* [PATCH v9 0/2] Add Lontium LT7911EXC eDP to MIPI DSI bridge
@ 2026-05-19 10:50 syyang
2026-05-19 10:50 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] dt-bindings: bridge: " syyang
2026-05-19 10:50 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] drm/bridge: " syyang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: syyang @ 2026-05-19 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, andrzej.hajda, neil.armstrong,
dmitry.baryshkov, maarten.lankhorst, rfoss, mripard
Cc: Laurent.pinchart, tzimmermann, jonas, jernej.skrabec, devicetree,
dri-devel, linux-kernel, xmzhu, xmzhu, rlyu, xbpeng, Sunyun Yang
From: Sunyun Yang <syyang@lontium.com>
The LT7911EXC is an I2C-controlled bridge that receives eDP1.4
and output mipi dsi. This series introduces:
- A device tree binding YAML file describing the hardware
- A new DRM bridge driver implementing the basic functionality
Signed-off-by: Sunyun Yang<syyang@lontium.com>
---
Change in v9:
- dt-binding:
- drm/bridge:
1. DSI transfer callback returns success for reads without populating [sashiko-bot]
the receive buffer, leaking uninitialized memory. - fixed it by
implementing a strict whitelist mechanism.
2. DSI transfer callback polls for eDP video readiness before the
upstream encoder is enabled, guaranteeing a timeout. - removed
3. The driver attempts I2C transfers while the hardware is held in
physical reset. - fixed
4. Missing DRM_MIPI_DSI Kconfig dependency causes linker errors. - fixed
5. request_firmware is called while holding the hardware lock and
halting the MCU, risking a system pipeline stall. - fixed
6. Sleeping functions are called from atomic context in the DRM bridge callbacks. - fixed
7. lt7911exc_dsi_host_transfer bypasses the required MCU hardware halt sequence. - fixed by
internal firmware controls the panel initialization sequence and handles all MIPI
DSI command transmission.
- Link to v8: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260515080934.9870-1-syyang@lontium.com/
Change in v8:
- dt-binding:
- drm/bridge:
1. Protect firmware upgrade and DRM bridge callback paths with ocm_lock. [sashiko-bot]
2. Remove the hardware reset from the remove callback, and ensure that
all hardware reset operations are protected by ocm_lock.
3. crc reconstruction explicitly casts each byte to u32 before shifting
4. The display configuration is handled by the firmware, and the MIPI
DSI host registration issue has been fixed.
5. The batch register read/write operations have already been updated
to include return value checking.
6. The dev_err_probe() used outside of probe context has been fixed.
- Link to v7: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260512064013.40066-1-syyang@lontium.com/
Change in v7:
- dt-binding:
1. fix commit message typos(Receiver、signal) [sashiko-bot]
2. remove the ambiguity caused by "signal/dual".
- drm/bridge:
1. using devm_regulator_get_enable avoids power leaks. [sashiko-bot]
2. set reset gpio is low after cutting off power in lt7911exc_remove function, avoid backpowering.
3. synchronous request_firmware() call cause a permanent probe failure if the driver is built-in,
probe executes before the root filesystem is mounted, which would cause this to fail with -ENOENT,
we have removed this functionality. Use trigger to upgrade.
4. add `depends on I2C` and `select REGMAP_I2C` in Kconfig.
5. add return value of `devm_drm_bridge_add()` in `probe()`.
6. add directly header files (linux/slab.h, linux/delay.h, linux/regulator/consumer.h)
- Link to v6: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260508134702.4713-1-syyang@lontium.com/
Change in v6:
- dt-binding:
- drm/bridge:
1. use #define FW_FILE "Lontium/lt7911exc_fw.bin" to match linux-firmware
- Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260506013153.2240-1-syyang@lontium.com/
Change in v5:
- dt-binding:
- drm/bridge:
1. Change "mipi" to "mipi dsi" in the commit message. [Dmitry]
2. Change "eDP/MIPI" to "eDP/MIPI DSI" in Kconfig.
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260430094612.3408174-1-syyang@lontium.com/
Change in v4:
- dt-binding:
1. Fix the missing spaces on the "subject". [Krzysztof]
2. Fix the error descriptions for port@0 and port@1.
- drm/bridge:
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260429040541.3404116-1-syyang@lontium.com/
Change in v3:
- dt-binding:
- drm/bridge:
1. already submit lt7911exc_fw.bin to linux-firmware. [Dmitry]
2. remove lt7911exc_remove function.
3. drop the "lontium, " in lt7911exc_i2c_table.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260428063224.3316655-1-syyang@lontium.com/
Change in v2:
- dt-binding:
1. reset pins use active low. [Dmitry]
- drm/bridge:
1. use atomic_* callbacks. [Quentin]
2. fix the incorrect formatting and spaces.
3. add the required header files. [Dmitry]
4. remove "enabled" flag.
5. remove *fw from the lt7911exc struct.
6. .max_register and .range_max use actual range.
7. regulator use bulk interface.
8. use dev_err_probe, devm_mutex_init and devm_drm_bridge_add.
9. Replace GPL v2 with GPL.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260420023354.1192642-1-syyang@lontium.com/
---
Sunyun Yang (2):
dt-bindings: bridge: Add Lontium LT7911EXC eDP to MIPI DSI bridge
drm/bridge: Add Lontium LT7911EXC eDP to MIPI DSI bridge
.../display/bridge/lontium,lt7911exc.yaml | 89 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 16 +
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt7911exc.c | 657 ++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 763 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt7911exc.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt7911exc.c
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v9 1/2] dt-bindings: bridge: Add Lontium LT7911EXC eDP to MIPI DSI bridge
2026-05-19 10:50 [PATCH v9 0/2] Add Lontium LT7911EXC eDP to MIPI DSI bridge syyang
@ 2026-05-19 10:50 ` syyang
2026-05-19 10:50 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] drm/bridge: " syyang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: syyang @ 2026-05-19 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, andrzej.hajda, neil.armstrong,
dmitry.baryshkov, maarten.lankhorst, rfoss, mripard
Cc: Laurent.pinchart, tzimmermann, jonas, jernej.skrabec, devicetree,
dri-devel, linux-kernel, xmzhu, xmzhu, rlyu, xbpeng, Sunyun Yang,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
From: Sunyun Yang <syyang@lontium.com>
This commit adds the device tree binding schema for the Lontium LT7911EXC.
This device is an I2C-controlled bridge that converts eDP 1.4 input to MIPI
DSI output.
Signed-off-by: Sunyun Yang <syyang@lontium.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
.../display/bridge/lontium,lt7911exc.yaml | 89 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt7911exc.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt7911exc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt7911exc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3290b10ce883
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lontium,lt7911exc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/bridge/lontium,lt7911exc.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Lontium LT7911EXC eDP to MIPI DSI Bridge
+
+maintainers:
+ - Sunyun Yang <syyang@lontium.com>
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ enum:
+ - lontium,lt7911exc
+
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ reset-gpios:
+ maxItems: 1
+ description: GPIO connected to RST_ pin.
+
+ vdd-supply:
+ description: Regulator for 1.2V MIPI phy power.
+
+ vcc-supply:
+ description: Regulator for 3.3V IO power.
+
+ ports:
+ $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
+
+ properties:
+ port@0:
+ $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
+ description: Video port for eDP input.
+
+ port@1:
+ $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
+ description: Video port for MIPI DSI output.
+
+ required:
+ - port@0
+ - port@1
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - reset-gpios
+ - vdd-supply
+ - vcc-supply
+ - ports
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+ i2c {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ mipi-bridge@41 {
+ compatible = "lontium,lt7911exc";
+ reg = <0x41>;
+ reset-gpios = <&gpy8 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ vdd-supply = <<7911exc_1v2>;
+ vcc-supply = <<7911exc_3v3>;
+
+ ports {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ bridge_in: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&edp_out>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ port@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+ bridge_out: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+ };
+ };
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v9 2/2] drm/bridge: Add Lontium LT7911EXC eDP to MIPI DSI bridge
2026-05-19 10:50 [PATCH v9 0/2] Add Lontium LT7911EXC eDP to MIPI DSI bridge syyang
2026-05-19 10:50 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] dt-bindings: bridge: " syyang
@ 2026-05-19 10:50 ` syyang
2026-05-19 11:35 ` sashiko-bot
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: syyang @ 2026-05-19 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, andrzej.hajda, neil.armstrong,
dmitry.baryshkov, maarten.lankhorst, rfoss, mripard
Cc: Laurent.pinchart, tzimmermann, jonas, jernej.skrabec, devicetree,
dri-devel, linux-kernel, xmzhu, xmzhu, rlyu, xbpeng, Sunyun Yang
From: Sunyun Yang <syyang@lontium.com>
Add support for the Lontium LT7911EXC bridge chip, which converts
eDP input to MIPI DSI output using an internal firmware-controlled
pipeline.
The driver provides:
- DRM bridge integration for eDP-to-DSI routing
- MIPI DSI host interface for downstream panel attachment
- Firmware upgrade mechanism over I2C (erase/program/verify)
- GPIO-based reset and regulator management
Display timing and DSI packet generation are handled by the chip
firmware and are not configured by the driver.
Signed-off-by: Sunyun Yang <syyang@lontium.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 16 +
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt7911exc.c | 657 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 674 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt7911exc.c
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
index c3209b0f4678..013e431e8871 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
@@ -132,6 +132,22 @@ config DRM_ITE_IT6505
help
ITE IT6505 DisplayPort bridge chip driver.
+config DRM_LONTIUM_LT7911EXC
+ tristate "Lontium eDP/MIPI DSI bridge"
+ depends on OF
+ depends on I2C
+ select CRC32
+ select DRM_PANEL
+ select DRM_MIPI_DSI
+ select DRM_KMS_HELPER
+ select FW_LOADER
+ select REGMAP_I2C
+ help
+ DRM driver for the Lontium LT7911EXC bridge
+ chip.The LT7911EXC converts eDP input to MIPI
+ DSI output.
+ Please say Y if you have such hardware.
+
config DRM_LONTIUM_LT8912B
tristate "Lontium LT8912B DSI/HDMI bridge"
depends on OF
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
index beab5b695a6e..70ddca75dd3a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X) += tda998x.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_INNO_HDMI) += inno-hdmi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_ITE_IT6263) += ite-it6263.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_ITE_IT6505) += ite-it6505.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_LONTIUM_LT7911EXC) += lontium-lt7911exc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_LONTIUM_LT8912B) += lontium-lt8912b.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_LONTIUM_LT9211) += lontium-lt9211.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_LONTIUM_LT9611) += lontium-lt9611.o
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt7911exc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt7911exc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e94188e7987a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt7911exc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,657 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2026 Lontium Semiconductor, Inc.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/crc32.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/firmware.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/of_graph.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
+#include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
+#include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
+#include <drm/drm_of.h>
+#include <video/mipi_display.h>
+
+#define FW_SIZE (64 * 1024)
+#define LT_PAGE_SIZE 32
+#define FW_FILE "Lontium/lt7911exc_fw.bin"
+#define LT7911EXC_PAGE_CONTROL 0xff
+
+struct lt7911exc_dsi_output {
+ struct mipi_dsi_device *dev;
+ struct drm_panel *panel;
+ struct drm_bridge *bridge;
+ };
+
+struct lt7911exc {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct i2c_client *client;
+ struct drm_bridge bridge;
+ struct work_struct work;
+ struct mipi_dsi_host dsi_host;
+ struct lt7911exc_dsi_output output;
+
+ struct regmap *regmap;
+ /* Prevents concurrent register accesses by multiple read/write operations in the driver */
+ struct mutex ocm_lock;
+ struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
+ int fw_version;
+ bool upgrade;
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_range_cfg lt7911exc_ranges[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "register_range",
+ .range_min = 0,
+ .range_max = 0xe8ff,
+ .selector_reg = LT7911EXC_PAGE_CONTROL,
+ .selector_mask = 0xff,
+ .selector_shift = 0,
+ .window_start = 0,
+ .window_len = 0x100,
+ },
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_config lt7911exc_regmap_config = {
+ .reg_bits = 8,
+ .val_bits = 8,
+ .max_register = 0xe8ff,
+ .ranges = lt7911exc_ranges,
+ .num_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(lt7911exc_ranges),
+};
+
+static u32 cal_crc32_custom(const u8 *data, u64 length)
+{
+ u32 crc = 0xffffffff;
+ u8 buf[4];
+ u64 i;
+
+ if (!length || (length & 3))
+ return 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < length; i += 4) {
+ buf[0] = data[i + 3];
+ buf[1] = data[i + 2];
+ buf[2] = data[i + 1];
+ buf[3] = data[i + 0];
+ crc = crc32_be(crc, buf, 4);
+ }
+
+ return crc;
+}
+
+static inline struct lt7911exc *bridge_to_lt7911exc(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
+{
+ return container_of(bridge, struct lt7911exc, bridge);
+}
+
+static inline struct lt7911exc *dsi_host_to_lt7911exc(struct mipi_dsi_host *host)
+{
+ return container_of(host, struct lt7911exc, dsi_host);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Purpose of this function is rest gpio: high -> low -> high
+ * This clears the previous configuration in the chip,
+ * and finally remains high to allow the firmware to run again.
+ */
+static void lt7911exc_reset(struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc)
+{
+ gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lt7911exc->reset_gpio, 0);
+ msleep(20);
+
+ gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lt7911exc->reset_gpio, 1);
+ msleep(20);
+
+ gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lt7911exc->reset_gpio, 0);
+ msleep(400);
+
+ dev_dbg(lt7911exc->dev, "lt7911exc reset.\n");
+}
+
+static int lt7911exc_hw_mcu_halt(struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc)
+{
+ return regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe0ee, 0x01);
+}
+
+static int lt7911exc_hw_mcu_run(struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc)
+{
+ return regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe0ee, 0x00);
+}
+
+static int lt7911exc_regulator_enable(struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = devm_regulator_get_enable(lt7911exc->dev, "vcc");
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return dev_err_probe(lt7911exc->dev, ret, "failed to enable vcc regulator\n");
+
+ usleep_range(5000, 10000);
+
+ ret = devm_regulator_get_enable(lt7911exc->dev, "vdd");
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return dev_err_probe(lt7911exc->dev, ret, "failed to enable vdd regulator\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int lt7911exc_read_version(struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc)
+{
+ u8 buf[3];
+ int ret;
+
+ /* no need to halt MCU for this register access */
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe081, buf, ARRAY_SIZE(buf));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return (buf[0] << 16) | (buf[1] << 8) | buf[2];
+}
+
+static int lt7911exc_block_erase(struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc)
+{
+ struct device *dev = lt7911exc->dev;
+ const u32 addr = 0x00;
+ int ret;
+
+ const struct reg_sequence seq_write[] = {
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe0ee, 0x01),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe054, 0x01),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe055, 0x06),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe051, 0x01),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe051, 0x00),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe054, 0x05),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe055, 0xd8),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe05a, (addr >> 16) & 0xff),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe05b, (addr >> 8) & 0xff),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe05c, addr & 0xff),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe051, 0x01),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe050, 0x00),
+ };
+
+ ret = regmap_multi_reg_write(lt7911exc->regmap, seq_write, ARRAY_SIZE(seq_write));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ msleep(200);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "erase flash done.\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int lt7911exc_prog_init(struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc, u64 addr)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ const struct reg_sequence seq_write[] = {
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe0ee, 0x01),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe05f, 0x01),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe05a, (addr >> 16) & 0xff),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe05b, (addr >> 8) & 0xff),
+ REG_SEQ0(0xe05c, addr & 0xff),
+ };
+
+ ret = regmap_multi_reg_write(lt7911exc->regmap, seq_write, ARRAY_SIZE(seq_write));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int lt7911exc_write_data(struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc, const struct firmware *fw, u64 addr)
+{
+ struct device *dev = lt7911exc->dev;
+ int ret;
+ int page = 0, num = 0, page_len = 0;
+ u64 size, offset;
+ const u8 *data;
+
+ data = fw->data;
+ size = fw->size;
+ page = (size + LT_PAGE_SIZE - 1) / LT_PAGE_SIZE;
+ if (page * LT_PAGE_SIZE > FW_SIZE) {
+ dev_err(dev, "firmware size out of range\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%u pages, total size %llu byte\n", page, size);
+
+ for (num = 0; num < page; num++) {
+ offset = num * LT_PAGE_SIZE;
+ page_len = (offset + LT_PAGE_SIZE <= size) ? LT_PAGE_SIZE : (size - offset);
+ ret = lt7911exc_prog_init(lt7911exc, addr);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05d, &data[offset], page_len);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "write error at page %d\n", num);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (page_len < LT_PAGE_SIZE) {
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05f, 0x05);
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05f, 0x01);
+ //hardware requires delay
+ usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+ }
+
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05f, 0x00);
+ addr += LT_PAGE_SIZE;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int lt7911exc_write_crc(struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc, u32 crc32, u64 addr)
+{
+ u8 crc[4];
+ int ret;
+
+ crc[0] = crc32 & 0xff;
+ crc[1] = (crc32 >> 8) & 0xff;
+ crc[2] = (crc32 >> 16) & 0xff;
+ crc[3] = (crc32 >> 24) & 0xff;
+
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05f, 0x01);
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05a, (addr >> 16) & 0xff);
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05b, (addr >> 8) & 0xff);
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05c, addr & 0xff);
+
+ ret = regmap_raw_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05d, crc, 4);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05f, 0x05);
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05f, 0x01);
+ usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe05f, 0x00);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int lt7911exc_upgrade_result(struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc, u32 crc32)
+{
+ struct device *dev = lt7911exc->dev;
+ u32 read_hw_crc = 0;
+ u8 crc_tmp[4];
+ int ret;
+
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe0ee, 0x01);
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe07b, 0x60);
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe07b, 0x40);
+ msleep(150);
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(lt7911exc->regmap, 0x22, crc_tmp, ARRAY_SIZE(crc_tmp));
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(lt7911exc->dev, "Failed to read CRC: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe0ee, 0x00);
+
+ read_hw_crc = ((u32)crc_tmp[0] << 24) | ((u32)crc_tmp[1] << 16) |
+ ((u32)crc_tmp[2] << 8) | ((u32)crc_tmp[3]);
+
+ if (read_hw_crc != crc32) {
+ dev_err(dev, "lt7911exc firmware upgrade failed, expected CRC=0x%08x, read CRC=0x%08x\n",
+ crc32, read_hw_crc);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "lt7911exc firmware upgrade success, CRC=0x%08x\n", read_hw_crc);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void lt7911exc_firmware_upgrade_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = container_of(work, struct lt7911exc, work);
+ struct device *dev = lt7911exc->dev;
+ const struct firmware *fw;
+ u8 *buffer;
+ size_t total_size = FW_SIZE - 4;
+ u32 crc32;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = request_firmware(&fw, FW_FILE, dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to load '%s'\n", FW_FILE);
+ goto out_status_only;
+ }
+
+ if (fw->size > total_size) {
+ dev_err(dev, "firmware too large (%zu > %zu)\n", fw->size, total_size);
+ goto out_release_fw;
+ }
+
+ buffer = kmalloc(total_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!buffer) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out_release_fw;
+ }
+
+ memset(buffer, 0xff, total_size);
+ memcpy(buffer, fw->data, fw->size);
+ crc32 = cal_crc32_custom(buffer, total_size);
+ kfree(buffer);
+
+ mutex_lock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
+
+ lt7911exc_reset(lt7911exc);
+
+ lt7911exc_hw_mcu_halt(lt7911exc);
+ ret = lt7911exc_block_erase(lt7911exc);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to block erase.\n");
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ ret = lt7911exc_write_data(lt7911exc, fw, 0);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to write firmware data\n");
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ ret = lt7911exc_write_crc(lt7911exc, crc32, FW_SIZE - 4);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to write firmware crc\n");
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ lt7911exc_reset(lt7911exc);
+ ret = lt7911exc_upgrade_result(lt7911exc, crc32);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(dev, "firmware verification failed\n");
+
+out_unlock:
+ lt7911exc_hw_mcu_run(lt7911exc);
+ lt7911exc->fw_version = lt7911exc_read_version(lt7911exc);
+ lt7911exc->upgrade = false;
+ mutex_unlock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
+
+out_release_fw:
+ release_firmware(fw);
+ return;
+
+out_status_only:
+ mutex_lock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
+ lt7911exc->upgrade = false;
+ mutex_unlock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
+}
+
+static void lt7911exc_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+{
+ struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = bridge_to_lt7911exc(bridge);
+
+ if (lt7911exc->upgrade)
+ return;
+
+ //enable mipi stream
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe0b0, 0x01);
+}
+
+static void lt7911exc_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+{
+ struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = bridge_to_lt7911exc(bridge);
+
+ if (lt7911exc->upgrade)
+ return;
+
+ //disable mipi stream
+ regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe0b0, 0x00);
+}
+
+static int lt7911exc_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
+ struct drm_encoder *encoder,
+ enum drm_bridge_attach_flags flags)
+{
+ struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = bridge_to_lt7911exc(bridge);
+
+ if (!lt7911exc->output.bridge) {
+ dev_warn(lt7911exc->dev, "Next bridge/panel not attached yet, deferring\n");
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ }
+
+ return drm_bridge_attach(encoder, lt7911exc->output.bridge, bridge, flags);
+}
+
+static const struct drm_bridge_funcs lt7911exc_bridge_funcs = {
+ .attach = lt7911exc_bridge_attach,
+ .atomic_pre_enable = lt7911exc_atomic_pre_enable,
+ .atomic_post_disable = lt7911exc_atomic_post_disable,
+ .atomic_reset = drm_atomic_helper_bridge_reset,
+ .atomic_duplicate_state = drm_atomic_helper_bridge_duplicate_state,
+ .atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_bridge_destroy_state,
+};
+
+static int lt7911exc_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, struct mipi_dsi_device *dev)
+{
+ struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = dsi_host_to_lt7911exc(host);
+ struct drm_bridge *bridge;
+ struct drm_panel *panel;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(host->dev->of_node, 1, 0, &panel, &bridge);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (panel) {
+ bridge = drm_panel_bridge_add_typed(panel, DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI);
+ if (IS_ERR(bridge))
+ return PTR_ERR(bridge);
+ }
+ lt7911exc->output.dev = dev;
+ lt7911exc->output.bridge = bridge;
+ lt7911exc->output.panel = panel;
+
+ drm_bridge_add(<7911exc->bridge);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int lt7911exc_dsi_host_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, struct mipi_dsi_device *dev)
+{
+ struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = dsi_host_to_lt7911exc(host);
+
+ drm_bridge_remove(<7911exc->bridge);
+ if (lt7911exc->output.panel)
+ drm_panel_bridge_remove(lt7911exc->output.bridge);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The internal firmware controls the panel initialization
+ * sequence and handles all MIPI DSI command transmission.
+ */
+static ssize_t lt7911exc_dsi_host_transfer(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
+ const struct mipi_dsi_msg *msg)
+{
+ struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = dsi_host_to_lt7911exc(host);
+
+ if (msg->rx_len) {
+ dev_warn(lt7911exc->dev, "MIPI DSI read is not supported\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ switch (msg->type) {
+ case MIPI_DSI_DCS_SHORT_WRITE:
+ case MIPI_DSI_DCS_SHORT_WRITE_PARAM:
+ case MIPI_DSI_DCS_LONG_WRITE:
+ case MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_SHORT_WRITE_0_PARAM:
+ case MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_SHORT_WRITE_1_PARAM:
+ case MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_SHORT_WRITE_2_PARAM:
+ case MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_LONG_WRITE:
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ if (lt7911exc->upgrade)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ return msg->tx_len;
+}
+
+static const struct mipi_dsi_host_ops lt7911exc_dsi_host_ops = {
+ .attach = lt7911exc_dsi_host_attach,
+ .detach = lt7911exc_dsi_host_detach,
+ .transfer = lt7911exc_dsi_host_transfer,
+};
+
+static ssize_t lt7911exc_firmware_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t len)
+{
+ struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ mutex_lock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
+ if (lt7911exc->upgrade) {
+ mutex_unlock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ lt7911exc->upgrade = true;
+ mutex_unlock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
+
+ schedule_work(<7911exc->work);
+
+ return len;
+}
+
+static ssize_t lt7911exc_firmware_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%04x\n", lt7911exc->fw_version);
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(lt7911exc_firmware);
+
+static struct attribute *lt7911exc_attrs[] = {
+ &dev_attr_lt7911exc_firmware.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group lt7911exc_attr_group = {
+ .attrs = lt7911exc_attrs,
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group *lt7911exc_attr_groups[] = {
+ <7911exc_attr_group,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static int lt7911exc_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc;
+ struct device *dev = &client->dev;
+ struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!np)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "device doesn't support I2C\n");
+
+ lt7911exc = devm_drm_bridge_alloc(dev, struct lt7911exc, bridge, <7911exc_bridge_funcs);
+ if (IS_ERR(lt7911exc))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(lt7911exc), "drm bridge alloc failed.\n");
+
+ dev_set_drvdata(dev, lt7911exc);
+
+ lt7911exc->client = client;
+ lt7911exc->dev = dev;
+ lt7911exc->upgrade = false;
+
+ ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, <7911exc->ocm_lock);
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to init mutex\n");
+
+ lt7911exc->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, <7911exc_regmap_config);
+ if (IS_ERR(lt7911exc->regmap))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(lt7911exc->regmap), "regmap i2c init failed\n");
+
+ /*
+ * reset GPIO is defined as active low in device tree.
+ * gpiod_set_value_cansleep() uses logical value:
+ * 1 -> asserted (active) -> physical low -> reset enabled -> chip stop
+ * 0 -> deasserted (inactive) -> physical high -> reset released -> chip run
+ */
+ lt7911exc->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+ if (IS_ERR(lt7911exc->reset_gpio))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(lt7911exc->reset_gpio),
+ "failed to acquire reset gpio\n");
+
+ ret = lt7911exc_regulator_enable(lt7911exc);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ lt7911exc_reset(lt7911exc);
+
+ mutex_lock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
+
+ lt7911exc->fw_version = lt7911exc_read_version(lt7911exc);
+
+ mutex_unlock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
+
+ if (lt7911exc->fw_version < 0)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, lt7911exc->fw_version, "failed read version of chip\n");
+
+ lt7911exc->dsi_host.dev = dev;
+ lt7911exc->dsi_host.ops = <7911exc_dsi_host_ops;
+ lt7911exc->bridge.of_node = np;
+
+ INIT_WORK(<7911exc->work, lt7911exc_firmware_upgrade_work);
+
+ i2c_set_clientdata(client, lt7911exc);
+
+ return mipi_dsi_host_register(<7911exc->dsi_host);
+}
+
+static void lt7911exc_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+ mipi_dsi_host_unregister(<7911exc->dsi_host);
+ cancel_work_sync(<7911exc->work);
+ gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lt7911exc->reset_gpio, 1);
+}
+
+static const struct i2c_device_id lt7911exc_i2c_table[] = {
+ {"lt7911exc"},
+ {/* sentinel */}
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, lt7911exc_i2c_table);
+
+static const struct of_device_id lt7911exc_devices[] = {
+ {.compatible = "lontium,lt7911exc"},
+ {/* sentinel */}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lt7911exc_devices);
+
+static struct i2c_driver lt7911exc_driver = {
+ .id_table = lt7911exc_i2c_table,
+ .probe = lt7911exc_probe,
+ .remove = lt7911exc_remove,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "lt7911exc",
+ .of_match_table = lt7911exc_devices,
+ .dev_groups = lt7911exc_attr_groups,
+ },
+};
+module_i2c_driver(lt7911exc_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("SunYun Yang <syyang@lontium.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Lontium LT7911EXC EDP to MIPI DSI bridge driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_FIRMWARE(FW_FILE);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] drm/bridge: Add Lontium LT7911EXC eDP to MIPI DSI bridge
2026-05-19 10:50 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] drm/bridge: " syyang
@ 2026-05-19 11:35 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-05-19 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syyang; +Cc: robh, conor+dt, devicetree
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] State machine lockup and resource leak on firmware upgrade error paths.
- [High] Missing exclusivity check in `lt7911exc_dsi_host_attach` causes memory leaks and list corruption.
- [High] Data race and hardware state corruption due to lockless access in DRM atomic hooks.
- [High] Use-After-Free (UAF) due to sysfs attribute lifetime extending past driver removal.
- [Medium] Concurrency flaw in `lt7911exc_firmware_store` blocks sysfs writers and causes redundant upgrades.
--
commit aa1e91d28c6a1d1b9faea6c1c05acd8d8780f392
Author: Sunyun Yang <syyang@lontium.com>
drm/bridge: Add Lontium LT7911EXC eDP to MIPI DSI bridge
Add support for the Lontium LT7911EXC bridge chip, which converts eDP input
to MIPI DSI output using an internal firmware-controlled pipeline.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt7911exc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt7911exc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..e94188e7987ab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt7911exc.c
[ ... ]
> +static void lt7911exc_firmware_upgrade_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = container_of(work, struct lt7911exc, work);
> + struct device *dev = lt7911exc->dev;
> + const struct firmware *fw;
> + u8 *buffer;
> + size_t total_size = FW_SIZE - 4;
> + u32 crc32;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = request_firmware(&fw, FW_FILE, dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to load '%s'\n", FW_FILE);
> + goto out_status_only;
> + }
> +
> + if (fw->size > total_size) {
> + dev_err(dev, "firmware too large (%zu > %zu)\n", fw->size, total_size);
> + goto out_release_fw;
> + }
> +
> + buffer = kmalloc(total_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buffer) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_release_fw;
> + }
Will jumping to out_release_fw leave the upgrade flag permanently set?
If the firmware size is too large or kmalloc() fails, the code jumps to
out_release_fw, which calls release_firmware() and returns without clearing
lt7911exc->upgrade.
Since the flag remains set to true, all subsequent attempts to write to the
sysfs firmware attribute will fail with -EBUSY, and
lt7911exc_atomic_pre_enable() will silently return early without enabling the
MIPI stream.
[ ... ]
> +out_release_fw:
> + release_firmware(fw);
> + return;
> +
> +out_status_only:
> + mutex_lock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
> + lt7911exc->upgrade = false;
> + mutex_unlock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void lt7911exc_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> + struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = bridge_to_lt7911exc(bridge);
> +
> + if (lt7911exc->upgrade)
> + return;
> +
> + //enable mipi stream
> + regmap_write(lt7911exc->regmap, 0xe0b0, 0x01);
> +}
Can this unsynchronized check result in hardware state corruption?
This function checks lt7911exc->upgrade and proceeds to perform I2C
writes without holding ocm_lock. If a display modeset happens
concurrently with a firmware upgrade, the unsynchronized I2C write can
interleave with the firmware flashing sequence (for example, while the MCU
is halted or flash is being erased).
The same applies to lt7911exc_atomic_post_disable(). Both hooks likely need
to hold ocm_lock while checking the flag and performing the register access.
[ ... ]
> +static int lt7911exc_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, struct mipi_dsi_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = dsi_host_to_lt7911exc(host);
> + struct drm_bridge *bridge;
> + struct drm_panel *panel;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(host->dev->of_node, 1, 0, &panel, &bridge);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (panel) {
> + bridge = drm_panel_bridge_add_typed(panel, DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI);
> + if (IS_ERR(bridge))
> + return PTR_ERR(bridge);
> + }
> + lt7911exc->output.dev = dev;
> + lt7911exc->output.bridge = bridge;
> + lt7911exc->output.panel = panel;
> +
> + drm_bridge_add(<7911exc->bridge);
> + return 0;
> +}
Is an exclusivity check needed here to prevent memory leaks and list
corruption?
The function unconditionally allocates a new panel bridge via
drm_panel_bridge_add_typed() and calls drm_bridge_add(). If multiple
downstream DSI devices are attached, the previous panel bridge allocation
would be leaked.
Repeatedly calling drm_bridge_add() on the same bridge also re-initializes
its hpd_mutex, which destroys any existing lock state and imbalances the
bridge reference counts.
[ ... ]
> +static ssize_t lt7911exc_firmware_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + mutex_lock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
> + if (lt7911exc->upgrade) {
> + mutex_unlock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + lt7911exc->upgrade = true;
> + mutex_unlock(<7911exc->ocm_lock);
> +
> + schedule_work(<7911exc->work);
> +
> + return len;
> +}
Could this concurrency approach block sysfs writers and cause redundant
upgrades?
The upgrade worker lt7911exc_firmware_upgrade_work() holds ocm_lock for
the entire duration of the firmware flash process. If userspace writes to
this attribute while an upgrade is running, the store function blocks on
mutex_lock() instead of immediately returning -EBUSY.
Once the running upgrade completes, the worker clears the upgrade flag and
releases the lock. The blocked sysfs writer will then acquire the lock, see
the flag is false, set it back to true, and queue a second, redundant
firmware upgrade.
[ ... ]
> +static void lt7911exc_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct lt7911exc *lt7911exc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> + mipi_dsi_host_unregister(<7911exc->dsi_host);
> + cancel_work_sync(<7911exc->work);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(lt7911exc->reset_gpio, 1);
> +}
Does this leave a use-after-free window between driver removal and sysfs
group cleanup?
The lt7911exc_firmware sysfs attribute is registered via the driver's
dev_groups. The driver core removes these groups after this remove callback
returns.
Userspace can still write to the sysfs attribute after cancel_work_sync()
is executed here. If this occurs, lt7911exc_firmware_store() will
successfully call schedule_work() again. When the device's devres resources
are later freed, the workqueue will access the freed memory.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260519105019.22622-1-syyang@lontium.com?part=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-19 11:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-19 10:50 [PATCH v9 0/2] Add Lontium LT7911EXC eDP to MIPI DSI bridge syyang
2026-05-19 10:50 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] dt-bindings: bridge: " syyang
2026-05-19 10:50 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] drm/bridge: " syyang
2026-05-19 11:35 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox