Re: [RESEND PATCH 00/10] arm64: dts: intel: socfpga: minor cleanups

Re: [RESEND PATCH 00/10] arm64: dts: intel: socfpga: minor cleanups

[Alessandrelli, Daniele]

On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 17:22 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi Arnd and Olof,
> 
> This is just a resend of previous patch. Since I did not get replies
> from Intel maintainers, I assume this could go via soc tree directly.

I think the to/cc list is missing Dinh, the socfpga maintainer:
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> 

I already acked the only patch I could review, i.e.:
dt-bindings: arm: intel,keembay: limit the dtschema to root node

Regards,
Daniele

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
> Krzysztof Kozlowski (10):
>   dt-bindings: arm: intel,keembay: limit the dtschema to root node
>   arm64: dts: intel: socfpga: override clocks by label
>   arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: move clocks out of soc node
>   arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: move timer out of soc node
>   arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: remove default status=okay
>   arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: move usbphy out of soc node
>   arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: use defined for GIC interrupts
>   arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: align node names with dtschema
>   arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex_socdk: align LED node names with
>     dtschema
>   arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex_socdk_nand: align LED node names
>     with dtschema
> 
>  .../bindings/arm/intel,keembay.yaml           |   2 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi | 222 ++++++++++----
> ----
>  .../boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_socdk.dts   |  18 +-
>  .../dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_socdk_nand.dts   |  18 +-
>  .../boot/dts/intel/socfpga_n5x_socdk.dts      |  12 +-
>  5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
> 

Re: [RESEND PATCH 00/10] arm64: dts: intel: socfpga: minor cleanups

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 05:22:18PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi Arnd and Olof,
> 
> This is just a resend of previous patch. Since I did not get replies
> from Intel maintainers, I assume this could go via soc tree directly.

Actually it is my bad because I think I skipped Dinh Nguyen. Let me
resend it one more time, hopefully to proper address.

Best regards,
Krzysztof