Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>
Cc: <kobayashi.da-06@jp.fujitsu.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	<y-goto@fujitsu.com>, <mj@ucw.cz>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] cxl/pci: Add sysfs attribute for CXL 1.1 device link status
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:40:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240611164006.000059b9@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240611055254.61203-3-kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>

On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 14:52:54 +0900
"Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Add sysfs attribute for CXL 1.1 device link status to the cxl pci device.
> 
> In CXL1.1, the link status of the device is included in the RCRB mapped to
> the memory mapped register area. Critically, that arrangement makes the
> link status and control registers invisible to existing PCI user tooling.
> 
> Export those registers via sysfs with the expectation that PCI user
> tooling will alternatively look for these sysfs files when attempting to
> access to these CXL 1.1 endpoints registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: "Kobayashi,Daisuke" <kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com>
Hi. 

Can go one step further without hurting readability much.

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/cxl/pci.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> index 2ff361e756d6..655616a16892 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> @@ -786,6 +786,103 @@ static int cxl_event_config(struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t rcd_pcie_cap_emitl(struct device *dev, u16 offset, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = cxlds->cxlmd;
> +	struct device *endpoint_parent;
> +	struct cxl_dport *dport;
> +	struct cxl_port *port;
> +
> +	port = cxl_mem_find_port(cxlmd, &dport);
> +	if (!port)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	endpoint_parent = port->uport_dev;
> +	if (!endpoint_parent)
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	guard(device)(endpoint_parent);
> +	if (!endpoint_parent->driver)
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	if (dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap == NULL)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%x\n", readl(dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap + offset));

I'd create an extra function called form both of these called from these with
a size parameter that select between the last two lines.

rcd_pcie_cap_emit(struct device *dev, u16 offset, char *buf, size_t width)
{
....
	switch (width) {
	case 2:
		return sysfs_emit(buf, "%x\n",
				  readw(dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap + offset));
	case 4:
		return sysfs_emit(buf, "%x\n",
				  readl(dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap + offset));
	default:
		return -EINVAL;
	} 
}
Then call that from the wrappers with appropriate size parameter.

> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t rcd_pcie_cap_emitw(struct device *dev, u16 offset, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = cxlds->cxlmd;
> +	struct device *endpoint_parent;
> +	struct cxl_dport *dport;
> +	struct cxl_port *port;
> +
> +	port = cxl_mem_find_port(cxlmd, &dport);
> +	if (!port)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	endpoint_parent = port->uport_dev;
> +	if (!endpoint_parent)
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	guard(device)(endpoint_parent);
> +	if (!endpoint_parent->driver)
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	if (dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap == NULL)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%x\n", readw(dport->regs.rcd_pcie_cap + offset));
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t rcd_link_cap_show(struct device *dev,
> +				 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	return rcd_pcie_cap_emitl(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, buf);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rcd_link_cap);
> +
> +static ssize_t rcd_link_ctrl_show(struct device *dev,
> +				  struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	return rcd_pcie_cap_emitw(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, buf);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rcd_link_ctrl);
> +
> +static ssize_t rcd_link_status_show(struct device *dev,
> +				    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	return rcd_pcie_cap_emitw(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, buf);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rcd_link_status);
> +
> +static struct attribute *cxl_rcd_attrs[] = {
> +	&dev_attr_rcd_link_cap.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_rcd_link_ctrl.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_rcd_link_status.attr,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
> +static umode_t cxl_rcd_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a, int n)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> +	if (is_cxl_restricted(pdev))
> +		return a->mode;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct attribute_group cxl_rcd_group = {
> +	.attrs = cxl_rcd_attrs,
> +	.is_visible = cxl_rcd_visible,
> +};
> +__ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(cxl_rcd);
> +
>  static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  {
>  	struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(pdev->bus);
> @@ -969,6 +1066,7 @@ static struct pci_driver cxl_pci_driver = {
>  	.id_table		= cxl_mem_pci_tbl,
>  	.probe			= cxl_pci_probe,
>  	.err_handler		= &cxl_error_handlers,
> +	.dev_groups		= cxl_rcd_groups,
>  	.driver	= {
>  		.probe_type	= PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
>  	},


      reply	other threads:[~2024-06-11 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-11  5:52 [PATCH v10 0/2] Export cxl1.1 device link status register value to pci device sysfs Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-11  5:52 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] cxl/core/regs: Add rcd_pcie_cap initialization at __rcrb_to_component() Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-11 15:35   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-11  5:52 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] cxl/pci: Add sysfs attribute for CXL 1.1 device link status Kobayashi,Daisuke
2024-06-11 15:40   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240611164006.000059b9@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=kobayashi.da-06@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kobayashi.da-06@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mj@ucw.cz \
    --cc=y-goto@fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox