Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@intel.com>
To: Shrihari E S <shrihari.s@samsung.com>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, fan.ni@samsung.com, mst@redhat.com,
	marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
	arun.george@samsung.com, dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com,
	s.neeraj@samsung.com, vikash.k5@samsung.com, cpgs@samsung.com,
	gost.dev@samsung.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 08/10] hw/pci: Add PCIe Device3 capability support
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:22:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830072235.399551-1-junjie.cao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2044366277.121787732104098.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1new>

Hi Shrihari,

On Wed, 26 Aug 2026 11:04:08 +0530, Shrihari E S wrote:
> +        /*
> +         * A UIO requester must be able to issue DMA transactions.
> +         * Enable PCI_COMMAND_MASTER in the PCI command register so the
> +         * device's bus master bit is set when the requester capability
> +         * is advertised.
> +         */
> +        pci_set_word(dev->config + PCI_COMMAND,
> +                     pci_get_word(dev->config + PCI_COMMAND) |
> +                     PCI_COMMAND_MASTER);

As posted this is dead code -- the series' only caller, in 09/10,
passes uio_req=false (the type3 is wired as completer only).  If a
requester shows up later, the write still doesn't do what the comment
wants: pci_do_device_reset() clears the writable COMMAND bits, so on
cold boot the machine reset discards it before the guest runs.  On a
hotplug path there is no bus reset, and pci_qdev_realize() ends in
pci_set_power() -> pci_set_enabled() -> pci_set_master(), so there the
write does take effect and the device surfaces with bus mastering
already on.  Bus master enable stays under firmware/OS control; I'd
drop the write.

The Dev3 defines already exist in Linux, and they reached QEMU in
January: 49f6b93d0752 ("linux-headers: Update to Linux v6.19-rc1") put
PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DEV3 0x2F into
include/standard-headers/linux/pci_regs.h.  The cxl-2026-01-09-draft
base predates that sync, which is why this builds here; on master the
0x2f added to pcie_regs.h redefines it, and pcie.h pulls both headers
into the same TU, so that's a redefinition warning under the default
-Werror.  The register offsets don't collide -- PCI_DEV3_CAP_OFFSET
here against the header's PCI_DEV3_CAP -- so PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DEV3 is the
one to drop.  SVC is the other case: 0x35 genuinely isn't in the kernel
header yet.

Many thanks,
Junjie

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-30  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20260826052014epcas5p11846c6a40fcec4ec4ba441ceb26e5dcc@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
     [not found] ` <20260826053410.1322176-1-shrihari.s@samsung.com>
2026-08-26  5:34   ` [RFC V2 01/10] hw/pci: Refactor flitmode from PCIESlot to PCIEPort Shrihari E S
2026-08-26  5:34   ` [RFC V2 02/10] hw/pci: Move 'x-256b-flit' property from cxl_root_port to pcie_root_port Shrihari E S
2026-08-30  7:20     ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26  5:34   ` [RFC V2 03/10] hw/pci: Add SVC capability and UIO properties to PCIe ports Shrihari E S
2026-08-30  7:20     ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26  5:34   ` [RFC V2 04/10] hw/cxl: Add Streamlined Virtual Channel (SVC) property to CXL ports Shrihari E S
2026-08-26  5:34   ` [RFC V2 05/10] hw/cxl: Wire UIO capability into HDM decoder and DVSEC registers Shrihari E S
2026-08-30  7:21     ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26  5:34   ` [RFC V2 06/10] hw/pci: Add PCIe Streamlined Virtual Channel (SVC) capability Shrihari E S
2026-08-30  7:21     ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26  5:34   ` [RFC V2 07/10] hw/pci: hw/cxl: Wire SVC initialization into port realize functions Shrihari E S
2026-08-30  7:22     ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26  5:34   ` [RFC V2 08/10] hw/pci: Add PCIe Device3 capability support Shrihari E S
2026-08-30  7:22     ` Junjie Cao [this message]
2026-08-26  5:34   ` [RFC V2 09/10] hw/cxl: Wire SVC and Dev3 capability to CXL Type 3 device Shrihari E S
2026-08-30  7:23     ` Junjie Cao
2026-08-26  5:34   ` [RFC V2 10/10] cxl: Add documentation for CXL UIO support Shrihari E S
2026-08-30  7:23     ` Junjie Cao
     [not found] <CGME20260826051958epcas5p3db6cf2ef9115168c5d8dcec7bdb9b8c3@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2026-08-26  5:34 ` [RFC V2 0/9] hw/pci: hw/cxl: Add UIO support in CXL and PCIe stack Shrihari E S
2026-08-30  7:19   ` Junjie Cao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260830072235.399551-1-junjie.cao@intel.com \
    --to=junjie.cao@intel.com \
    --cc=arun.george@samsung.com \
    --cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com \
    --cc=fan.ni@samsung.com \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=s.neeraj@samsung.com \
    --cc=shrihari.s@samsung.com \
    --cc=vikash.k5@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox