Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] dt-bindings: add device tree binding for X-Powers AXP803 PMIC

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] dt-bindings: add device tree binding for X-Powers AXP803 PMIC

[Icenowy Zheng]

2017年4月12日 上午12:29于 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>写道：
>
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Sat, 08 Apr 2017, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> AXP803 is a PMIC produced by Shenzhen X-Powers, with either I2C or RSB
> > >>> bus.
> > >>>
> > >>> Add a compatible for it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
> > >>> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> Changes in v2:
> > >>> - Place AXP803 before AXP806/809.
> > >>> - Added Chen-Yu's ACK.
> > >>>
> > >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt | 5 +++--
> > >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> For my own reference:
> > >>  Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > >
> > >
> > > Excuse me... Who will apply this patch?
>
> Excuse you?  Are you trying to be polite, or rude?
>
> I'm guessing due to the lagging '...', that it's the latter?

Oh sorry, I mean the former...

>
> > > I think this patch should be applied by you as it's in bindings/mfd
> > > directory, however, if I'm wrong, please point out ;-)
> >
> > We need the DT maintainers to ack it first. :)
>
> We don't really need the DT Maintainers to get involved here.
>
> What I do need is either clear direction as to how this
> patch-set should be applied, or an indication of which patches are
> dependant on others and which are orthogonal and can be applied
> independently.

This patch is independent, although the regulator binding patch
depends on it.

The real driver patches will need the binding patches to be merged
first.

And the dt patches depend on also the binding patches.

>
> -- 
> Lee Jones
> Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] dt-bindings: add device tree binding for X-Powers AXP803 PMIC

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 12 Apr 2017, Icenowy Zheng wrote:

> 
> 2017年4月12日 上午12:29于 Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>写道：
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy-h8G6r0blFSE@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Sat, 08 Apr 2017, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> AXP803 is a PMIC produced by Shenzhen X-Powers, with either I2C or RSB
> > > >>> bus.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Add a compatible for it.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy-h8G6r0blFSE@public.gmane.org>
> > > >>> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
> > > >>> ---
> > > >>> Changes in v2:
> > > >>> - Place AXP803 before AXP806/809.
> > > >>> - Added Chen-Yu's ACK.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt | 5 +++--
> > > >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> For my own reference:
> > > >>  Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Excuse me... Who will apply this patch?
> >
> > Excuse you?  Are you trying to be polite, or rude?
> >
> > I'm guessing due to the lagging '...', that it's the latter?
> 
> Oh sorry, I mean the former...

Okay, no problem then.

> > > > I think this patch should be applied by you as it's in bindings/mfd
> > > > directory, however, if I'm wrong, please point out ;-)
> > >
> > > We need the DT maintainers to ack it first. :)
> >
> > We don't really need the DT Maintainers to get involved here.
> >
> > What I do need is either clear direction as to how this
> > patch-set should be applied, or an indication of which patches are
> > dependant on others and which are orthogonal and can be applied
> > independently.
> 
> This patch is independent, although the regulator binding patch
> depends on it.
> 
> The real driver patches will need the binding patches to be merged
> first.

Right, so Acking and not applying wasn't such a strange practice
after all then. =;-)

> And the dt patches depend on also the binding patches.

The issue I have now is; because your email client replies as a new
mail i.e. non-threaded, now I have no reference to the patch-set.

Since time is a valuable resource, I will not be dredging though my
inbox looking for all your replies.

Please fix your client before replying to another mail.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html