Re: [PATCH RFC] riscv: dts: spacemit: Add DMA translation buses for K1

[Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn>]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 6/17/25 14:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/06/2025 07:21, Vivian Wang wrote:
>> The SpacemiT K1 has various static translations of DMA accesses. Add
>> these as simple-bus nodes. Devices actually using these translation will
>> be added in later patches.
>>
>> The bus names are assigned according to consensus with SpacemiT [1].
>
> Read the feedback there:
>
> "So, as you are submitting the first node(s) under network_bus: bus@5, you
> should have this added into your patchset, instead of sending out with
> none."
As mentioned in the patch extra message, this is an RFC meant for
achieving consensus on what the bus nodes should look like, not an
actual patch meant to be taken. I was hoping I was clear on that, but I
guess that paragraph was buried too deep. Well...
> Plus simple bus within MMIO node needs unit address. IOW, don't mix MMIO
> with non-MMIO. I also suspect this does not pass checks, so the tools
> can do our review...

This DT passes "make dtbs_check" fine, with only unrelated warnings on
sec_uart1 that was already there before:

  DTC [C] arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dtb
.../arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dtb: serial@f0612000
(spacemit,k1-uart): 'clock-names' is a required property
        from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/8250.yaml#
  DTC [C] arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-milkv-jupiter.dtb
.../arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-milkv-jupiter.dtb: serial@f0612000
(spacemit,k1-uart): 'clock-names' is a required property
        from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/8250.yaml#

To be honest, I don't understand what "within MMIO node" means here.
Should the buses be taken out of /soc and added as its siblings?

Thanks,
Vivian "dramforever" Wang

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof