From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: correct QDU1000 reg entries
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 07:23:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <170204182670.1155646.3136881067040734815.robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231107080436.16747-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 09:04:36 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Qualcomm QDU1000 DTSI comes with one LLCC0 base address as pointed by
> dtbs_check:
>
> qdu1000-idp.dtb: system-cache-controller@19200000: reg-names:2: 'llcc2_base' was expected
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>
> ---
>
> Recent LLCC patches were not tested on QDU1000 thus the LLCC is there
> broken. This patch at least tries to bring some sense according to
> DTSI, but I have no clue what is here correct: driver, DTS or bindings.
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Applied, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-07 8:04 [PATCH] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: correct QDU1000 reg entries Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-07 8:55 ` Mukesh Ojha
2023-11-08 12:26 ` Conor Dooley
2023-11-09 8:40 ` Mukesh Ojha
2024-06-11 10:15 ` Mukesh Ojha
2023-12-08 13:23 ` Rob Herring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=170204182670.1155646.3136881067040734815.robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox