From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Josua Mayer" <josua@solid-run.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, robh@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: renesas: add support for solidrun rzg2lc som and hb-iiot evb
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 03:18:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512031832.6C52BC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511-rzg2-sr-boards-v2-4-82aebbd27891@solid-run.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Missing unit address for reserved-memory node with a `reg` property.
- [Low] Inconsistent use of `+=` instead of `:=` for Kbuild composite DTB definitions.
- [Low] Redundant addition of shared `.dtbo` overlay targets to the Makefile variable.
--
commit 8d9d2cbc7a77754ee19950ca31a17d0916b4b627
Author: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
arm64: dts: renesas: add support for solidrun rzg2lc som and hb-iiot evb
Add support for the SolidRun RZ/G2LC SoM on Hummingboard IIoT, which
features various peripherals including Ethernet, eMMC, and WiFi.
The RZ/G2LC SoM is pin-compatible with the G2L SoM with a slightly
reduced feature set.
Link: https://www.solid-run.com/embedded-industrial-iot/renesas-rz-family/rz-g2lc-som/
Link: https://www.solid-run.com/embedded-industrial-iot/renesas-rz-family/hummingboard-rz-series-sbcs/hummingboard-rz-g2l-iot-sbc/
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> @@ -164,6 +164,17 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G043) += r9a07g043u11-smarc-du-adv7513.dtb
> r9a07g043u11-smarc-pmod-dtbs := r9a07g043u11-smarc.dtb r9a07g043-smarc-pmod.dtbo
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G043) += r9a07g043u11-smarc-pmod.dtb
>
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G044) += r9a07g044c2-hummingboard-iiot.dtb
> +r9a07g044c2-hummingboard-iiot-emmc-dtbs += r9a07g044c2-hummingboard-iiot.dtb rzg2l-sr-som-emmc.dtbo
This isn't a bug, but should this use := instead of += for consistency with
standard Kbuild practice and other composite DTB definitions in this Makefile?
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G044) += r9a07g044c2-hummingboard-iiot-emmc.dtb
> +r9a07g044c2-hummingboard-iiot-microsd-dtbs += r9a07g044c2-hummingboard-iiot.dtb rzg2l-hummingboard-iiot-microsd.dtbo
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G044) += r9a07g044c2-hummingboard-iiot-microsd.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G044) += rzg2l-hummingboard-iiot-rs485-a.dtbo
This isn't a bug, but since rzg2l-hummingboard-iiot-rs485-a.dtbo and
rzg2l-hummingboard-iiot-rs485-b.dtbo are already appended to
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G044) for the shared r9a07g044l2 SoC variant, is it
redundant to include them here?
> +r9a07g044c2-hummingboard-iiot-rs485-a-dtbs += r9a07g044c2-hummingboard-iiot.dtb rzg2l-hummingboard-iiot-rs485-a.dtbo
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G044) += r9a07g044c2-hummingboard-iiot-rs485-a.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R9A07G044) += rzg2l-hummingboard-iiot-rs485-b.dtbo
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/rzg2lc-sr-som.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/rzg2lc-sr-som.dtsi
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/rzg2lc-sr-som.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,373 @@
[ ... ]
> + reserved-memory {
> + ranges;
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + mmp_reserved: linux,multimedia {
> + compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> + reg = <0x0 0x68000000 0x0 0x8000000>;
> + reusable;
> + };
Does this node need a unit address matching the first address of the reg block
(e.g., linux,multimedia@68000000) to prevent a unit_address_vs_reg DTC
compiler warning?
> +
> + global_cma: linux,cma@58000000 {
> + compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> + reg = <0x0 0x58000000 0x0 0x10000000>;
> + reusable;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260511-rzg2-sr-boards-v2-0-82aebbd27891@solid-run.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 10:37 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: dts: renesas: Add various SolidRun RZ/G2 based boards Josua Mayer
2026-05-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: " Josua Mayer
2026-05-11 16:28 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: renesas: add support for solidrun rzg2l som and hb-iiot evb Josua Mayer
2026-05-12 2:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 12:50 ` Josua Mayer
2026-05-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: renesas: add support for solidrun rzv2l " Josua Mayer
2026-05-12 2:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 10:40 ` Josua Mayer
2026-05-11 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: renesas: add support for solidrun rzg2lc " Josua Mayer
2026-05-12 3:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-12 10:56 ` Josua Mayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260512031832.6C52BC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josua@solid-run.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox