Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com>
To: dan.j.williams@intel.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
	jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
	alison.schofield@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
	ira.weiny@intel.com, Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>
Cc: a.manzanares@samsung.com, nifan.cxl@gmail.com,
	anisa.su@samsung.com, vishak.g@samsung.com,
	krish.reddy@samsung.com, arun.george@samsung.com,
	alok.rathore@samsung.com, s.neeraj@samsung.com,
	neeraj.kernel@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
	gost.dev@samsung.com, cpgs@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/20] nvdimm/region_label: Add region label updation routine
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:53:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2354653.gBsaNRSFpC@fdefranc-mobl3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1690859824.141750165204442.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1new>

On Tuesday, June 17, 2025 2:39:29 PM Central European Summer Time Neeraj Kumar wrote:
> Added __pmem_region_label_update region label update routine to update
> region label
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvdimm/label.c          | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/nvdimm/label.h          |   2 +
>  drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c |  12 +++
>  drivers/nvdimm/nd.h             |  20 +++++
>  include/linux/libnvdimm.h       |   8 ++
>  5 files changed, 184 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
> index d5cfaa99f976..7f33d14ce0ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
> @@ -381,6 +381,16 @@ static void nsl_calculate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  	nsl_set_checksum(ndd, nd_label, sum);
>  }
>  
> +static void rgl_calculate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
> +				   struct cxl_region_label *rg_label)
> +{
> +	u64 sum;
> +
> +	rgl_set_checksum(rg_label, 0);
> +	sum = nd_fletcher64(rg_label, sizeof_namespace_label(ndd), 1);
> +	rgl_set_checksum(rg_label, sum);
> +}
> +
>  static bool slot_valid(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  		struct nd_lsa_label *nd_label, u32 slot)
>  {
> @@ -1117,6 +1127,138 @@ int nd_pmem_namespace_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int __pmem_region_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
> +		struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, int pos, unsigned long flags)

Hi Neeraj,

I've noticed that __pmem_region_label_update() shares many similarities 
with the existing __pmem_label_update().

> +{
> +	struct nd_interleave_set *nd_set = nd_region->nd_set;
> +	struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping);
> +	struct nd_lsa_label *nd_label;
> +	struct cxl_region_label *rg_label;
> +	struct nd_namespace_index *nsindex;
> +	struct nd_label_ent *label_ent;
> +	unsigned long *free;
> +	u32 nslot, slot;
> +	size_t offset;
> +	int rc;
> +	uuid_t tmp;
> +
> +	if (!preamble_next(ndd, &nsindex, &free, &nslot))
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	/* allocate and write the label to the staging (next) index */
> +	slot = nd_label_alloc_slot(ndd);
> +	if (slot == UINT_MAX)
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +	dev_dbg(ndd->dev, "allocated: %d\n", slot);
> +
> +	nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
> +
> +	memset(nd_label, 0, sizeof_namespace_label(ndd));
> +	rg_label = &nd_label->rg_label;
> +
> +	/* Set Region Label Format identification UUID */
> +	uuid_parse(CXL_REGION_UUID, &tmp);
> +	export_uuid(nd_label->rg_label.type, &tmp);
> +
> +	/* Set Current Region Label UUID */
> +	export_uuid(nd_label->rg_label.uuid, &nd_set->uuid);
> +
> +	rg_label->flags = __cpu_to_le32(flags);
> +	rg_label->nlabel = __cpu_to_le16(nd_region->ndr_mappings);
> +	rg_label->position = __cpu_to_le16(pos);
> +	rg_label->dpa = __cpu_to_le64(nd_mapping->start);
> +	rg_label->rawsize = __cpu_to_le64(nd_mapping->size);
> +	rg_label->hpa = __cpu_to_le64(nd_set->res->start);
> +	rg_label->slot = __cpu_to_le32(slot);
> +	rg_label->ig = __cpu_to_le32(nd_set->interleave_granularity);
> +	rg_label->align = __cpu_to_le16(0);
> +
> +	/* Update fletcher64 Checksum */
> +	rgl_calculate_checksum(ndd, rg_label);
> +
> +	/* update label */
> +	offset = nd_label_offset(ndd, nd_label);
> +	rc = nvdimm_set_config_data(ndd, offset, nd_label,
> +			sizeof_namespace_label(ndd));
> +	if (rc < 0) {
> +		nd_label_free_slot(ndd, slot);
> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Garbage collect the previous label */
> +	mutex_lock(&nd_mapping->lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list) {
> +		if (!label_ent->label)
> +			continue;
> +		if (rgl_uuid_equal(&label_ent->label->rg_label, &nd_set->uuid))
> +			reap_victim(nd_mapping, label_ent);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* update index */
> +	rc = nd_label_write_index(ndd, ndd->ns_next,
> +			nd_inc_seq(__le32_to_cpu(nsindex->seq)), 0);
> +
> +	if (rc == 0) {
> +		list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list)
> +			if (!label_ent->label) {
> +				label_ent->label = nd_label;
> +				nd_label = NULL;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		dev_WARN_ONCE(&nd_region->dev, nd_label,
> +				"failed to track label: %d\n",
> +				to_slot(ndd, nd_label));
> +		if (nd_label)
> +			rc = -ENXIO;
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&nd_mapping->lock);
> +
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
> +int nd_pmem_region_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region)

Same here. nd_pmem_region_label_update() is almost identical to the 
existing nd_pmem_namespace_label_update. 

Although I'm not familiar with drivers/nvdimm, it seems preferable to 
reuse and adapt the existing functions to reduce redundancy and simplify 
future maintenance, unless there are specific reasons for not doing so 
that I'm unaware of.

Thanks, 

Fabio

> +{
> +	int i, rc;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nd_region->ndr_mappings; i++) {
> +		struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping = &nd_region->mapping[i];
> +		struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping);
> +
> +		/* No need to update region label for non cxl format */
> +		if (!ndd->cxl)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* Init labels to include region label */
> +		rc = init_labels(nd_mapping, 1);
> +
> +		if (rc < 0)
> +			return rc;
> +
> +		rc = __pmem_region_label_update(nd_region, nd_mapping, i,
> +					NSLABEL_FLAG_UPDATING);
> +
> +		if (rc)
> +			return rc;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Clear the UPDATING flag per UEFI 2.7 expectations */
> +	for (i = 0; i < nd_region->ndr_mappings; i++) {
> +		struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping = &nd_region->mapping[i];
> +		struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping);
> +
> +		/* No need to update region label for non cxl format */
> +		if (!ndd->cxl)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		rc = __pmem_region_label_update(nd_region, nd_mapping, i, 0);
> +
> +		if (rc)
> +			return rc;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int __init nd_label_init(void)
>  {
>  	WARN_ON(guid_parse(NVDIMM_BTT_GUID, &nvdimm_btt_guid));
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.h b/drivers/nvdimm/label.h
> index 4883b3a1320f..0f428695017d 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.h
> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ struct nd_namespace_label {
>  struct nd_lsa_label {
>  	union {
>  		struct nd_namespace_label ns_label;
> +		struct cxl_region_label rg_label;
>  	};
>  };
>  
> @@ -233,4 +234,5 @@ struct nd_region;
>  struct nd_namespace_pmem;
>  int nd_pmem_namespace_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>  		struct nd_namespace_pmem *nspm, resource_size_t size);
> +int nd_pmem_region_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region);
>  #endif /* __LABEL_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> index 23b9def71012..6cccb4d2fc7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> @@ -232,6 +232,18 @@ static ssize_t __alt_name_store(struct device *dev, const char *buf,
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> +int nd_region_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region)
> +{
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	nvdimm_bus_lock(&nd_region->dev);
> +	rc = nd_pmem_region_label_update(nd_region);
> +	nvdimm_bus_unlock(&nd_region->dev);
> +
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nd_region_label_update);
> +
>  static int nd_namespace_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>  		struct device *dev)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h b/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h
> index 07d665f18bf6..2fdc92b29e8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h
> @@ -322,6 +322,26 @@ static inline void nsl_set_region_uuid(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  		export_uuid(ns_label->cxl.region_uuid, uuid);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool rgl_uuid_equal(struct cxl_region_label *rg_label,
> +				  const uuid_t *uuid)
> +{
> +	uuid_t tmp;
> +
> +	import_uuid(&tmp, rg_label->uuid);
> +	return uuid_equal(&tmp, uuid);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 rgl_get_checksum(struct cxl_region_label *rg_label)
> +{
> +	return __le64_to_cpu(rg_label->checksum);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void rgl_set_checksum(struct cxl_region_label *rg_label,
> +				    u64 checksum)
> +{
> +	rg_label->checksum = __cpu_to_le64(checksum);
> +}
> +
>  bool nsl_validate_type_guid(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  			    struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label, guid_t *guid);
>  enum nvdimm_claim_class nsl_get_claim_class(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
> diff --git a/include/linux/libnvdimm.h b/include/linux/libnvdimm.h
> index 0a55900842c8..b06bd45373f4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/libnvdimm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/libnvdimm.h
> @@ -115,6 +115,13 @@ struct nd_interleave_set {
>  	u64 altcookie;
>  
>  	guid_t type_guid;
> +
> +	/* v2.1 region label info */
> +	uuid_t uuid;
> +	int interleave_ways;
> +	int interleave_granularity;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int nr_targets;
>  };
>  
>  struct nd_mapping_desc {
> @@ -302,6 +309,7 @@ int nvdimm_has_flush(struct nd_region *nd_region);
>  int nvdimm_has_cache(struct nd_region *nd_region);
>  int nvdimm_in_overwrite(struct nvdimm *nvdimm);
>  bool is_nvdimm_sync(struct nd_region *nd_region);
> +int nd_region_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region);
>  
>  static inline int nvdimm_ctl(struct nvdimm *nvdimm, unsigned int cmd, void *buf,
>  		unsigned int buf_len, int *cmd_rc)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 
> 
> 





  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-17 22:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20250617124008epcas5p2e702f786645d44ceb1cdd980a914ce8e@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
     [not found] ` <20250617123944.78345-1-s.neeraj@samsung.com>
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 01/20] nvdimm/label: Introduce NDD_CXL_LABEL flag to set cxl label format Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-20 16:40     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26  9:48       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-02 18:02     ` Ira Weiny
2025-07-03  9:58       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-09 22:57     ` Dave Jiang
2025-07-18 12:13       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 02/20] nvdimm/label: Prep patch to accommodate cxl lsa 2.1 support Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23 10:53     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26  9:51       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-02 17:55     ` Ira Weiny
2025-07-03 10:04       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 03/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Add namespace label changes as per CXL LSA v2.1 Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 04/20] nvdimm/label: CXL labels skip the need for 'interleave-set cookie' Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 05/20] nvdimm/region_label: Add region label updation routine Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23  9:05     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26  9:54       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-17 22:53     ` Fabio M. De Francesco [this message]
2025-07-18 13:00       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 06/20] nvdimm/region_label: Add region label deletion routine Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23  9:09     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26  9:55       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 07/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Update namespace init_labels and its region_uuid Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23  9:11     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26  9:58       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 08/20] nvdimm/label: Include region label in slot validation Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23  9:13     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26 10:00       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 09/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Skip region label during ns label DPA reservation Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 10/20] nvdimm/region_label: Preserve cxl region information from region label Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 11/20] nvdimm/region_label: Export routine to fetch region information Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 12/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Skip region label during namespace creation Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23  9:17     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26 10:02       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 13/20] cxl/mem: Refactor cxl pmem region auto-assembling Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23  9:20     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26 10:03       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-10  0:38     ` Dave Jiang
2025-07-18 12:30       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-21 18:11         ` Dave Jiang
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 14/20] cxl/region: Add cxl pmem region creation routine for region persistency Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23  9:43     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26 10:23       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-10 15:59     ` Dave Jiang
2025-07-18 12:45       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 15/20] cxl: Add a routine to find cxl root decoder on cxl bus Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23  9:44     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26 10:38       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-26 19:19     ` Alison Schofield
2025-06-27  9:03       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-10 16:23     ` Dave Jiang
2025-07-18 12:48       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 16/20] cxl/mem: Preserve cxl root decoder during mem probe Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 17/20] cxl/pmem: Preserve region information into nd_set Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 18/20] cxl/pmem: Add support of cxl lsa 2.1 support in cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23  9:48     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26 10:41       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-10 17:18     ` Dave Jiang
2025-07-18 12:51       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-21 17:44         ` Dave Jiang
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 19/20] cxl/pmem_region: Prep patch to accommodate pmem_region attributes Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23  9:53     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26 10:45       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-17 12:39   ` [RFC PATCH 20/20] cxl/pmem_region: Add cxl region label updation and deletion device attributes Neeraj Kumar
2025-06-23  9:56     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-26 10:48       ` Neeraj Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2354653.gBsaNRSFpC@fdefranc-mobl3 \
    --to=fabio.m.de.francesco@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=alok.rathore@samsung.com \
    --cc=anisa.su@samsung.com \
    --cc=arun.george@samsung.com \
    --cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=krish.reddy@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=nifan.cxl@gmail.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=s.neeraj@samsung.com \
    --cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox