public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@amd.com>
Cc: tudor.ambarus@linaro.org, pratyush@kernel.org,
	miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, git@amd.com, michael@walle.cc,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amitrkcian2002@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: jedec, spi-nor: Add DT property to avoid setting SRWD bit in status register
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 20:13:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230615-bright-divided-2eb72872d7cc@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230615111649.36344-2-amit.kumar-mahapatra@amd.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2518 bytes --]

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 04:46:48PM +0530, Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote:
> If the WP signal of the flash device is not connected and the software sets
> the status register write disable (SRWD) bit in the status register then
> thestatus register permanently becomes read-only. To avoid this added a new
> boolean DT property "broken-wp". If WP signal is not connected, then this
> property should be set in the DT to avoid setting the SRWD during status
> register write operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@amd.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml      | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> index 89959e5c47ba..a509d34f14b2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml
> @@ -70,6 +70,19 @@ properties:
>        be used on such systems, to denote the absence of a reliable reset
>        mechanism.
>  
> +  broken-wp:
> +    type: boolean
> +    description:
> +      The SRWD bit in status register, combined with the WP signal provides

Should the first use of SRWD be spelt out as you did in your commit
message?

> +      The SRWD bit in status register, combined with the WP signal provides
                                                                     ^
nit: missing a comma here I think.

> +      hardware data protection for the device. When the SRWD bit is set to 1,
> +      and the WP signal is driven LOW, the status register nonvolatile bits
> +      become read-only and the WRITE STATUS REGISTER operation will not execute.
> +      The only way to exit this hardware-protected mode is to drive WP HIGH. But
> +      if the WP signal of the flash device is not connected then status register
> +      permanently becomes read-only as the SRWD bit cannot be reset. This boolean
> +      flag can be used on such systems in which WP signal is not connected, to

nit: s/such//

Otherwise, seems reasonable to me & the detail in the description is
nice.
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.

> +      avoid setting the SRWD bit while writing the status register.
> +
>    reset-gpios:
>      description:
>        A GPIO line connected to the RESET (active low) signal of the device.
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-15 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-15 11:16 [PATCH 0/2] mtd: spi-nor: Avoid setting SRWD bit in SR Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2023-06-15 11:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: jedec, spi-nor: Add DT property to avoid setting SRWD bit in status register Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2023-06-15 12:08   ` Michael Walle
2023-06-15 19:13   ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-06-15 11:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: Avoid setting SRWD bit in SR if WP signal not connected Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2023-06-15 12:18   ` Michael Walle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230615-bright-divided-2eb72872d7cc@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=amit.kumar-mahapatra@amd.com \
    --cc=amitrkcian2002@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=git@amd.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox