From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Frank.Li@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: add fsl,mc1323
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 20:48:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522204845.16C181F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522203810.832631-1-Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The complex 802.15.4/ZigBee transceiver (Freescale MC1323) is being incorrectly added to trivial-devices.yaml.
--
commit b0a89da340a37ac000b2095bf76877af3c762c6f
Author: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
dt-bindings: trivial-devices: add fsl,mc1323
This commit adds the Freescale MC1323 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee
transceiver to the trivial-devices binding. This change is intended to
resolve dtbs_check warnings on the legacy i.MX53 SMD platform where the
device was used.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml
> index 23fd4513933a4..28b059c858dd1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml
> @@ -127,6 +127,8 @@ properties:
> - domintech,dmard09
> # DMARD10: 3-axis Accelerometer
> - domintech,dmard10
> + # Freescale 2.4 GHz IEEE® 802.15.4/ZigBee
> + - fsl,mc1323
[Severity: Low]
Is it appropriate to add the Freescale MC1323 to trivial-devices.yaml?
The trivial-devices schema is strictly intended for simple I2C/SPI components
that genuinely require no hardware properties other than a compatible string,
reg, and optionally a single interrupt.
Since the MC1323 is a complex IEEE 802.15.4 MAC/PHY SoC, does using
trivial-devices.yaml as a workaround for sparse legacy device tree nodes
create a regression in binding purity?
Would it be better to create a dedicated minimal schema in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ieee802154/ instead, even if it
initially only lists the minimal properties needed to validate the legacy
i.MX53 SMD device tree?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260522203810.832631-1-Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 20:38 [PATCH v3 1/1] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: add fsl,mc1323 Frank.Li
2026-05-22 20:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-27 9:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-01 2:19 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260522204845.16C181F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox