Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Josua Mayer" <josua@solid-run.com>
Cc: krzk+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: renesas: add support for solidrun rzv2l som and hb-iiot evb
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 02:43:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512024305.DF50CC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511-rzg2-sr-boards-v2-3-82aebbd27891@solid-run.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The composite DTB targets for the RZ/V2L board are missing the '-iiot' identifier, leading to inconsistent naming.
- [Medium] The shared device tree overlays are not added to the install targets for the R9A07G054 architecture.
- [Low] The `-dtbs` composite variables are populated using `+=` instead of `:=`.
--

commit 1346fdf98939d24bedd9085cb7ddffee29247fcf
Author: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>

arm64: dts: renesas: add support for solidrun rzv2l som and hb-iiot evb

This commit adds device tree support for the SolidRun RZ/V2L SoM on the
HummingBoard IIoT platform. It utilizes shared code and device tree overlays
from the existing RZ/G2L series.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> index 37cfefe66a308..cdf59f3240e27 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> @@ -188,6 +188,15 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G044) += r9a07g044l2-smarc-cru-csi-ov5645.dtbo
>  r9a07g044l2-smarc-cru-csi-ov5645-dtbs := r9a07g044l2-smarc.dtb r9a07g044l2-smarc-cru-csi-ov5645.dtbo
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G044) += r9a07g044l2-smarc-cru-csi-ov5645.dtb
>  
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G054) += r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-iiot.dtb

Should the shared device tree overlays be explicitly added to the install
targets for CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G054?

Currently, overlays like rzg2l-sr-som-emmc.dtbo and
rzg2l-hummingboard-iiot-microsd.dtbo are built as intermediate dependencies,
but Kbuild's make dtbs_install only installs artifacts present in dtb-y.
Without being added to dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G054), will these standalone
.dtbo files be missing from the installation directory?

> +r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-emmc-dtbs += r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-iiot.dtb rzg2l-sr-som-emmc.dtbo
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G054) += r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-emmc.dtb

Are these composite DTB targets missing the -iiot identifier?

The base board is named r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-iiot.dts, but the targets
omit -iiot (for example, r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-emmc.dtb). The equivalent
RZ/G2L targets correctly include it, such as
r9a07g044l2-hummingboard-iiot-emmc.dtb.

Could this naming discrepancy cause issues for deployment scripts
expecting the -iiot substring to locate the RZ/V2L DTBs?

Also, this isn't a bug, but is it intentional to use += instead of := for
these composite variables?

In Kbuild, := is generally the standard convention for defining multi-DTB
targets, as seen in the surrounding Makefile entries.

> +r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-microsd-dtbs += r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-iiot.dtb rzg2l-hummingboard-iiot-microsd.dtbo
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G054) += r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-microsd.dtb
> +r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-rs485-a-dtbs += r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-iiot.dtb rzg2l-hummingboard-iiot-rs485-a.dtbo
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G054) += r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-rs485-a.dtb
> +r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-rs485-b-dtbs += r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-iiot.dtb rzg2l-hummingboard-iiot-rs485-b.dtbo
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G054) += r9a07g054l2-hummingboard-rs485-b.dtb

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260511-rzg2-sr-boards-v2-0-82aebbd27891@solid-run.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-11 10:37 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: dts: renesas: Add various SolidRun RZ/G2 based boards Josua Mayer
2026-05-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: " Josua Mayer
2026-05-11 16:28   ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: renesas: add support for solidrun rzg2l som and hb-iiot evb Josua Mayer
2026-05-12  2:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 12:50     ` Josua Mayer
2026-05-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: renesas: add support for solidrun rzv2l " Josua Mayer
2026-05-12  2:43   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-12 10:40     ` Josua Mayer
2026-05-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: renesas: add support for solidrun rzg2lc " Josua Mayer
2026-05-12  3:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 10:56     ` Josua Mayer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260512024305.DF50CC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=josua@solid-run.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox