOE: Deduplicate mailbox flushing Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-15 5:07 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] PCI/DOE: Allow mailbox creation without devres management Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-15 5:17 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] PCI/DOE: Create mailboxes on device enumeration Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15 2:07 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-28 1:18 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28 1:39 ` Dan Williams
2023-02-28 5:43 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-28 7:24 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28 10:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-02 20:22 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-03-07 1:55 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-04-03 0:55 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] cxl/pci: Use CDAT DOE mailbox created by PCI core Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] PCI/DOE: Make mailbox creation API private Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15 2:13 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] PCI/DOE: Relax restrictions on request and response size Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15 5:05 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-15 11:49 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] cxl/pci: Rightsize CDAT response allocation Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 13:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-16 0:56 ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-16 8:03 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-28 1:45 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28 5:55 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230214113054.00004cb4@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ming4.li@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox