Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: palmas: support IRQ inversion at the board level

[Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

> >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >>
> >> Some boards or SoCs have an inverter between the PMIC IRQ output pin and
> >> the IRQ controller input signal.
> >>
> >> The IRQ specifier in DT is meant to represent the IRQ flags at the input
> >> to the IRQ controller.
> >>
> >> The Palmas HW's IRQ output has configurable polarity. The driver
> >> currently selects the output polarity by querying the input polarity at
> >> the IRQ controller. This works fine if the IRQ signal is routed directly
> >> from the PMIC to the IRQ controller with no intervening logic. However,
> >> if the signal is inverted between the two, this automatic polarity
> >> selection gets the wrong answer.
> >>
> >> Add an additional optional DT and platform data parameter which indicates
> >> that such an inversion occurs. If this option is enabled, the Palmas
> >> driver will configure its IRQ output to the opposite polarity of the IRQ
> >> controller's input.
> >>
> >> An alternative would have been to add a new non-optional DT parameter to
> >> indicate the exact desired output polarity. However, this would have been
> >> an incompatible change to the DT binding.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >> ---
> >> If this patch could be applied to its own branch (w/ signed tag) in the
> >> MFD tree, that would great; then I can pull patch 1/2 into the Tegra tree
> >> so that I can apply patch 2/2 to the Tegra tree. Thanks.
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/palmas.txt | 6 ++++++
> >>  drivers/mfd/palmas.c                             | 4 ++++
> >>  include/linux/mfd/palmas.h                       | 1 +
> >>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > 
> > For the core changes:
> >   Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Thanks. Since you ack'd this and are an MFD maintainer, was that an
> indication that I should take this patch through the Tegra tree?

No, it was an indication that we still require more Acks. :)

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog