Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Kwangjin Ko <kwangjin.ko@sk.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	<jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kernel_team@skhynix.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/1] cxl/core: Fix initialization of mbox_cmd.size_out in get event
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 07:53:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <660d6d64a50bd_7702a29466@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240402081404.1106-2-kwangjin.ko@sk.com>

Kwangjin Ko wrote:
> Since mbox_cmd.size_out is overwritten with the actual output size in
> the function below, it needs to be initialized every time.
> 
> cxl_internal_send_cmd -> __cxl_pci_mbox_send_cmd
> 
> Problem scenario:
> 
> 1) The size_out variable is initially set to the size of the mailbox.
> 2) Read an event.
>    - size_out is set to 160 bytes(header 32B + one event 128B).
>    - Two event are created while reading.
> 3) Read the new *two* events.
>    - size_out is still set to 160 bytes.
>    - Although the value of out_len is 288 bytes, only 160 bytes are
>      copied from the mailbox register to the local variable.
>    - record_count is set to 2.
>    - Accessing records[1] will result in reading incorrect data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kwangjin Ko <kwangjin.ko@sk.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> index 9adda4795eb7..a38531a055c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> @@ -958,13 +958,14 @@ static void cxl_mem_get_records_log(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
>  		.payload_in = &log_type,
>  		.size_in = sizeof(log_type),
>  		.payload_out = payload,
> -		.size_out = mds->payload_size,
>  		.min_out = struct_size(payload, records, 0),
>  	};
>  
>  	do {
>  		int rc, i;
>  
> +		mbox_cmd.size_out = mds->payload_size;
> +

Fix looks correct, but I am concerned it is a band-aid for a more
general problem. For example, if I am not mistaken, we have a similar
bug in cxl_mem_get_poison().

So perhaps a convention to always define @mbox_cmd immediately before
cxl_internal_send_cmd() like this:

diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
index 9adda4795eb7..5d44b5c095b7 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
@@ -946,24 +946,22 @@ static void cxl_mem_get_records_log(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
        struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = mds->cxlds.cxlmd;
        struct device *dev = mds->cxlds.dev;
        struct cxl_get_event_payload *payload;
-       struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd;
        u8 log_type = type;
        u16 nr_rec;
 
        mutex_lock(&mds->event.log_lock);
        payload = mds->event.buf;
 
-       mbox_cmd = (struct cxl_mbox_cmd) {
-               .opcode = CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_EVENT_RECORD,
-               .payload_in = &log_type,
-               .size_in = sizeof(log_type),
-               .payload_out = payload,
-               .size_out = mds->payload_size,
-               .min_out = struct_size(payload, records, 0),
-       };
-
        do {
                int rc, i;
+               struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd = (struct cxl_mbox_cmd){
+                       .opcode = CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_EVENT_RECORD,
+                       .payload_in = &log_type,
+                       .size_in = sizeof(log_type),
+                       .payload_out = payload,
+                       .size_out = mds->payload_size,
+                       .min_out = struct_size(payload, records, 0),
+               };
 
                rc = cxl_internal_send_cmd(mds, &mbox_cmd);
                if (rc) {
@@ -1296,7 +1294,6 @@ int cxl_mem_get_poison(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 offset, u64 len,
        struct cxl_memdev_state *mds = to_cxl_memdev_state(cxlmd->cxlds);
        struct cxl_mbox_poison_out *po;
        struct cxl_mbox_poison_in pi;
-       struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd;
        int nr_records = 0;
        int rc;
 
@@ -1308,16 +1305,16 @@ int cxl_mem_get_poison(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 offset, u64 len,
        pi.offset = cpu_to_le64(offset);
        pi.length = cpu_to_le64(len / CXL_POISON_LEN_MULT);
 
-       mbox_cmd = (struct cxl_mbox_cmd) {
-               .opcode = CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_POISON,
-               .size_in = sizeof(pi),
-               .payload_in = &pi,
-               .size_out = mds->payload_size,
-               .payload_out = po,
-               .min_out = struct_size(po, record, 0),
-       };
-
        do {
+               struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd = (struct cxl_mbox_cmd){
+                       .opcode = CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_POISON,
+                       .size_in = sizeof(pi),
+                       .payload_in = &pi,
+                       .size_out = mds->payload_size,
+                       .payload_out = po,
+                       .min_out = struct_size(po, record, 0),
+               };
+
                rc = cxl_internal_send_cmd(mds, &mbox_cmd);
                if (rc)
                        break;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-03 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-02  8:14 [PATCH v2 0/1] cxl/core: Fix initialization of mbox_cmd.size_out in get event Kwangjin Ko
2024-04-02  8:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Kwangjin Ko
2024-04-02 14:38   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-02 16:25   ` Ira Weiny
2024-04-03 14:53   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2024-04-04 13:30     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-04 17:35       ` Dan Williams
2024-04-04 20:20         ` Ira Weiny
2024-04-05 16:04   ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-05 16:40     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-05 17:37       ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-05 17:45         ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=660d6d64a50bd_7702a29466@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
    --cc=kwangjin.ko@sk.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox