Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] add Voyager board support

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2165 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 05:16:54PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 08:06:07PM +0800, Ben Zong-You Xie wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 05:00:06PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > [EXTERNAL MAIL]
> > 
> > > Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 17:00:06 +0100
> > > From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
> > > To: Ben Zong-You Xie <ben717@andestech.com>
> > > Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
> > >  alex@ghiti.fr, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
> > >  tglx@linutronix.de, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
> > >  prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
> > >  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> > >  tim609@andestech.com
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] add Voyager board support
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 02:07:39PM +0800, Ben Zong-You Xie wrote:
> > > > The Voyager is a 9.6” x 9.6” Micro ATX form factor development board
> > > > including Andes QiLai SoC. This patch series adds minimal device tree
> > > > files for the QiLai SoC and the Voyager board [1].
> > > > 
> > > > Now only support basic uart drivers to boot up into a basic console. Other
> > > > features will be added later.
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://www.andestech.com/en/products-solutions/andeshape-platforms/qilai-chip/
> > > 
> > > Ball is in your court now, after rc1 make a tree and get it in
> > > linux-next, and then send a pr to soc@kernel.org with this new content.
> > > Perhaps the defconfig should go separately, I can take that one if you
> > > want.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Conor.
> > 
> > Hi Conor,
> > 
> > Thanks for your guidance on these patches. I will send a PR to
> > soc@kernel.org as you suggested.
> > 
> > For the defconfig patch, I'm happy for you to handle it. Just let me
> > know if there's anything specific you'd like me to include.
> 
> Okay, I picked it up on the basis that you'll send this all to Arnd for
> 6.17

Sorry, I think that was really poorly worded. I picked it up on the
basis that you're going to send the other patches in the series to Arnd
for 6.17.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]