From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "John Groves" <john@jagalactic.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/9] dax/fsdev: don't leave a dangling dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2026 19:44:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260607194447.134E41F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0100019ea3939aab-4a2fe020-b29c-4648-ad01-08b091ef9627-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The identical dangling pointer bug that causes permanent probe failure and was fixed in `fsdev.c` still exists in `dev_dax_probe` within `drivers/dax/device.c`.
--
commit 4bfae7ab5cd902255b5838eb3c590fffc93926ef
Author: John Groves <John@Groves.net>
dax/fsdev: don't leave a dangling dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure
This commit fixes a bug in fsdev.c where dev_dax->pgmap was left dangling
if a probe failed after allocation. It defers assigning dev_dax->pgmap
until the probe can no longer fail.
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> index dbd722ed7ab05..0fd5e1293d725 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -339,7 +354,13 @@ static int fsdev_dax_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
> return rc;
>
> run_dax(dax_dev);
> - return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, fsdev_kill, dev_dax);
> + rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, fsdev_kill, dev_dax);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + /* Probe can no longer fail; expose the pgmap via dev_dax */
> + dev_dax->pgmap = pgmap;
> + return 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the same dangling pointer bug still
exist in dev_dax_probe() in drivers/dax/device.c?
The identical pattern of assigning dev_dax->pgmap immediately after the
devm_kzalloc() allocation appears to be present there:
drivers/dax/device.c:dev_dax_probe() {
...
pgmap = devm_kzalloc(dev, ...);
if (!pgmap)
return -ENOMEM;
dev_dax->pgmap = pgmap;
...
}
If a later step in the probe fails (such as devm_request_mem_region() or
devm_memremap_pages()), the devres framework automatically frees the
allocated pgmap. Since the cleanup action is only registered at the end of
a successful probe, the error paths leave the pointer dangling.
Would subsequent attempts to probe the driver then hit the check for
dev_dax->pgmap and erroneously fail with -EINVAL, permanently preventing
successful device binding? Does device.c need a similar fix?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/0100019ea3929225-a0f8e6f7-30ae-4f8e-ae6f-19129666c4c3-000000@email.amazonses.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-07 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260607193224.94244-1-john@jagalactic.com>
2026-06-07 19:32 ` [PATCH V4 0/9] Fixes to the previously-merged drivers/dax/fsdev series John Groves
2026-06-07 19:33 ` [PATCH V4 1/9] dax: fix misleading comment about share/index union in dax_folio_reset_order() John Groves
2026-06-07 19:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 19:33 ` [PATCH V4 2/9] dax/fsdev: fix multi-range offset in memory_failure handler John Groves
2026-06-07 19:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 10:56 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-11 16:59 ` John Groves
2026-06-07 19:33 ` [PATCH V4 3/9] dax/fsdev: clear vmemmap_shift when binding static pgmap John Groves
2026-06-07 19:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 19:33 ` [PATCH V4 4/9] dax/fsdev: don't leave a dangling dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure John Groves
2026-06-07 19:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-08 21:30 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-07 19:33 ` [PATCH V4 5/9] dax/fsdev: use __va(phys) for kaddr in direct_access John Groves
2026-06-07 19:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 19:34 ` [PATCH V4 6/9] dax/fsdev: fail probe on invalid pgmap offset John Groves
2026-06-07 19:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 21:39 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-07 19:34 ` [PATCH V4 7/9] dax: fix holder_ops race in fs_put_dax() John Groves
2026-06-07 19:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 10:52 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-11 17:01 ` John Groves
2026-06-07 19:34 ` [PATCH V4 8/9] dax: replace exported dax_dev_get() with non-allocating dax_dev_find() John Groves
2026-06-07 19:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 10:48 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-07 19:34 ` [PATCH V4 9/9] dax: fsdev.c minor formatting cleanup John Groves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260607194447.134E41F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=john@jagalactic.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox