From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] efi/cper: Reject CPER records with an out-of-range error_data_length
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:52:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260827205213.B56E11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827203726.3027541-2-dave.jiang@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing lower bounds check for the section header in `cper_estatus_check()` allows out-of-bounds reads when iterating truncated CPER records.
--
commit 2032c31f790eb3dad96643cacd189ae773ea581e
Author: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
efi/cper: Reject CPER records with an out-of-range error_data_length
This commit modifies the size validation in cper_estatus_check to use
check_add_overflow. It addresses an issue where a large error_data_length
could wrap around as a signed int, bypassing the original size checks and
causing an infinite loop or out-of-bounds access.
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260714231835.303081-1-dave.jiang@intel.com?part=1
Fixes: 45b14a4ffcc1 ("efi: cper: Fix possible out-of-bounds access")
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index 06b4fdb59917a..332c78f2d5617 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -762,10 +762,18 @@ int cper_estatus_check(const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
> data_len = estatus->data_length;
>
> apei_estatus_for_each_section(estatus, gdata) {
> - if (acpi_hest_get_size(gdata) > data_len)
> + int record_size;
> +
> + /*
> + * The <acpi/ghes.h> helpers sum these as a signed int, so a
> + * huge error_data_length wraps small rather than large and the
> + * walk then advances by that wrapped value. Reject a size an
> + * int cannot carry.
> + */
> + if (check_add_overflow(acpi_hest_get_size(gdata),
> + gdata->error_data_length, &record_size))
> return -EINVAL;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code risk an out-of-bounds read
if the CPER record is truncated?
The apei_estatus_for_each_section loop condition only checks if the start of
the section is within estatus->data_length.
If a truncated record leaves fewer than sizeof(struct acpi_hest_generic_data)
bytes for the final section, the loop will still iterate.
Inside the loop, acpi_hest_get_size(gdata) reads gdata->revision, and
check_add_overflow reads gdata->error_data_length before confirming if
data_len actually has enough space for the struct header itself.
Could this result in page faults or memory corruption if malformed firmware
leaves us with a truncated section header?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260827203726.3027541-1-dave.jiang@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 20:37 [PATCH v5 00/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Collection of fixes for issues reported by sashiko Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] efi/cper: Reject CPER records with an out-of-range error_data_length Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] efi/cper: Reject an error status block length that wraps a u32 Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] ACPI: extlog: Validate elog record length before walking sections Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] ACPI: extlog: Defer CXL protocol error handling to avoid lock inversion Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] ACPI: extlog: Avoid populating software AER metadata from raw hardware buffer Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 23:06 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] ACPI: extlog: Validate PCIe error section length before payload access Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] ACPI: extlog: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER guard typo Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Bound CXL event record copy to the firmware section length Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate CXL protocol error section length before RAS cap copy Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] efi/cper: Read only validated fields in cper_mem_err_pack() Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate memory error section length before payload access Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 21:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Bound AER info copy and sanitize software metadata Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 21:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 20:37 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] cxl/ras: Make cxl_cper_handle_prot_err() static Dave Jiang
2026-08-27 20:59 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260827205213.B56E11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox