Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Shawn Guo" <shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document SA8797P Ride board
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 04:44:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526044417.47F7E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526034557.1669007-5-shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The new compatible block for the SA8797P Ride board is inserted in the incorrect section within the schema file, violating the established grouping order.
--

commit 83cce79db9a6915b8b40184fb1c89f108d45ab9f
Author: Shawn Guo <shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>

dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document SA8797P Ride board

This commit documents the Qualcomm SA8797P Ride board, which is an automotive
development board built on the SA8797P SoC (Nord series). It introduces a
compatible block with fallback strings for the board, SoC, and Nord base.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> @@ -303,6 +303,12 @@ properties:
>                - xiaomi,sagit
>            - const: qcom,msm8998
>  
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - qcom,sa8797p-ride
> +          - const: qcom,sa8797p
> +          - const: qcom,nord
> +

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but should this new compatible block be placed in the
Automotive/SA section instead?

The compatible list in this file is generally grouped alphabetically by SoC
family (such as APQ/MSM, IPQ, MDM, SA, SM, X). This insertion places the
SA8797P board immediately after the Mobile/MSM group (qcom,msm8998) and right
before the Networking/IPQ group (8dev,jalapeno). 

Could this be moved further down to sit alongside the other automotive SA
series SoCs, like qcom,sa8155p and qcom,sa8775p, to maintain the existing
file structure?

>        - items:
>            - enum:
>                - 8dev,jalapeno

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260526034557.1669007-1-shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-26  4:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-26  3:45 [PATCH v3 0/5] Add initial device trees for Nord SA8797P Shawn Guo
2026-05-26  3:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: crypto: qcom,inline-crypto-engine: Document Nord ICE Shawn Guo
2026-05-26  3:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord SoC series Shawn Guo
2026-05-26  4:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26  3:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord SA8797P SoC Shawn Guo
2026-05-26  3:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document SA8797P Ride board Shawn Guo
2026-05-26  4:44   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-26  3:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for " Shawn Guo
2026-05-26  4:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26  5:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Add initial device trees for Nord SA8797P Shawn Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260526044417.47F7E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox