From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yixun Lan" <dlan@kernel.org>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: spacemit: drop unnecessary power supply from PCIe
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 00:54:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514005435.484B5C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513-k1-pcie-fix-supply-v1-1-4eecbdd44ebe@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Removing `vpcie3v3-supply` from the PCIe controller node breaks power sequencing because the `spacemit,k1-pcie` driver expects it on the controller node.
--
commit ab7558e23a3bb4900f7961804151870f4c1f99fe
Author: Yixun Lan <dlan@kernel.org>
riscv: dts: spacemit: drop unnecessary power supply from PCIe
This commit removes the vpcie3v3-supply property from the PCIe controller
nodes in the Banana Pi F3 and Milk-V Jupiter device trees. The commit message
states that the supply belongs to the child port node rather than the Root
Complex, aligning with the dt-binding documentation.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251113214540.2623070-4-elder@riscstar.com/
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts
> index e20daa50a152f..c70081856606f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts
> @@ -316,7 +316,6 @@ &pcie1_port {
> };
>
> &pcie1 {
> - vpcie3v3-supply = <&pcie_vcc_3v3>;
Will removing the vpcie3v3-supply property from the controller node break
power sequencing?
Looking at drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-spacemit-k1.c, the host driver
calls devm_regulator_get_enable(dev, "vpcie3v3") during k1_pcie_probe().
Without this property on the controller node, won't the driver fall back
to a dummy regulator?
Since the spacemit-k1-pcie driver does not currently integrate with the PCI
power control framework (by calling pci_pwrctrl_create_devices()), does any
driver in the kernel actually control the power supply for the child port node?
While this issue might be masked on the Banana Pi F3 and Milk-V Jupiter
boards because their vpcie3v3 regulators are defined as regulator-always-on,
does this change break dynamic power management for the PCIe slots?
Should the host driver be updated to adopt the pci_pwrctrl framework before
dropping this property from the device tree?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260513-k1-pcie-fix-supply-v1-1-4eecbdd44ebe@kernel.org?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 2:14 [PATCH] riscv: dts: spacemit: drop unnecessary power supply from PCIe Yixun Lan
2026-05-13 8:24 ` Anand Moon
2026-05-14 0:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260514005435.484B5C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlan@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox