From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Piyush Patle" <piyushpatle228@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/11] iio: adc: hx711: pass iio_chan_spec to hx711_reset_read
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 22:41:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518224111.C635CC2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518220228.63322-11-piyushpatle228@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Triggering the buffer with the soft timestamp channel enabled causes a bogus physical hardware read, leading to severe latency spikes and sample rate degradation.
--
commit ca51c74e19ecc54987d0605c8007f8dcdc337783
Author: Piyush Patle <piyushpatle228@gmail.com>
iio: adc: hx711: pass iio_chan_spec to hx711_reset_read
Change hx711_reset_read() to accept the channel descriptor directly and
update its callers accordingly.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/hx711.c b/drivers/iio/adc/hx711.c
> index d7987c70beec2..8ec4dee1f451e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/hx711.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/hx711.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -391,8 +406,8 @@ static irqreturn_t hx711_trigger(int irq, void *p)
> memset(&hx711_data->buffer, 0, sizeof(hx711_data->buffer));
>
> iio_for_each_active_channel(indio_dev, i) {
> - hx711_data->buffer.channel[j] = hx711_reset_read(hx711_data,
> - indio_dev->channels[i].channel);
> + hx711_data->buffer.channel[j] =
> + hx711_reset_read(hx711_data, &indio_dev->channels[i]);
> j++;
> }
Does this loop cause a bogus physical hardware read when the soft timestamp
channel is enabled?
Because iio_for_each_active_channel() iterates over all bits set in the
active_scan_mask, it includes the soft timestamp channel, passing it
directly into hx711_reset_read().
For the timestamp channel, chan->channel is -1. When passed down to
hx711_set_gain_for_channel(), any non-zero channel is treated as the
secondary physical channel (Channel B), forcing a hardware channel switch.
Since switching channels on the HX711 requires a dummy read and up to a 400ms
settling time handled in hx711_wait_for_ready(), toggling between Channel A
and the Timestamp channel on every trigger could introduce an ~800ms
blocking delay per sample.
Is it necessary to explicitly skip the timestamp channel during the hardware
read loop here, perhaps by checking chan->type != IIO_TIMESTAMP?
A related concern originally flagged an out-of-bounds array write to
buffer.channel[2] here, leading to a UBSAN panic. While that specific memory
safety issue is fixed later in the series by commit "iio: adc: hx711: add
support for HX710B" which safely bounds the buffer using
IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS(), the underlying logic error of triggering a bogus
hardware read for the timestamp channel appears to remain unfixed.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260518220228.63322-1-piyushpatle228@gmail.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 22:02 [PATCH v9 00/11] iio: adc: Add support for AVIA HX710B ADC Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:02 ` [PATCH v9 01/11] dt-bindings: iio: adc: hx711: clean up existing binding text Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:02 ` [PATCH v9 02/11] dt-bindings: iio: adc: hx711: add VSUP supply property Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:02 ` [PATCH v9 03/11] dt-bindings: iio: adc: hx711: add RATE GPIO property Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:02 ` [PATCH v9 04/11] dt-bindings: iio: adc: hx711: add HX710B support Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 17:21 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-18 22:02 ` [PATCH v9 05/11] iio: adc: hx711: move scale computation to per-device storage Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:02 ` [PATCH v9 06/11] iio: adc: hx711: introduce hx711_chip_info structure Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 22:02 ` [PATCH v9 07/11] iio: adc: hx711: pass trailing pulse count into hx711_read Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:02 ` [PATCH v9 08/11] iio: adc: hx711: split variable assignments in hx711_read and hx711_reset Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:02 ` [PATCH v9 09/11] iio: adc: hx711: localize loop iterators in hx711_read Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:02 ` [PATCH v9 10/11] iio: adc: hx711: pass iio_chan_spec to hx711_reset_read Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-18 22:02 ` [PATCH v9 11/11] iio: adc: hx711: add support for HX710B Piyush Patle
2026-05-18 22:39 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260518224111.C635CC2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piyushpatle228@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox