From: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@intel.com>
To: Shrihari E S <shrihari.s@samsung.com>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, fan.ni@samsung.com, mst@redhat.com,
marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
arun.george@samsung.com, dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com,
s.neeraj@samsung.com, vikash.k5@samsung.com, cpgs@samsung.com,
gost.dev@samsung.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 08/10] hw/pci: Add PCIe Device3 capability support
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:22:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830072235.399551-1-junjie.cao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2044366277.121787732104098.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1new>
Hi Shrihari,
On Wed, 26 Aug 2026 11:04:08 +0530, Shrihari E S wrote:
> + /*
> + * A UIO requester must be able to issue DMA transactions.
> + * Enable PCI_COMMAND_MASTER in the PCI command register so the
> + * device's bus master bit is set when the requester capability
> + * is advertised.
> + */
> + pci_set_word(dev->config + PCI_COMMAND,
> + pci_get_word(dev->config + PCI_COMMAND) |
> + PCI_COMMAND_MASTER);
As posted this is dead code -- the series' only caller, in 09/10,
passes uio_req=false (the type3 is wired as completer only). If a
requester shows up later, the write still doesn't do what the comment
wants: pci_do_device_reset() clears the writable COMMAND bits, so on
cold boot the machine reset discards it before the guest runs. On a
hotplug path there is no bus reset, and pci_qdev_realize() ends in
pci_set_power() -> pci_set_enabled() -> pci_set_master(), so there the
write does take effect and the device surfaces with bus mastering
already on. Bus master enable stays under firmware/OS control; I'd
drop the write.
The Dev3 defines already exist in Linux, and they reached QEMU in
January: 49f6b93d0752 ("linux-headers: Update to Linux v6.19-rc1") put
PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DEV3 0x2F into
include/standard-headers/linux/pci_regs.h. The cxl-2026-01-09-draft
base predates that sync, which is why this builds here; on master the
0x2f added to pcie_regs.h redefines it, and pcie.h pulls both headers
into the same TU, so that's a redefinition warning under the default
-Werror. The register offsets don't collide -- PCI_DEV3_CAP_OFFSET
here against the header's PCI_DEV3_CAP -- so PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DEV3 is the
one to drop. SVC is the other case: 0x35 genuinely isn't in the kernel
header yet.
Many thanks,
Junjie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20260826052014epcas5p11846c6a40fcec4ec4ba441ceb26e5dcc@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
[not found] ` <20260826053410.1322176-1-shrihari.s@samsung.com>
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 01/10] hw/pci: Refactor flitmode from PCIESlot to PCIEPort Shrihari E S
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 02/10] hw/pci: Move 'x-256b-flit' property from cxl_root_port to pcie_root_port Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:20 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 03/10] hw/pci: Add SVC capability and UIO properties to PCIe ports Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:20 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 04/10] hw/cxl: Add Streamlined Virtual Channel (SVC) property to CXL ports Shrihari E S
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 05/10] hw/cxl: Wire UIO capability into HDM decoder and DVSEC registers Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:21 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 06/10] hw/pci: Add PCIe Streamlined Virtual Channel (SVC) capability Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:21 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 07/10] hw/pci: hw/cxl: Wire SVC initialization into port realize functions Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:22 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 08/10] hw/pci: Add PCIe Device3 capability support Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:22 ` Junjie Cao [this message]
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 09/10] hw/cxl: Wire SVC and Dev3 capability to CXL Type 3 device Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:23 ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 10/10] cxl: Add documentation for CXL UIO support Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:23 ` Junjie Cao
[not found] <CGME20260826051958epcas5p3db6cf2ef9115168c5d8dcec7bdb9b8c3@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2026-08-26 5:34 ` [RFC V2 0/9] hw/pci: hw/cxl: Add UIO support in CXL and PCIe stack Shrihari E S
2026-08-30 7:19 ` Junjie Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830072235.399551-1-junjie.cao@intel.com \
--to=junjie.cao@intel.com \
--cc=arun.george@samsung.com \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com \
--cc=fan.ni@samsung.com \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=s.neeraj@samsung.com \
--cc=shrihari.s@samsung.com \
--cc=vikash.k5@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox