Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tanmay Kathpalia" <tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] dt-bindings: arm: altera: add Agilex5 SOCDK eMMC board variant
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 19:10:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810191040.535A31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810190025.25045-4-tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Device Tree compilation will fail due to the undefined macro `COMBOPHY_RESET` in the `emmc` node.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v4 3/8] dt-bindings: arm: altera: add Agilex5 SOCDK eMMC board variant ---
commit a686e27903fc966d624926fbeae5d10fa6638ad7
Author: Tanmay Kathpalia <tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com>

dt-bindings: arm: altera: add Agilex5 SOCDK eMMC board variant

Document the Agilex5 SoCDK with the eMMC daughter card, which uses the
shared HPS SD/eMMC host for onboard eMMC instead of an SD slot.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml
> index 0b418d9d60dbd..ce3a8c1679e57 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera.yaml
> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ properties:
>                - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk
>                - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-013b
>                - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-debug
> +              - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-emmc
[Severity: Low]
Does this new variant introduce a regression when compiling the emmc node in
socfpga_agilex5.dtsi?

It appears that Device Tree compilation will fail due to the undefined macro
COMBOPHY_RESET in the emmc node.

In arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5.dtsi:

		emmc: mmc@10808000 {
			compatible = "altr,agilex5-sd6hc", "cdns,sd6hc";
			...
			resets = <&rst SDMMC_RESET>, <&rst COMBOPHY_RESET>,
				 <&rst SDMMC_OCP_RESET>;

The resets property uses the COMBOPHY_RESET macro which is not defined in
dt-bindings/reset/altr,rst-mgr-s10.h or anywhere else in the tree. Because
the C preprocessor leaves undefined macros unexpanded, executing the dtbs make
target will result in a syntax error when the compiler expects integer cell
references.

Should this macro be added to the reset bindings, or is a different reset
intended here?

>                - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-modular
>                - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk-nand
>            - const: intel,socfpga-agilex5

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260810190025.25045-1-tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10 19:00 [PATCH v4 0/8] mmc: sdhci-cadence: add SD6HC support and Agilex5 enablement Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-08-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: mmc: add Cadence SD6HC binding Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-08-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] arm64: dts: agilex5: add SD/eMMC host controller Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-08-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] dt-bindings: arm: altera: add Agilex5 SOCDK eMMC board variant Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-08-10 19:10   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-10 19:18     ` Kathpalia, Tanmay
2026-08-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] arm64: dts: agilex5: add SOCDK eMMC daughter board Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-08-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] mmc: sdhci-cadence: rename SD4HC symbols for SD6HC groundwork Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-08-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] mmc: sdhci-cadence: refactor driver structure for V6 controller support Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-08-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] mmc: sdhci-cadence: add Cadence SD6HC support Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-08-10 19:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:00 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] mmc: sdhci-cadence: add Altera Agilex5 " Tanmay Kathpalia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260810191040.535A31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox