From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jim Harris <jim.harris@samsung.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Harris <jim.harris@samsung.com>,
"linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl: set root decoder granularity based on region params
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 11:08:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <651efba08a32e_ae7e72942b@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A9AA55AC-F925-4B7F-866B-7AB849CB6F36@ssi.samsung.com>
Jim Harris wrote:
[..]
> > If a BIOS tries to ship such a config in production that's when I expect
> > that policy needs to be revisited, but outside of being forced to
> > reconsider that stance the complexity reduction is the benefit.
> >
> > In the meantime maybe add an "effective granularity" concept for x1 root
> > decoders and x1 switches so the math can use that value?
>
> Ack. Use “effective_granularity” (EG) for the topology math and
> “interleave_granularity” (IG) for programming the decoders.
>
> For the x1 switches, is your intent here to set IG = 256 since the IG is
> really a don’t care from the decoder’s perspective? Or is there another
> reason we would need to track different IG v. EG for x1 switches?
Hmm, I see what you are saying. If the value is a don't care, might as well
just update interleave_granularity to make the math friendly. So "effective
granularity" is probably just a documentation update to the 'struct
cxl_decoder' kdoc so people are not surprised about why this may differ
from CFMWS value.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-05 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20231004230826uscas1p2f7957bf868a609211271e30ad8ff551f@uscas1p2.samsung.com>
2023-10-04 23:08 ` [PATCH] cxl: set root decoder granularity based on region params Jim Harris
2023-10-05 1:18 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-05 16:52 ` Jim Harris
2023-10-05 18:08 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2023-10-25 0:55 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-25 1:33 ` Jim Harris
2023-10-25 1:58 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-06 16:21 ` [PATCH] cxl/region: use region (not root decoder) granularity for calculations Jim Harris
2023-10-25 2:11 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-25 15:48 ` Jim Harris
2023-10-25 15:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Jim Harris
2023-10-26 0:11 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-26 17:11 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=651efba08a32e_ae7e72942b@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jim.harris@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox