Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] dt-bindings: arm: altera: add Agilex5 SOCDK eMMC board variant

["Kathpalia, Tanmay" <tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com>]

On 8/11/2026 12:40 AM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Low] Device Tree compilation will fail due to the undefined macro `COMBOPHY_RESET` in the `emmc` node.
> --
>
> --- Patch [3]: [PATCH v4 3/8] dt-bindings: arm: altera: add Agilex5 SOCDK eMMC board variant ---
> commit a686e27903fc966d624926fbeae5d10fa6638ad7
> Author: Tanmay Kathpalia <tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com>
>
> dt-bindings: arm: altera: add Agilex5 SOCDK eMMC board variant
>
> Document the Agilex5 SoCDK with the eMMC daughter card, which uses the
> shared HPS SD/eMMC host for onboard eMMC instead of an SD slot.
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml
>> index 0b418d9d60dbd..ce3a8c1679e57 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml
>> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ properties:
>>                 - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk
>>                 - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-013b
>>                 - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-debug
>> +              - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-emmc
> [Severity: Low]
> Does this new variant introduce a regression when compiling the emmc node in
> socfpga_agilex5.dtsi?
>
> It appears that Device Tree compilation will fail due to the undefined macro
> COMBOPHY_RESET in the emmc node.
>
> In arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5.dtsi:
>
> 		emmc: mmc@10808000 {
> 			compatible = "altr,agilex5-sd6hc", "cdns,sd6hc";
> 			...
> 			resets = <&rst SDMMC_RESET>, <&rst COMBOPHY_RESET>,
> 				 <&rst SDMMC_OCP_RESET>;
>
> The resets property uses the COMBOPHY_RESET macro which is not defined in
> dt-bindings/reset/altr,rst-mgr-s10.h or anywhere else in the tree. Because
> the C preprocessor leaves undefined macros unexpanded, executing the dtbs make
> target will result in a syntax error when the compiler expects integer cell
> references.
>
> Should this macro be added to the reset bindings, or is a different reset
> intended here?

This comment applies to patch 2/8 (arm64: dts: agilex5: add SD/eMMC host
controller), which adds the emmc node.

COMBOPHY_RESET is already defined. It was added by:
commit ab45ecfab540 ("dt-bindings: reset: altr: add COMBOPHY_RESET for 
Agilex5")
which is in mainline via the reset tree:
   #define COMBOPHY_RESET        38
in include/dt-bindings/reset/altr,rst-mgr-s10.h.

That commit is not yet in mmc/next, which is why DT builds against mmc/next
alone can fail. The dependency is called out in the cover letter and in the
patch 2/8.


>>                 - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-modular
>>                 - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-nand
>>             - const: intel,socfpga-agilex5