From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org>
To: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: rcar-gen4: Add missing PM ops
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 04:22:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1758591c-4583-4db1-a9bc-32430bbb6a37@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ain27ypszl767h3fygurivurojxctyjy2yprada6lgjef5c623@23nn7tsrecb6>
On 9/9/26 4:17 AM, Koichiro Den wrote:
Hello Den-san,
>>> The s2idle test with pm_test=platform now passes in EP mode on S4 Spider even
>>> with CONFIG_PCIE_DW_HOST=y. Thanks! Feel free to use the tag for it if it helps.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
>> Thank you for your test. I would like to ask -- is the EP side of PCIe link
>> behaving correctly during suspend/resume cycle on your S4 setup ? Does the
>> EP require any special handling during suspend/resume ?
>
> To be clear, what I confirmed was the following:
>
> - The panic I observed with v1 no longer occurs with this newer revision.
> - I could create a vNTB EPF after running the test.
> - With vNTB/ntb_netdev already connected before the test. ping resumed normally
> afterwards.
>
> Note: I used the suspend test from the commit message on the EP:
> echo s2idle > /sys/power/mem_sleep && \
> echo platform > /sys/power/pm_test && \
> echo mem > /sys/power/state
>
> Based on these, I believe this patch introduces no regression in EP mode on S4.
> Any pre-existing EP suspend/resume issues could be addressed separately.
Understood.
Thank you for your help !
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 4:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 16:35 [PATCH v3] PCI: rcar-gen4: Add missing PM ops Marek Vasut
2026-09-07 16:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 1:05 ` Koichiro Den
2026-09-08 16:29 ` Marek Vasut
2026-09-09 2:17 ` Koichiro Den
2026-09-09 2:22 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1758591c-4583-4db1-a9bc-32430bbb6a37@mailbox.org \
--to=marek.vasut@mailbox.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox