From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jisheng Zhang" <jszhang@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: i3c: dw: Add apb reset
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 14:36:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260525143616.1AFEC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260525140018.19598-3-jszhang@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Adding a second item to `resets` and `reset-names` without specifying `minItems: 1` makes the new reset mandatory, breaking validation for device trees that only provide the core reset.
--
commit 620ece5c39191636270140b0c99ea8ddfa402c6f
Author: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
dt-bindings: i3c: dw: Add apb reset
Add dt-binding for support of apb reset which is to reset the APB
interface.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/snps,dw-i3c-master.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/snps,dw-i3c-master.yaml
> index 613dce7757bc3..2575442b28ff4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/snps,dw-i3c-master.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i3c/snps,dw-i3c-master.yaml
> @@ -38,10 +38,12 @@ properties:
> resets:
> items:
> - description: Reset signal
> + - description: APB interface reset signal
>
> reset-names:
> items:
> - const: core_rst
> + - const: apb_rst
[Severity: Medium]
Does adding a second item to resets and reset-names without minItems: 1
make the new reset mandatory?
In dt-schema, when items is defined as a list, the minItems and maxItems
properties implicitly default to the number of items in the list. By adding
apb_rst as a second item without specifying minItems: 1, the binding now
strictly requires exactly two items whenever the resets property is present.
This breaks backward compatibility for existing device trees that supply only
core_rst, causing them to fail make dtbs_check. To fix this schema issue,
minItems: 1 must be explicitly added to both resets and reset-names.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260525140018.19598-1-jszhang@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-25 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-25 14:00 [PATCH v4 0/3] i3c: dw: Add apb reset support Jisheng Zhang
2026-05-25 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: i3c: dw: Describe core reset Jisheng Zhang
2026-05-25 15:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-25 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: i3c: dw: Add apb reset Jisheng Zhang
2026-05-25 14:36 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-25 15:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-25 14:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] i3c: dw: Add apb reset support Jisheng Zhang
2026-05-25 14:49 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260525143616.1AFEC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox