From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: linusw@kernel.org
Cc: woojung.huh@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
andrew@lunn.ch, olteanv@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
marex@denx.de, horms@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
nb@tipi-net.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v14 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip: Add KSZ8995XA
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 23:36:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178951540672.22033.5965330247410897822@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914-ks8995-to-ksz8-v14-1-3d72692b3c97@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 1
- [Low] Concern (validated as resolved within the series): the new
compatible `microchip,ksz8995xa` added to…
--
dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip: Add KSZ8995XA
Adds the compatible string microchip,ksz8995xa to the Microchip KSZ
series DSA switch binding, described as having the same properties as
the KS8995XA. No Link: tags were present in the commit header.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml
> index 8d4a3a9a33fcc..4ed13870ed3ac 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
> - microchip,ksz8864 # 4-port version of KSZ8895 family switch
> - microchip,ksz8873
> - microchip,ksz8895 # 5-port version of KSZ8895 family switch
> + - microchip,ksz8995xa
[Severity: Low]
One thing that came up while reviewing this in isolation: at this commit
there is no consumer for microchip,ksz8995xa, so a device tree using it
would not match anything in ksz_dt_ids[] in
drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_spi.c and ksz_spi_probe() would bail out.
Checking the rest of the series resolves this, so this looks fine as is:
drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_spi.c:ksz_dt_ids[]
{
.compatible = "microchip,ksz8995xa",
.data = &ksz_switch_chips[KSZ8995XA]
},
drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_spi.c:ksz_spi_ids[]
{ "ksz8995xa" },
along with the ksz8995xa_regs[] register map and the KSZ8995XA entry in
ksz_switch_chips[] in drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c, all added by
"net: dsa: microchip: Support Microchip KSZ8995XA / KS8995XA". The
alternative placement in micrel,ks8995.yaml also does not apply since
drivers/net/dsa/ks8995.c is removed by "net: dsa: ks8995: Delete surplus
driver" in the same series.
Should the placement of the compatible with respect to the existing
allOf/if blocks be double checked too? The microchip,ksz8863/ksz8873
3-port block and the microchip,ksz8463 straps block both look inapplicable
to a 5-port KSZ8995XA, so as far as I can tell no existing conditional
needed the new string added, but confirmation would be useful.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260914-ks8995-to-ksz8-v14-0-3d72692b3c97%40kernel.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 20:35 [PATCH net-next v14 0/4] net: dsa: microchip: Add support for KSZ8995XA/KS8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-09-14 20:35 ` [PATCH net-next v14 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip: Add KSZ8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-09-15 23:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-14 20:35 ` [PATCH net-next v14 2/4] net: dsa: tag_ks8995: Add the KS8995 tag handling Linus Walleij
2026-09-15 20:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 23:21 ` Linus Walleij
2026-09-14 20:35 ` [PATCH net-next v14 3/4] net: dsa: microchip: Support Microchip KSZ8995XA / KS8995XA Linus Walleij
2026-09-15 20:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-15 23:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14 20:35 ` [PATCH net-next v14 4/4] net: dsa: ks8995: Delete surplus driver Linus Walleij
2026-09-15 23:36 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178951540672.22033.5965330247410897822@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox