From: "Li, Ming" <ming4.li@intel.com>
To: Terry Bowman <Terry.Bowman@amd.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<rrichter@amd.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] PCI/AER: Enable RCEC to report internal error for CXL root port
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:53:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0b85a37-ead0-4954-b7e0-dd09cbd9ab09@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91ddd182-cc71-480f-a1b2-e7c31b29a549@amd.com>
On 4/16/2024 10:46 PM, Terry Bowman wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> On 4/16/24 02:27, Li, Ming wrote:
>> On 3/26/2024 3:42 AM, Terry Bowman wrote:
>>> Hi Li,
>>>
>>> I added comments below.
>>>
>>> On 3/13/24 03:35, Li Ming wrote:
>>>> Per CXl r3.1 section 12.2.2, CXL.cachemem protocol erros detected by CXL
>>>> root port could be logged in RCEC AER Extended Capability as
>>>> PCI_ERR_UNC_INTN or PCI_ERR_COR_INTERNAL. Unmask these errors for that
>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Li Ming <ming4.li@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>>>> index 42a3bd35a3e1..364c74e47273 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>>>> @@ -985,7 +985,7 @@ static bool cxl_error_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>> {
>>>> struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
>>>>
>>>> - return (pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer);
>>>> + return (pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer) && host->is_cxl;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static bool is_internal_error(struct aer_err_info *info)
>>>> @@ -1041,8 +1041,13 @@ static int handles_cxl_error_iter(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
>>>> {
>>>> bool *handles_cxl = data;
>>>>
>>>> - if (!*handles_cxl)
>>>> - *handles_cxl = is_cxl_mem_dev(dev) && cxl_error_is_native(dev);
>>>> + if (!*handles_cxl && cxl_error_is_native(dev)) {
>>>> + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END &&
>>>> + dev->rcec && is_cxl_mem_dev(dev))
>>>> + *handles_cxl = true;
>>>> + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
>>>> + *handles_cxl = true;
>>>> + }
>>> I understand a root port can be found under an RCEC. It's possible. But, does the downstream
>>> root port forward AER to the upstream RCEC? My understanding is AER is handled and processed
>>> at the first root port/RCEC upstream from the device/RCH/USP/DSP.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Terry
>>>
>>
>> CXL r3.1 section 12.2.2 mentions this:
>>
>> "If the CXL.cachemem protocol errors detected by a CXL root port are logged as
>> CIEs or UIEs in an RCEC’s AER Extended Capability, it is recommended that the System
>> Firmware populate an RDPAS record (see Section 9.18.1.5) to establish the association
>> between the RCEC and the root port."
>>
>> I think it means that CXL root port is possible to forward its AER to RCEC.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ming
>>
>
> Thanks for pointing to spec details.
>
> In testing here, we used root port as agent to consume root port CXL protocol errors.
> The logic to handle the root port errors requires little to no AER driver changes.
> This results in a root port consuming VH protocol errors and RCEC consuming RCD
> protocol errors. The RCEC and root port both use the PCIe port bus driver's AER service
> driver in separate instances for RCEC-RCD and root-port-VH.
>
> The driver support is much simpler if RCEC does not handle VH protocol errors. Is there
> a reason to forward root port VH mode protocol errors to an RCEC rather than consume
> in the root port's AER driver and forward to CXL error handler?
>
> Regards,
> Terry
I agree that is simpler if only root port handle VH protocol errors, but I think that software has no chance to choose if VH protocol errors reported to RCEC or root port, it depends on platform implementation. So I think we should support both cases.
Thanks
Ming
>
>>>>
>>>> /* Non-zero terminates iteration */
>>>> return *handles_cxl;
>>>> @@ -1054,13 +1059,18 @@ static bool handles_cxl_errors(struct pci_dev *rcec)
>>>>
>>>> if (pci_pcie_type(rcec) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC &&
>>>> pcie_aer_is_native(rcec))
>>>> - pcie_walk_rcec(rcec, handles_cxl_error_iter, &handles_cxl);
>>>> + pcie_walk_rcec_all(rcec, handles_cxl_error_iter, &handles_cxl);
>>>>
>>>> return handles_cxl;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static void cxl_rch_enable_rcec(struct pci_dev *rcec)
>>>> +static void cxl_enable_rcec(struct pci_dev *rcec)
>>>> {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Enable RCEC's internal error report for two cases:
>>>> + * 1. RCiEP detected CXL.cachemem protocol errors
>>>> + * 2. CXL root port detected CXL.cachemem protocol errors.
>>>> + */
>>>> if (!handles_cxl_errors(rcec))
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1069,7 +1079,7 @@ static void cxl_rch_enable_rcec(struct pci_dev *rcec)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> #else
>>>> -static inline void cxl_rch_enable_rcec(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
>>>> +static inline void cxl_enable_rcec(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
>>>> static inline void cxl_rch_handle_error(struct pci_dev *dev,
>>>> struct aer_err_info *info) { }
>>>> #endif
>>>> @@ -1494,7 +1504,7 @@ static int aer_probe(struct pcie_device *dev)
>>>> return status;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - cxl_rch_enable_rcec(port);
>>>> + cxl_enable_rcec(port);
>>>> aer_enable_rootport(rpc);
>>>> pci_info(port, "enabled with IRQ %d\n", dev->irq);
>>>> return 0;
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-18 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-13 8:35 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Add support for root port RAS error handling Li Ming
2024-03-13 8:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] PCI/RCEC: Introduce pcie_walk_rcec_all() Li Ming
2024-03-25 20:15 ` Terry Bowman
2024-04-16 4:39 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-22 14:34 ` Terry Bowman
2024-04-22 23:03 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-23 2:33 ` Li, Ming
2024-04-16 7:23 ` Li, Ming
2024-03-13 8:35 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] PCI/CXL: A new attribute to indicate CXL-capable host bridge Li Ming
2024-03-13 8:35 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] PCI/AER: Enable RCEC to report internal error for CXL root port Li Ming
2024-03-25 19:42 ` Terry Bowman
2024-04-16 7:27 ` Li, Ming
2024-04-16 14:46 ` Terry Bowman
2024-04-18 5:53 ` Li, Ming [this message]
2024-04-18 14:57 ` Dan Williams
2024-04-22 2:06 ` Li, Ming
2024-04-22 23:01 ` Dan Williams
2024-03-13 8:36 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] PCI/AER: Extend RCH RAS error handling to support VH topology case Li Ming
2024-03-15 2:30 ` Dan Williams
2024-03-15 3:43 ` Li, Ming
2024-03-15 4:05 ` Dan Williams
2024-03-15 5:08 ` Li, Ming
2024-03-25 19:14 ` Terry Bowman
2024-03-13 8:36 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] cxl: Use __free() for cxl_pci/mem_find_port() to drop put_device() Li Ming
2024-03-15 2:24 ` Dan Williams
2024-03-15 4:05 ` Li, Ming
2024-03-13 8:36 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] cxl/pci: Support to handle root port RAS errors captured by RCEC Li Ming
2024-03-15 1:45 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Add support for root port RAS error handling Dan Williams
2024-03-15 8:40 ` Li, Ming
2024-03-15 18:21 ` Dan Williams
2024-03-20 12:48 ` Li, Ming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0b85a37-ead0-4954-b7e0-dd09cbd9ab09@intel.com \
--to=ming4.li@intel.com \
--cc=Terry.Bowman@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox