From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
<vishal.l.verma@intel.com>, <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <lukas@wunner.de>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] PCI: Add check for CXL Secondary Bus Reset
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 12:47:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66329c3fe094e_10c21294b6@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240429223610.1341811-3-dave.jiang@intel.com>
Dave Jiang wrote:
> Per CXL spec r3.1 8.1.5.2, Secondary Bus Reset (SBR) is masked unless the
> "Unmask SBR" bit is set. Add a check to the PCI secondary bus reset
> path to fail the CXL SBR request if the "Unmask SBR" bit is clear in
> the CXL Port Control Extensions register by returning -ENOTTY.
>
> Otherwise when the "Unmask SBR" bit is set to 0 (default), the bus_reset
> would appear to have executed successfully. However the operation is
> actually masked. The intention is to inform the user that SBR for the CXL
> device is masked and will not go through.
>
> If the "Unmask SBR" bit is set to 1, then the bus reset will execute
> successfully.
>
> Add the locking of the upstream bridge in pci_reset_function() to ensure
> the locking order of locking the bridge then locking the device. The
> bridge configuration needs to be consistent for a CXL device. This should
> not impact PCI devices.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20240220203956.GA1502351@bhelgaas/
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> v5:
> - Add locking of upstream bridge.
[..]
> @@ -5245,11 +5290,20 @@ void pci_init_reset_methods(struct pci_dev *dev)
> */
> int pci_reset_function(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> + struct pci_dev *bridge;
> int rc;
>
> if (!pci_reset_supported(dev))
> return -ENOTTY;
>
> + bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> + /*
> + * If there's no upstream bridge, then no locking is needed since there is no
> + * upstream bridge configuration to hold consistent.
> + */
> + if (bridge)
> + pci_dev_lock(bridge);
> +
This change deserves to be broken out and merged separately because it
is fixing a long standing locking gap for missing pci_cfg_access_lock()
while manipulating bridge reset registers and configuration during
pci_reset_bus_function().
Yes, the CXL reset type adds SBR mask management, but that does not change
the fact that PCIe SBR is inconsistently locked.
This builds for me and highlights the expectation:
diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
index 6449056b57dd..36f10c7f9ef5 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/access.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
@@ -275,6 +275,8 @@ void pci_cfg_access_lock(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
might_sleep();
+ lock_map_acquire(&dev->cfg_access_lock);
+
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pci_lock);
if (dev->block_cfg_access)
pci_wait_cfg(dev);
@@ -329,6 +331,8 @@ void pci_cfg_access_unlock(struct pci_dev *dev)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags);
wake_up_all(&pci_cfg_wait);
+
+ lock_map_release(&dev->cfg_access_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_cfg_access_unlock);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index e5f243dd4288..63086d97eb90 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -4879,6 +4879,7 @@ void __weak pcibios_reset_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev)
*/
int pci_bridge_secondary_bus_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
+ lock_map_assert_held(&dev->cfg_access_lock);
pcibios_reset_secondary_bus(dev);
return pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(dev, "bus reset");
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index d89b67541d02..2f178cd6e723 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -2544,6 +2544,9 @@ void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dma_mask;
dev->dev.dma_parms = &dev->dma_parms;
dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = 0xffffffffull;
+ lockdep_register_key(&dev->cfg_access_key);
+ lockdep_init_map(&dev->cfg_access_lock, dev_name(&dev->dev),
+ &dev->cfg_access_key, 0);
dma_set_max_seg_size(&dev->dev, 65536);
dma_set_seg_boundary(&dev->dev, 0xffffffff);
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 08b0d1d9d78b..5e51b0de4c4b 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -297,6 +297,9 @@ extern void lock_unpin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct pin_cookie);
.wait_type_inner = _wait_type, \
.lock_type = LD_LOCK_WAIT_OVERRIDE, }
+#define lock_map_assert_held(l) \
+ lockdep_assert(lock_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD)
+
#else /* !CONFIG_LOCKDEP */
static inline void lockdep_init_task(struct task_struct *task)
@@ -388,6 +391,8 @@ extern int lockdep_is_held(const void *);
#define DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(_name, _wait_type) \
struct lockdep_map __maybe_unused _name = {}
+#define lock_map_assert_held(l) do { (void)(l); } while (0)
+
#endif /* !LOCKDEP */
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-01 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-29 22:35 [PATCH v5 0/4] PCI: Add Secondary Bus Reset (SBR) support for CXL Dave Jiang
2024-04-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] PCI/cxl: Move PCI CXL vendor Id to a common location from CXL subsystem Dave Jiang
2024-05-01 15:37 ` PJ Waskiewicz
2024-05-01 16:04 ` Dave Jiang
2024-05-01 16:09 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] PCI: Add check for CXL Secondary Bus Reset Dave Jiang
2024-05-01 19:47 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2024-04-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] PCI: Create new reset method to force SBR for CXL Dave Jiang
2024-05-02 2:51 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-29 22:35 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] cxl: Add post reset warning if reset results in loss of previously committed HDM decoders Dave Jiang
2024-05-02 2:55 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66329c3fe094e_10c21294b6@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox