From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Antoniu Miclaus" <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: ad4080: add support for AD4884
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 12:20:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522122017.CE3391F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522115337.18188-3-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incorrect IIO scale calculation results in a factor of 1000 error for exposed voltage scales.
--
commit ec9f31937338c4b8462c0623182623b90d6e39ad
Author: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
iio: adc: ad4080: add support for AD4884
Add support for the AD4884, a dual-channel, 16-bit, 40 MSPS SAR ADC.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4080.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4080.c
> index 265d85ac171a9..764d49eca9e0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4080.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4080.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -541,6 +542,11 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec ad4880_channels[] = {
> AD4880_CHANNEL_DEFINE(20, 32, 1),
> };
>
> +static const struct iio_chan_spec ad4884_channels[] = {
> + AD4880_CHANNEL_DEFINE(16, 16, 0),
> + AD4880_CHANNEL_DEFINE(16, 16, 1),
> +};
> +
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed that when the channel
exposes the scale attribute, the calculation in ad4080_get_scale() seems
mathematically incorrect:
drivers/iio/adc/ad4080.c:ad4080_get_scale() {
unsigned int tmp;
tmp = (st->info->scale_table[0][0] * 1000000ULL) >>
st->info->channels[0].scan_type.realbits;
*val = tmp / 1000000;
*val2 = tmp % 1000000;
return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
}
Since the fraction is calculated by multiplying by 1,000,000 and then using
modulo 1,000,000, val2 holds micro units.
However, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO tells the IIO core to format val2 as nano
units (billionths).
Does this mismatch cause the sysfs scale attribute to expose a value that is
exactly 1000 times smaller than intended for these channels?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260522115337.18188-1-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 11:53 [PATCH 0/2] iio: adc: ad4080: add support for AD4884 Antoniu Miclaus
2026-05-22 11:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad4080: add AD4884 support Antoniu Miclaus
2026-05-22 12:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-22 16:10 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-22 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: ad4080: add support for AD4884 Antoniu Miclaus
2026-05-22 12:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-22 12:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260522122017.CE3391F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=antoniu.miclaus@analog.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox