public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@subdimension.ro>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	Nuno S?? <nuno.sa@analog.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] iio: accel: bma220: migrate to regmap API
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 13:22:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250913132241.0047e93b@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMQ0JlbqIuMwDBpQ@sunspire>

On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 17:54:30 +0300
Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@subdimension.ro> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 07:12:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:57:13 +0300
> > Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@subdimension.ro> wrote:
> >   
> > > Switch to regmap API.
> > >   
> > There are a few things in here that seem unrelated to the regmap change
> > and should be in separate patches where we can review and discuss them more easily.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Jonathan
> >   
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bma220_core.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bma220_core.c  
> > >>  static irqreturn_t bma220_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)  
> > >  {  
> [..]
> > >  	iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(indio_dev, &data->scan, sizeof(data->scan),
> > > -				    pf->timestamp);  
> > 
> > Why the move to grabbing timestamps in the thread rather than the top half?
> > 
> > I don't necessarily mind that change but doesn't feel appropriate to have
> > it in the same patch as the regmap change.  
> 
> one of my unit tests [1] fails when using the original code (all timestamps are
> 0 when reading the IIO buffer with iio_generic_buffer)
> 
> would be easier to just split modification into new patch instead of debugging
> the old code :)
> 
> [1]: https://codeberg.org/subDIMENSION/lkm_sandbox/src/branch/main/bosch_bma220/unit-tests/permanent_latch/test.sh

Ah. So this is the problem we've had various attempts to fix of not all triggers
have a top half.  Definitely wants to be a separate patch with an explanation of
why you are making the change.  Hopefully someone will get time to finish of
fixing this up more generically but I don't mind papering over it in a particular
driver in the meantime because the generic fix is rather complex.

Jonathan

> 
> best regards,
> peter


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-13 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-10  7:57 [PATCH v2 00/14] iio: accel: bma220 improvements Petre Rodan
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] dt-bindings: iio: accel: bosch,bma220 cleanup typo Petre Rodan
2025-09-11  7:31   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] dt-bindings: iio: accel: bosch,bma220 setup SPI clock mode Petre Rodan
2025-09-10 17:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11  7:31   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] dt-bindings: iio: accel: bosch,bma220 change irq type Petre Rodan
2025-09-11  7:33   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-11  9:53     ` Petre Rodan
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] iio: accel: bma220: split original driver Petre Rodan
2025-09-10 17:56   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 19:01   ` David Lechner
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] iio: accel: bma220: add open firmware table Petre Rodan
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] iio: accel: bma220: add get regulator check Petre Rodan
2025-09-10 17:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-10 18:51     ` Petre Rodan
2025-09-10 20:28       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] iio: accel: bma220: reset registers during init stage Petre Rodan
2025-09-10 18:01   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11  7:35   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-11 12:36     ` Petre Rodan
2025-09-11 13:07       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-11 13:52         ` Petre Rodan
2025-09-11 13:59           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-11 13:44       ` David Lechner
2025-09-12 14:24         ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 19:14   ` David Lechner
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] iio: accel: bma220: migrate to regmap API Petre Rodan
2025-09-10 18:12   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-12 14:54     ` Petre Rodan
2025-09-13 12:22       ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] iio: accel: bma220: add i2c module Petre Rodan
2025-09-11 19:23   ` David Lechner
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] iio: accel: bma220: add i2c watchdog feature Petre Rodan
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] iio: accel: bma220: add interrupt trigger Petre Rodan
2025-09-10 18:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] iio: accel: bma220: add LPF cut-off frequency mapping Petre Rodan
2025-09-10 18:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] iio: accel: bma220: add debugfs reg access Petre Rodan
2025-09-10  7:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] iio: accel: bma220: add maintainer Petre Rodan
2025-09-10 18:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] iio: accel: bma220 improvements Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250913132241.0047e93b@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=petre.rodan@subdimension.ro \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox