From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
To: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ndctl PATCH v2 2/2] daxctl: Remove unimplemented create-device options
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 14:43:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlpEaV9F6fXKv2Vm@aschofie-mobl2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240531062959.881772-2-lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 02:29:59PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
> RECONFIG_OPTIONS and ZONE_OPTIONS are not implemented for create-device
> and they will be ignored by create-device. Remove them so that the usage
> message is identical to the manual.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
The net effect of this is a correction to the usage message.
I think that can fit in the commit msg with something like this:
daxctl: Remove unused options in create-device usage message
I'm not familiar with this style of patch 2 being a reply to patch 1.
Is there a reason this is not presented as a patchset?
Thanks,
Alison
> ---
> V2: make the usage match the manual because the usage is wrong.
> ---
> daxctl/device.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/daxctl/device.c b/daxctl/device.c
> index ffabd6cf5707..781dc4007f83 100644
> --- a/daxctl/device.c
> +++ b/daxctl/device.c
> @@ -98,8 +98,6 @@ OPT_BOOLEAN('\0', "no-movable", ¶m.no_movable, \
> static const struct option create_options[] = {
> BASE_OPTIONS(),
> CREATE_OPTIONS(),
> - RECONFIG_OPTIONS(),
> - ZONE_OPTIONS(),
> OPT_END(),
> };
>
> --
> 2.29.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-31 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-31 6:29 [ndctl PATCH v2 1/2] daxctl: Fix create-device parameters parsing Li Zhijian
2024-05-31 6:29 ` [ndctl PATCH v2 2/2] daxctl: Remove unimplemented create-device options Li Zhijian
2024-05-31 20:03 ` Verma, Vishal L
2024-05-31 20:37 ` Dave Jiang
2024-05-31 21:43 ` Alison Schofield [this message]
2024-06-03 1:26 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2024-05-31 20:02 ` [ndctl PATCH v2 1/2] daxctl: Fix create-device parameters parsing Verma, Vishal L
2024-05-31 20:36 ` Dave Jiang
2024-05-31 21:32 ` Alison Schofield
2024-06-03 1:12 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZlpEaV9F6fXKv2Vm@aschofie-mobl2 \
--to=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox