From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>
Cc: <kobayashi.da-06@jp.fujitsu.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
<y-goto@fujitsu.com>, <mj@ucw.cz>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] cxl/core/regs: Add rcd_pcie_cap initialization at __rcrb_to_component()
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:35:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240611163550.00003d6f@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240611055254.61203-2-kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 14:52:53 +0900
"Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Add rcd_pcie_cap and its initialization at __rcrb_to_component() to cache
> the offset of cxl1.1 device link status information. By caching it, avoid
> the walking memory map area to find the offset when output the register
> value.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>
Hi. The basic functionality now looks good, but I'm not convinced by
the 'where' of the calls. Even though it will require an additional
ioremap/iounmap() pair I don't think you should bury this in code
doing something largely unrelated.
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/core.h | 5 +++++
> drivers/cxl/core/regs.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 9 +++++++++
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> index 3b64fb1b9ed0..66778c3ce3b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev,
> enum cxl_rcrb which);
> u16 cxl_rcrb_to_aer(struct device *dev, resource_size_t rcrb);
>
> +#define PCI_RCRB_CAP_LIST_ID_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_ID_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_NEXT_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> +#define RCRB_PCIECAP_LEN 0x3c
> +
> extern struct rw_semaphore cxl_dpa_rwsem;
> extern struct rw_semaphore cxl_region_rwsem;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> index 372786f80955..5ce831ca05ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> @@ -514,6 +514,8 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev, struct cxl_rcrb_info *ri
> u32 bar0, bar1;
> u16 cmd;
> u32 id;
> + u32 cap_hdr;
> + u16 offset;
>
> if (which == CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM)
> rcrb += SZ_4K;
> @@ -537,6 +539,19 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev, struct cxl_rcrb_info *ri
> cmd = readw(addr + PCI_COMMAND);
> bar0 = readl(addr + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
> bar1 = readl(addr + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1);
> + offset = FIELD_GET(PCI_RCRB_CAP_LIST_ID_MASK, readw(addr + PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST));
Similarly to below, this is putting unrelated functionality in __rcrb_to_component()
I think you need to be more smilar to cxl_rcrb_to_aer() which does it's
own iomap of the rcrb. That allows it to keep to doing just one thing.
So I would have a cxl_rcrb_to_lnkcap() and call that from
cxl_pci_setup_regs()
> + cap_hdr = readl(addr + offset);
> + while ((FIELD_GET(PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_ID_MASK, cap_hdr)) != PCI_CAP_ID_EXP) {
> + offset = FIELD_GET(PCI_RCRB_CAP_HDR_NEXT_MASK, cap_hdr);
> + if (offset == 0 || offset > SZ_4K) {
> + offset = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> + cap_hdr = readl(addr + offset);
> + }
> + if (offset)
> + ri->rcd_pcie_cap = offset;
> +
> iounmap(addr);
> release_mem_region(rcrb, SZ_4K);
>
> @@ -572,8 +587,18 @@ resource_size_t __rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev, struct cxl_rcrb_info *ri
> resource_size_t cxl_rcd_component_reg_phys(struct device *dev,
> struct cxl_dport *dport)
This has gone from being a 'find me one of these' function to one
that does rather more inside. Doesn't feel like the right place
to locate this capability.
I would wrap the mapping code up in a function similar to the aer_cap
code in cxl_dport_map_rch_aer() called something like
cxl_dport_map_rcd_lnkcap(), and call that directly from cxl_pci_setup_regs()
under the same check as is use for calling cxl_rcrb_get_comp_regs()
> {
> + resource_size_t rcd_pcie_offset, ret;
> +
> if (!dport->rch)
> return CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
> - return __rcrb_to_component(dev, &dport->rcrb, CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM);
> +
> + ret = __rcrb_to_component(dev, &dport->rcrb, CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM);
> + if (dport->rcrb.rcd_pcie_cap) {
> + rcd_pcie_offset = dport->rcrb.base + dport->rcrb.rcd_pcie_cap;
> + dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap = devm_cxl_iomap_block(dev, rcd_pcie_offset,
> + sizeof(u8) * RCRB_PCIECAP_LEN);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_rcd_component_reg_phys, CXL);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 003feebab79b..fc9e0dbd5932 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -230,6 +230,14 @@ struct cxl_regs {
> struct_group_tagged(cxl_rch_regs, rch_regs,
> void __iomem *dport_aer;
> );
> +
> + /*
> + * RCD upstream port specific PCIe cap register
> + * @pcie_cap: CXL 3.0 8.2.1.2 RCD Upstream Port RCRB
> + */
> + struct_group_tagged(cxl_rcd_regs, rcd_regs,
> + void __iomem *rcd_pcie_cap;
> + );
> };
>
> struct cxl_reg_map {
> @@ -646,6 +654,7 @@ cxl_find_dport_by_dev(struct cxl_port *port, const struct device *dport_dev)
>
> struct cxl_rcrb_info {
> resource_size_t base;
> + u16 rcd_pcie_cap;
> u16 aer_cap;
> };
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-11 5:52 [PATCH v10 0/2] Export cxl1.1 device link status register value to pci device sysfs Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-11 5:52 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] cxl/core/regs: Add rcd_pcie_cap initialization at __rcrb_to_component() Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-11 15:35 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-06-11 5:52 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] cxl/pci: Add sysfs attribute for CXL 1.1 device link status Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-11 15:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240611163550.00003d6f@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com \
--cc=kobayashi.da-06@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mj@ucw.cz \
--cc=y-goto@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox