From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Zhi Wang <zhiw@nvidia.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <alison.schofield@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<dave.jiang@intel.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
<jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
<vishal.l.verma@intel.com>, <acurrid@nvidia.com>,
<cjia@nvidia.com>, <smitra@nvidia.com>, <ankita@nvidia.com>,
<aniketa@nvidia.com>, <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
<targupta@nvidia.com>, <zhiw@nvidia.com>, <zhiwang@kernel.org>,
Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cxl: factor out cxl_await_range_active() and cxl_media_ready()
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 12:01:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <677825e03d092_bbd3d294ca@iweiny-mobl.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241213103906.378950-1-zhiw@nvidia.com>
Zhi Wang wrote:
> Before accessing the CXL device memory after reset/power-on, the driver
> needs to ensure the device memory media is ready.
>
> However, not every CXL device implements the CXL memory device register
> groups. E.g. a CXL type-2 device. Thus calling cxl_await_media_ready()
> on these devcie will lead to a kernel panic. This problem was found when
> testing the emulated CXL type-2 device without a CXL memory device
> register.
>
[snip]
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> index 4be35dc22202..6fbbaae4a79c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> @@ -846,8 +846,7 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> if (rc)
> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
>
> - rc = cxl_await_media_ready(cxlds);
> - if (rc == 0)
> + if (!cxl_await_range_active(cxlds) && !cxl_media_ready(cxlds))
FWIW this logic is awkward for me. To me this says 'range not active' and
'media not ready' sets the media_ready flag to true.
Why not make cxl_await_range_active() and cxl_media_ready() return bool?
if (cxl_await_range_active(cxlds) && cxl_media_ready(cxlds))
...
?
Ira
> cxlds->media_ready = true;
> else
> dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Media not active (%d)\n", rc);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-03 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-13 10:39 [PATCH v2] cxl: factor out cxl_await_range_active() and cxl_media_ready() Zhi Wang
2024-12-15 13:29 ` Li Ming
2024-12-24 16:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-12-28 11:44 ` Zhi Wang
2025-01-03 18:01 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=677825e03d092_bbd3d294ca@iweiny-mobl.notmuch \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=smitra@nvidia.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhiwang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox