From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
<jgg@nvidia.com>, <shiju.jose@huawei.com>, <saeed@kernel.org>,
Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/14] cxl: Add support to handle user feature commands for get feature
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:57:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250219175755.00003953@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250218225721.2682235-11-dave.jiang@intel.com>
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:54:39 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
> Add helper function to parse the user data from fwctl RPC ioctl and
> send the parsed input parameters to cxl_get_feature() call.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> v6:
> - adjust for embedded input payload
> - move get_feature bits here from previous patch
One of those flexible arrays gets used here I see.. If
this is first place it is needed maybe drag the definition into
here?
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/features.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/uapi/fwctl/cxl.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/features.c b/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> index 106ea9e25c82..ec0e3ace1803 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> @@ -427,6 +427,47 @@ static void *cxlctl_get_supported_features(struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs,
> return no_free_ptr(rpc_out);
> }
>
> +static void *cxlctl_get_feature(struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs,
> + const struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *rpc_in,
> + size_t *out_len)
> +{
> + struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox = &cxlfs->cxlds->cxl_mbox;
> + const struct cxl_mbox_get_feat_in *feat_in;
> + u16 offset, count, return_code;
> + size_t out_size = *out_len;
> +
> + if (rpc_in->op_size != sizeof(*feat_in))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + feat_in = &rpc_in->get_feat_in;
> + offset = le16_to_cpu(feat_in->offset);
> + count = le16_to_cpu(feat_in->count);
> +
> + if (!count)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out *rpc_out __free(kvfree) =
> + kvzalloc(out_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rpc_out)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + out_size = cxl_get_feature(cxl_mbox, &feat_in->uuid,
> + feat_in->selection, rpc_out->payload,
Ah. You are using the flexible array here to provide a void *
That's fine but maybe drag defining it into this patch.
> + count, offset, &return_code);
> + *out_len = sizeof(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out);
> + if (!out_size) {
> + rpc_out->size = 0;
> + rpc_out->retval = return_code;
> + return no_free_ptr(rpc_out);
> + }
> +
> + rpc_out->size = out_size;
> + rpc_out->retval = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS;
> + *out_len += out_size;
> +
> + return no_free_ptr(rpc_out);
> +}
> +
> static bool cxlctl_validate_hw_command(struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs,
> const struct fwctl_rpc_cxl *rpc_in,
> enum fwctl_rpc_scope scope,
> @@ -436,6 +477,7 @@ static bool cxlctl_validate_hw_command(struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs,
>
> switch (opcode) {
> case CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES:
> + case CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_FEATURE:
> if (cxl_mbox->feat_cap < CXL_FEATURES_RO)
> return false;
> if (scope >= FWCTL_RPC_CONFIGURATION)
> @@ -453,6 +495,8 @@ static void *cxlctl_handle_commands(struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs,
> switch (opcode) {
> case CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES:
> return cxlctl_get_supported_features(cxlfs, rpc_in, out_len);
> + case CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_FEATURE:
> + return cxlctl_get_feature(cxlfs, rpc_in, out_len);
> default:
> return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> }
> diff --git a/include/uapi/fwctl/cxl.h b/include/uapi/fwctl/cxl.h
> index 39996ec56816..07b7e5bab461 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/fwctl/cxl.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/fwctl/cxl.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>
> struct cxl_mbox_get_sup_feats_in;
> struct cxl_mbox_get_sup_feats_out;
> +struct cxl_mbox_get_feat_in;
>
> /**
> * struct fwctl_rpc_cxl - ioctl(FWCTL_RPC) input for CXL
> @@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ struct cxl_mbox_get_sup_feats_out;
> * @op_size: Size of input payload.
> * @reserved1: Reserved. Must be 0s.
> * @get_sup_feats_in: Get Supported Features input
> + * @get_feat_in: Get Feature input
> * @op: hardware operation input byte array
> */
> struct fwctl_rpc_cxl {
> @@ -32,6 +34,7 @@ struct fwctl_rpc_cxl {
> );
> union {
> struct cxl_mbox_get_sup_feats_in get_sup_feats_in;
> + struct cxl_mbox_get_feat_in get_feat_in;
> __DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(__u8, op);
> };
> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-19 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-18 22:54 [PATCH v6 00/14] cxl: Add CXL feature commands support via fwctl Dave Jiang
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] cxl: Enumerate feature commands Dave Jiang
2025-02-20 15:37 ` Shiju Jose
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] cxl: Add Get Supported Features command for kernel usage Dave Jiang
2025-02-20 15:37 ` Shiju Jose
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] cxl/test: Add Get Supported Features mailbox command support Dave Jiang
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] cxl/mbox: Add GET_FEATURE mailbox command Dave Jiang
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] cxl/mbox: Add SET_FEATURE " Dave Jiang
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] cxl: Setup exclusive CXL features that are reserved for the kernel Dave Jiang
2025-02-20 15:37 ` Shiju Jose
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] cxl: Add FWCTL support to CXL Dave Jiang
2025-02-19 7:25 ` Li Ming
2025-02-19 17:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] cxl: Move cxl feature command structs to user header Dave Jiang
2025-02-19 7:26 ` Li Ming
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] cxl: Add support for fwctl RPC command to enable CXL feature commands Dave Jiang
2025-02-19 7:27 ` Li Ming
2025-02-19 17:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-19 17:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-19 18:00 ` Dave Jiang
2025-02-19 18:29 ` Dave Jiang
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] cxl: Add support to handle user feature commands for get feature Dave Jiang
2025-02-19 17:57 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] cxl: Add support to handle user feature commands for set feature Dave Jiang
2025-02-19 18:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-19 18:31 ` Dave Jiang
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 12/14] cxl/test: Add Get Feature support to cxl_test Dave Jiang
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] cxl/test: Add Set " Dave Jiang
2025-02-18 22:54 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] fwctl/cxl: Add documentation to FWCTL CXL Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250219175755.00003953@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox