From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Ben Widawsky" <bwidawsk@kernel.org>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
"Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
"Gregory Price" <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>,
"Mike Maslenkin" <mike.maslenkin@gmail.com>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] hw/mem/cxl_type3: Add CXL RAS Error Injection Support.
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 10:40:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfertpjc.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45b86050-0f0b-d222-c32f-9d6f23246574@linaro.org> ("Philippe Mathieu-Daudé"'s message of "Fri, 24 Feb 2023 20:02:59 +0100")
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> writes:
> On 23/2/23 15:27, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 08:37:46 +0100
>> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Whenever you use a poisoned macro in a conditional, all the code
>>> generated for this .json file (we call it a "QAPI schema module")
>>> becomes target-dependent. The QAPI code generator itself is blissfully
>>> unaware of this.
>>>
>>> Since target-dependent code needs to be compiled differently, the build
>>> process needs to be know which modules are target-dependent. We do this
>>> in one of the stupidest ways that could possibly work: a module is
>>> target-dependent if its name ends with "-target". There are just two
>>> right now: qapi/machine-target.json and qapi/misc-target.json.
>>>
>>> The logic resides in qapi/meson.build. Look for
>>>
>>> if module.endswith('-target')
>>
>> Thanks for all the pointers.
>>
>>> Questions?
>>>
>> Is it sensible to make the cxl stuff all target dependent and do the following?
>> I like that we can get rid of the stubs if we do this but I'm sure there are
>> disadvantages. Only alternative I can currently see is continue to have
>> stubs and not make the qmp commands conditional on them doing anything useful.
>
> I still don't understand what is the target-dependent part of CXL.
>
> IIUC CXL depends on PCIe which isn't target dependent.
As far as I can tell, the target-dependent part of CXL is the macro
CONFIG_CXL :)
Consider a device model implemented in perfectly target-independent
code, to be linked only into some qemu-system-TARGET. How do we do
that?
We put a 'config FOO' section in the appropriate Kconfig, and select it
from the target's Kconfig for the targets that want it. We add device
model sources to Meson source set softmmu_ss when CONFIG_FOO.
This puts CONFIG_FOO=y into the TARGET-softmmu-config-devices.mak, and
#define CONFIG_FOO 1 into TARGET-softmmu-config-devices.h. It also puts
#pragma GCC poison CONFIG_FOO into config-poison.h.
Note the two CONFIG_FOO have subtly different meaning:
* The make variable means "there is an enabled target that has FOO
enabled". It gets propagated to Meson.
* The C macro means "the current target has FOO enabled". It therefore
must not be used in target-independent code. That's why we poison it
in config-poison.h.
Note that the device model code has no use for C macro CONFIG_FOO. It
remains target-independent as it should.
Now consider how to have the QAPI schema provide something for FOO.
If we make it a QAPI schema module of its own, we can arrange for it to
be linked only into the qemu-system-TARGET that have the device model,
just like the device model code. We haven't tried this for individual
devices, only for whole subsystems like PCI.
If we don't make it a module of its own, we have two choices:
* We use 'if': 'CONFIG_FOO'. This is actually the C macro. The module
becomes target-dependent. We compile the code generated for the
module separately for each target.
* We make it unconditional. The module can remain target-independent.
The code generated for FOO's QAPI schema is linked unconditionally,
even when the target doesn't need it. Any references to handwritten
FOO code need to be satisfied with stubs.
I dislike both. Existing usage seems to prefer "unconditional schema".
Sticking to that is okay.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-27 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-21 15:21 [PATCH v5 0/8] hw/cxl: RAS error emulation and injection Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-21 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] hw/pci/aer: Implement PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK register Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-21 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] hw/pci/aer: Add missing routing for AER errors Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-21 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] hw/pci-bridge/cxl_root_port: Wire up AER Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-21 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] hw/pci-bridge/cxl_root_port: Wire up MSI Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-21 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] hw/mem/cxl-type3: Add AER extended capability Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-21 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] hw/cxl: Fix endian issues in CXL RAS capability defaults / masks Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-21 22:06 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-21 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] hw/pci/aer: Make PCIE AER error injection facility available for other emulation to use Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-21 22:08 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-21 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] hw/mem/cxl_type3: Add CXL RAS Error Injection Support Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-21 15:48 ` Dave Jiang
2023-02-21 22:15 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-22 14:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-22 15:32 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-22 16:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-22 18:16 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-23 6:58 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-23 7:37 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-23 14:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-24 17:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-24 19:02 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-27 9:40 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2023-02-22 18:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-10-27 4:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-10-31 17:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-11-02 6:47 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfertpjc.fsf@pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gourry.memverge@gmail.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mike.maslenkin@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox