From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "John Groves" <john@jagalactic.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/9] dax/fsdev: clear vmemmap_shift when binding static pgmap
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2026 19:49:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260607194922.BC5561F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0100019ea39374a8-bfa199e6-bd3a-45c6-acf1-9212be962224-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Dangling `pgmap->ops` and `pgmap->owner` function pointers cause Use-After-Free/Panic upon memory failure.
- [High] Stale `vmemmap_shift` in `device_dax` when rebinding static DAX devices with reduced alignment.
- [High] Re-initializing active `cdev` structure in probe leads to Use-After-Free and list corruption.
--
commit 98c8cbe94424d5d0c2736d9ed4d3c34493e26f6a
Author: John Groves <John@Groves.net>
dax/fsdev: clear vmemmap_shift when binding static pgmap
This commit explicitly zeros pgmap->vmemmap_shift for static dax devices
before calling devm_memremap_pages() in fsdev_dax. This ensures the
vmemmap is correctly built for order-0 folios, clearing any stale shift
value left behind when rebinding from device_dax.
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> index f315533b299e9..dbd722ed7ab05 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ static int fsdev_dax_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
> }
>
> pgmap = dev_dax->pgmap;
> + pgmap->vmemmap_shift = 0;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does drivers/dax/device.c
also need this fix?
In device.c:dev_dax_probe(), vmemmap_shift is updated conditionally:
if (dev_dax->align > PAGE_SIZE)
pgmap->vmemmap_shift =
order_base_2(dev_dax->align >> PAGE_SHIFT);
If a static dax device is bound with an alignment greater than PAGE_SIZE,
unbound, has its alignment reduced to PAGE_SIZE via sysfs, and then rebound
to device_dax, it seems vmemmap_shift is not cleared and retains its stale
value.
Could this cause devm_memremap_pages() to erroneously build compound folios
for an order-0 dax device?
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does rebinding between fsdev_dax and
device_dax leave dangling pointers in the shared pgmap?
When fsdev_dax binds to the pgmap, it populates its module-specific
callbacks:
drivers/dax/fsdev.c:fsdev_dax_probe() {
...
pgmap->ops = &fsdev_pagemap_ops;
pgmap->owner = dev_dax;
...
}
If the device is later rebound to device_dax, dev_dax_probe() only updates
pgmap->type and does not appear to clear pgmap->ops or pgmap->owner:
drivers/dax/device.c:dev_dax_probe() {
...
pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_GENERIC;
...
}
If fsdev_dax is then unloaded and a memory failure occurs, could
memory_failure() invoke the dangling pgmap->ops->memory_failure() pointer,
resulting in a use-after-free and kernel panic?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does calling cdev_init() during probe
risk list corruption and use-after-free if the vfs still holds references?
Both fsdev_dax_probe() and dev_dax_probe() call cdev_init() on the cdev
embedded within the long-lived dax_device structure:
drivers/dax/fsdev.c:fsdev_dax_probe() {
...
cdev = inode->i_cdev;
cdev_init(cdev, &fsdev_fops);
...
}
If the driver is unbound and rebound while userspace still holds open file
descriptors for the device, the vfs maintains references to the cdev.
Doesn't cdev_init() zero-initialize the cdev and re-initialize its kobject,
overwriting the active reference count and clearing cdev->list?
> } else {
> size_t pgmap_size;
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/0100019ea3929225-a0f8e6f7-30ae-4f8e-ae6f-19129666c4c3-000000@email.amazonses.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-07 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260607193224.94244-1-john@jagalactic.com>
2026-06-07 19:32 ` [PATCH V4 0/9] Fixes to the previously-merged drivers/dax/fsdev series John Groves
2026-06-07 19:33 ` [PATCH V4 1/9] dax: fix misleading comment about share/index union in dax_folio_reset_order() John Groves
2026-06-07 19:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 19:33 ` [PATCH V4 2/9] dax/fsdev: fix multi-range offset in memory_failure handler John Groves
2026-06-07 19:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 10:56 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-11 16:59 ` John Groves
2026-06-07 19:33 ` [PATCH V4 3/9] dax/fsdev: clear vmemmap_shift when binding static pgmap John Groves
2026-06-07 19:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-07 19:33 ` [PATCH V4 4/9] dax/fsdev: don't leave a dangling dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure John Groves
2026-06-07 19:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 21:30 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-07 19:33 ` [PATCH V4 5/9] dax/fsdev: use __va(phys) for kaddr in direct_access John Groves
2026-06-07 19:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 19:34 ` [PATCH V4 6/9] dax/fsdev: fail probe on invalid pgmap offset John Groves
2026-06-07 19:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 21:39 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-07 19:34 ` [PATCH V4 7/9] dax: fix holder_ops race in fs_put_dax() John Groves
2026-06-07 19:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 10:52 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-11 17:01 ` John Groves
2026-06-07 19:34 ` [PATCH V4 8/9] dax: replace exported dax_dev_get() with non-allocating dax_dev_find() John Groves
2026-06-07 19:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 10:48 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-07 19:34 ` [PATCH V4 9/9] dax: fsdev.c minor formatting cleanup John Groves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260607194922.BC5561F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=john@jagalactic.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox