From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: conor@kernel.org, "Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
"Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>,
"Andy Chiu" <andybnac@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add some validation for vector, vector crypto and fp stuff
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:05:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250205-cobbler-unpadded-5580c1f5d946@spud> (raw)
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Yo,
This series is partly leveraging Clement's work adding a validate
callback in the extension detection code so that things like checking
for whether a vector crypto extension is usable can be done like:
has_extension(<vector crypto>)
rather than
has_vector() && has_extension(<vector crypto>)
which Eric pointed out was a poor design some months ago.
The rest of this is adding some requirements to the bindings that
prevent combinations of extensions disallowed by the ISA.
There's a bunch of over-long lines in here, but I thought that the
over-long lines were clearer than breaking them up.
Cheers,
Conor.
v3:
- rebase on v6.14-rc1
- split vector crypto validation patch into vector validation and vector
crypto validation
- fix zve64x requiring extension list to match Eric's PR
v2:
- Fix an inverted clause Clément pointed out
- Add Zvbb validation, that I had missed accidentally
- Drop the todo about checking the number of validation rounds,
I tried in w/ qemu's max cpu and things looked right
CC: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
CC: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
CC: "Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>
CC: Andy Chiu <andybnac@gmail.com>
CC: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Conor Dooley (6):
RISC-V: add vector extension validation checks
RISC-V: add vector crypto extension validation checks
RISC-V: add f & d extension validation checks
dt-bindings: riscv: d requires f
dt-bindings: riscv: add vector sub-extension dependencies
dt-bindings: riscv: document vector crypto requirements
.../devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 85 +++++++++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 3 +
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 133 +++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 16:05 Conor Dooley [this message]
2025-02-05 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] RISC-V: add vector extension validation checks Conor Dooley
2025-02-06 10:08 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-06 11:19 ` Conor Dooley
2025-02-11 10:16 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-11 14:43 ` Conor Dooley
2025-02-05 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] RISC-V: add vector crypto " Conor Dooley
2025-02-06 10:20 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-06 11:24 ` Conor Dooley
2025-02-06 12:56 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-06 20:32 ` Eric Biggers
2025-02-07 0:02 ` Conor Dooley
2025-02-11 8:45 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-11 12:34 ` Conor Dooley
2025-02-11 13:33 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-05 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] RISC-V: add f & d " Conor Dooley
2025-02-06 10:08 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-11 10:22 ` Clément Léger
2025-02-11 12:06 ` Conor Dooley
2025-02-05 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] dt-bindings: riscv: d requires f Conor Dooley
2025-02-05 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] dt-bindings: riscv: add vector sub-extension dependencies Conor Dooley
2025-02-05 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: riscv: document vector crypto requirements Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250205-cobbler-unpadded-5580c1f5d946@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=andybnac@gmail.com \
--cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox