From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
rjw@sisk.pl, mark.rutland@arm.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
s.nawrocki@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.abraham@linaro.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
t.stanislaws@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk,
rob.herring@calxeda.com, ben-linux@fluff.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
rob@landley.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:42:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1823897.8rOixkM4PW@amdc1227> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131021121605.11944.74007@quantum>
Hi Kukjin, Mike,
On Monday 21 of October 2013 05:16:05 Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-10-20 13:51:42)
> > On 10/20/13 01:03, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Hi Mike, Kukjin, Rafael,
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 24 of September 2013 14:50:06 Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:
> > >> This patch series is the new s5pv210 clock implementation
> > >> (using common clk framework).
> > >>
> > >> This implementation is compatible with device tree definition and board
> > >> files.
> > >>
> > >> This patch series is based on linux-next and has been tested on goni and
> > >> aquila
> > >> boards using board file.
> > >>
> > >> Since v4:
> > >> Corrected mux flags for finpll.
> > >>
> > >> Since v3:
> > >>
> > >> Replace s5pv210_clk_register_finpll, by creating mux finpll
> > >> with xusbxti and xxti as parrents.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Mateusz Krawczuk (3):
> > >> clk: samsung: Add clock driver for s5pc110/s5pv210
> > >> Cpufreq: s5pv210 cpufreq fixes for CCF
> > >> ARM: s5pv210: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework
> > >>
> > >> .../bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt | 75 +++
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 9 +
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile | 4 +-
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.c | 17 +
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.h | 10 +
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c | 2 +-
> > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c | 2 +-
> > >> arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > >> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 3 +
> > >> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c | 673
> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> > >> | 6 +-
> > >> include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h | 224 +++++++
> > >> 12 files changed, 1019 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >> create mode 100644
> > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt
> > >> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c
> > >> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h
> > >
> > > I believe this series is reasonable to be applied. Could we agree on
> > > the tree it would go through and get all tne required acks?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Tomasz
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> > Mike, how do you think the common clk stuff for s5pv210?
>
> Clock code looks good to me. Which tree do you want to take it through?
Seems like we just missed another kernel release. It's a bit sad that it's
happening so often for Samsung patches...
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-29 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-24 12:50 [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] clk: samsung: Add clock driver for s5pc110/s5pv210 Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 13:58 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
[not found] ` <52419A6E.9020203-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-24 14:26 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-09-24 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] Cpufreq: s5pv210 cpufreq fixes for CCF Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: s5pv210: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework Tomasz Figa
2013-10-19 16:03 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-10-20 20:51 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-10-21 12:16 ` Mike Turquette
2013-10-29 11:42 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-10-29 15:46 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-10-29 17:46 ` Mike Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1823897.8rOixkM4PW@amdc1227 \
--to=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=t.stanislaws@samsung.com \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox