Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Antoniu Miclaus" <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: ad4080: add support for AD4884
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 12:20:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522122017.CE3391F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522115337.18188-3-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incorrect IIO scale calculation results in a factor of 1000 error for exposed voltage scales.
--

commit ec9f31937338c4b8462c0623182623b90d6e39ad
Author: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>

iio: adc: ad4080: add support for AD4884
    
Add support for the AD4884, a dual-channel, 16-bit, 40 MSPS SAR ADC.

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4080.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4080.c
> index 265d85ac171a9..764d49eca9e0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4080.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4080.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -541,6 +542,11 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec ad4880_channels[] = {
>  	AD4880_CHANNEL_DEFINE(20, 32, 1),
>  };
>  
> +static const struct iio_chan_spec ad4884_channels[] = {
> +	AD4880_CHANNEL_DEFINE(16, 16, 0),
> +	AD4880_CHANNEL_DEFINE(16, 16, 1),
> +};
> +

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed that when the channel
exposes the scale attribute, the calculation in ad4080_get_scale() seems
mathematically incorrect:

drivers/iio/adc/ad4080.c:ad4080_get_scale() {
	unsigned int tmp;

	tmp = (st->info->scale_table[0][0] * 1000000ULL) >>
		    st->info->channels[0].scan_type.realbits;
	*val = tmp / 1000000;
	*val2 = tmp % 1000000;

	return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
}

Since the fraction is calculated by multiplying by 1,000,000 and then using
modulo 1,000,000, val2 holds micro units.

However, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO tells the IIO core to format val2 as nano
units (billionths).

Does this mismatch cause the sysfs scale attribute to expose a value that is
exactly 1000 times smaller than intended for these channels?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260522115337.18188-1-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-22 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-22 11:53 [PATCH 0/2] iio: adc: ad4080: add support for AD4884 Antoniu Miclaus
2026-05-22 11:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad4080: add AD4884 support Antoniu Miclaus
2026-05-22 12:32   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-22 16:10     ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-22 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: ad4080: add support for AD4884 Antoniu Miclaus
2026-05-22 12:20   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-22 12:33   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260522122017.CE3391F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=antoniu.miclaus@analog.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox