From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay"
<devnull+rodrigo.alencar.analog.com@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 02/10] iio: core: support 64-bit register through debugfs
Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 22:20:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508222031.19E23C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508-ad9910-iio-driver-v4-2-d26bfd20ee3d@analog.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Uninitialized stack memory read when file offset is non-zero
- [Medium] Missing newline character in debugfs read output
- [Medium] Silent truncation of 64-bit values for 32-bit registers
- [Low] Format specifier type mismatch in sscanf
--
commit 2208ef2b9ad567bd166f4ac44a53f42c899c021b
Author: Rodrigo Alencar <rodrigo.alencar@analog.com>
iio: core: support 64-bit register through debugfs
This patch adds a debugfs_reg64_access function pointer to iio_info to
support 64-bit registers. It also updates the read and write debugfs file
operations to use the 64-bit variant when available, falling back to 32-bit.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> index bd6f4f9f45330..cb4e2ade25c0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -403,7 +412,7 @@ static ssize_t iio_debugfs_read_reg(struct file *file, char __user *userbuf,
>
> iio_dev_opaque->read_buf_len = snprintf(iio_dev_opaque->read_buf,
> sizeof(iio_dev_opaque->read_buf),
> - "0x%X\n", val);
> + "0x%llX", val64);
Does this inadvertently drop the newline character?
[ ... ]
> @@ -429,7 +439,7 @@ static ssize_t iio_debugfs_write_reg(struct file *file,
>
> buf[ret] = '\0';
Could buf be read uninitialized here if *ppos > 0?
fs/libfs.c:simple_write_to_buffer() writes user data to buf + *ppos and
returns the number of bytes written:
res = copy_from_user(to + pos, from, count);
if (res == count)
return -EFAULT;
count -= res;
*ppos = pos + count;
return count;
If *ppos > 0, the first *ppos bytes of buf remain uninitialized. The
subsequent sscanf() reads starting from buf[0], parsing up to count bytes
of uninitialized kernel stack memory.
>
> - ret = sscanf(buf, "%i %i", ®, &val);
> + ret = sscanf(buf, "%i %lli", ®, &val64);
Can this trigger compiler warnings? val64 is of type u64, but %lli is the
specifier for a signed long long pointer.
>
> switch (ret) {
> case 1:
> @@ -437,8 +447,12 @@ static ssize_t iio_debugfs_write_reg(struct file *file,
> break;
> case 2:
> iio_dev_opaque->cached_reg_addr = reg;
> - ret = indio_dev->info->debugfs_reg_access(indio_dev, reg,
> - val, NULL);
> + if (indio_dev->info->debugfs_reg64_access)
> + ret = indio_dev->info->debugfs_reg64_access(indio_dev, reg,
> + val64, NULL);
> + else
> + ret = indio_dev->info->debugfs_reg_access(indio_dev, reg,
> + val64, NULL);
Does this silently truncate 64-bit values for 32-bit registers?
If a user provides a 64-bit value but the driver only implements the 32-bit
debugfs_reg_access callback, val64 is passed directly as the unsigned int
argument. This discards the upper 32 bits without returning an error.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260508-ad9910-iio-driver-v4-0-d26bfd20ee3d@analog.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 17:00 [PATCH RFC v4 00/10] AD9910 Direct Digital Synthesizer Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-08 17:00 ` [PATCH RFC v4 01/10] dt-bindings: iio: frequency: add ad9910 Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-08 22:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 17:00 ` [PATCH RFC v4 02/10] iio: core: support 64-bit register through debugfs Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-08 22:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-10 10:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-08 17:00 ` [PATCH RFC v4 03/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: initial driver implementation Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-08 22:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 17:00 ` [PATCH RFC v4 04/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: add basic parallel port support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-08 23:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 17:00 ` [PATCH RFC v4 05/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: add digital ramp generator support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-08 23:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 17:00 ` [PATCH RFC v4 06/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: add RAM mode support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-09 0:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 17:00 ` [PATCH RFC v4 07/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: add output shift keying support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-09 1:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 17:00 ` [PATCH RFC v4 08/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: show channel priority in debugfs Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-09 1:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 17:00 ` [PATCH RFC v4 09/10] Documentation: ABI: testing: add docs for ad9910 sysfs entries Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-09 1:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 17:00 ` [PATCH RFC v4 10/10] docs: iio: add documentation for ad9910 driver Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-05-09 1:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-09 23:42 ` David Lechner
2026-05-10 9:30 ` Rodrigo Alencar
2026-05-09 22:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 00/10] AD9910 Direct Digital Synthesizer David Lechner
2026-05-10 8:50 ` Rodrigo Alencar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260508222031.19E23C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devnull+rodrigo.alencar.analog.com@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox